Advertisement

Using Balloons to Co-create Welfare in the Danish Health Care Sector

  • Christa Breum AmhøjEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

This chapter explores dancing with balloons as an art-based process for intervening in the production of welfare in the Danish health care sector. Informed by nonrepresentational studies, the chapter considers how we can cultivate surplus value by shifting our thinking about welfare as a predefined service to experience welfare as felt but not yet articulated movements in-between us. The chapter shows how a cross-professional group in the Danish health care sector used balloons and their gentle, loose, vague, rhythmically intense, floating and more or less unpredictable movements to grasp welfare as felt thoughts-in-movement (Massumi 2002). This kind of ‘loose’ knowledge (McCormack 2012) involves reflecting on welfare from within the presence of the moment and all its changing worlds of real, felt movement. The chapter illustrates how the research process by intensifying welfare as felt (surplus value) can generate a passage to an ecology of ongoing form-shifting and felt experiences of welfare.

References

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2010). Making the Business School More ‘Critical’: Reflexive Critique Based on Phronesis as a Foundation for Impact. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2014). The Experience of Learning in Space and Time. Prometheus, 32(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Sheaffer, Z. (2014). Learning in Crisis: Rethinking the Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Crisis Management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyes, T., & Michels, C. (2011). The Production of Educational Space: Heterotopia and the Business University. Management Learning, 42(5), 521–536. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing Organization: Non-representational Theory and Performing Organizational Space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/Becoming/Organizing. Organization, 12(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2016). Assembly. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Himada, N., & Manning, E. (2009). INFLeXions No. 3—Micropolitics: Exploring Ethico-aesthetics.Google Scholar
  9. Hjorth, D. (2007). Lessons from Iago: Narrating the Event of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 712–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hjorth, D. (2010). Organizational Entrepreneurship: An Art of the Weak? In D. Hjorth (Ed.), Handbook on Organizational Entrepreneurship (pp. 169–192). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Hjorth, D. (2013). Public Entrepreneurship: Desiring Social Change, Creating Sociality. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(1–2), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge. Google Scholar
  13. Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Kraftl, P. (2014). Liveability and Urban Architectures: Mol(ecul)ar Biopower and the ‘Becoming Lively’ of Sustainable Communities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, M., & Lin, K. (2011). A New Paradigm of Organizational Transformation: Enacting Wholeness Praxis in the Oneness of Problem and Possibility. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(2), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manning, E. (2010). Always More Than One: The Collectivity of a Life. Body & Society, 16(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2013). For a Pragmatics of the Useless. Special Issue OS 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014a). Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014b). Just Like That. Speech at Aalborg University, Denmark. Google Scholar
  20. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual—Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCormack, D. P. (2008). Thinking-Spaces for Research-Creation. Inflexions, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  22. McCormack, D. (2012). Geography and Abstraction: Towards an Affirmative Critique. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphie, A. (2002). Clone Your Technics. Changes, 10. http://www.inflexions.org/n1_murphiehtml.html.
  24. Murphie, A. (2008). Clone Your Techniques: Research Creation, Radical Empiricism and the Constraints of Models. Inflexions, 1(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  25. Nayak, A. (2008). On The Way To Theory: A Processual Approach. Organization Studies, 29(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, S. (2002). Overcoming Aesthetic Muteness: Researching Organizational Members’ Aesthetic Experience. Human Relations, 55(7), 821–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thain, A. (2008). Affective Commotion: Minding the Gap in Research-Creation. Inflexion, 1(1), 1–12. Google Scholar
  29. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. Routledge. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations