Skip to main content

Using Kinaesthetic Exertion to Engender Team Psychological Safety in UK Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sensuous Learning for Practical Judgment in Professional Practice

Abstract

This chapter is based on educating UK Undergraduate Business School students with the opportunities afforded by an Open Space Learning (OSL) environment. Our use of the Arts-based Intervention (ABI) of physical performance challenges normative Business School pedagogy that has been claimed to reduce students to becoming “voracious copy machines” (Beghetto and Kauffman 2009, p. 300).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, N. J. (2006). The Arts and Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 486–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to Kill Creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(September–October), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2008). On the Practise of Practice In-tensions and Ex-tensions in the Ongoing Reconfiguration of Practice. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook of New Approaches to Organization Studies (pp. 112–131). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2014). The Experience of Learning in Space and Time. Prometheus, 32(1), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Sheaffer, Z. (2014). Learning in Crisis: Rethinking the Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Crisis Management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation Is Not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. F., & Baker, S. J. (2012). To “Catch the Sparkling Glow”: A Canvas for Creativity in the Management Classroom. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 704–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1951). Phases In-group Problem Solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 4(4), 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). The Art of Leadership and its Fine Art Shadow. Leadership, 6(3), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Intellectual Estuaries: Connecting Learning and Creativity in Programs of Advanced Academics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 296–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2011). Reaping the Benefits of Task Conflict in Teams: The Critical Role of Team Psychological Safety Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1982). Play, Thought and Language. Peabody Journal of Education, 60(3), 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. G. (1984). In the Field. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, D. W. E., & Miles, R. E. (1995). Trust in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies, and the Opportunity Cost of Controls. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers in Theory and Research (pp. 16–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1999). Implications of a System’s Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (Ed.). (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How Does Trust Affect the Performance of On-going Work Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring, and Effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Lens. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & Mogelof, J. P. (2006). Explaining Psychological Safety in Innovation Teams. In L. Thompson & H. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams (pp. 109–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J. T. (2011). Psychological Safety Influences Relationship Behavior. Corrections Today, 73, 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Shor, I. (1987). A Pedagogy of Liberation: Dialogues on Transforming Education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is Yours a Learning Organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(March), 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). The Design of Work Teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behaviour (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the Virtual Organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(May–June), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M., & Wisdom, J. (Eds.). (2006). Developing Creativity in Higher Education: The Imaginative Curriculum. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagements and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C. (2007). Exploring New Learning and Teaching Spaces. Warwick Interactions Journal, 30, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High Involvement Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. (2004). The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety, and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moingeon, B., & Edmondson, A. C. (1998). Trust and Organizational Learning. In N. Lazaric & E. Lorenz (Eds.), Trust, Learning, and Economic Expectations. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, N., Chillington Rutter, C., Neelands, J., & Heron, J. (2011). Open Space Learning: A Study in Trans-disciplinary Pedagogy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S., & Picard, R. (2003). Exertion Interfaces: Sports Over a Distance for Social Bonding and Fun. In Proceedings of CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 5–10, Ft. Lauderdale, FL (www.oxfordictionaries.com).

  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, E. (1998). Trust Breaks Down in Electronic Context but Can Be Repaired by Some Initial Face-to-Face Contact. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 18–23, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Cramer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning Spaces: Creating Opportunities for Knowledge Creation in Academic Life. Maidenhead and New York: McGraw Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, M., Cohen, N. A., & Klein, K. J. (2012). The Co-evolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The Creative Age: Knowledge and Skills for the New Economy. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Noble, D. S., Mishra, A. K., & Cooke, W. N. (1999). Predicting Process Improvement Team Performance in an Automotive Firm: Explicating the Roles of Trust and Empowerment. In E. Mannix & M. Neale (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams (Vol. 2, pp. 71–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Tempest, S. (2009). The Winter of Our Discontent: The Design Challenge for Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 576–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S. (2008). Theatrical Performance as Unfreezing: Ties That Bind at the Academy of Management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Ladkin, D. (2009). Understanding Arts-Based Methods in Managerial Development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1991). An Enduring Competitive Advantage. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). The Role of Play in Development. In Mind in Society (M. Cole, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2008). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive & Computational Perspectives). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (1990). The Social Psychology of Innovation in Groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (pp. 309–333). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., & Pino Pasternak, D. (2010). Metacognition, Self-Regulation and Meta-Knowing. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 673–711). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M. H., & McKenney, J. L. (1995). Social Context and Interactions in On-going Computer-Supported Management Groups. Organization Science, 6(4), 394–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley J. B. Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roberts, A.J.B., Iordanou, I. (2019). Using Kinaesthetic Exertion to Engender Team Psychological Safety in UK Higher Education. In: Antonacopoulou, E., Taylor, S. (eds) Sensuous Learning for Practical Judgment in Professional Practice. Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99049-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics