Skip to main content
Book cover

Raspberry pp 145–158Cite as

Use of Imaging Technologies for High Throughput Phenotyping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter we describe a high throughput phenotyping system that we have developed for raspberry and other soft fruit crops and its application to against individual (water stress regimes, vine weevil and Phytophthora root rot) and combined stresses. The term phenotype is used to describe the morphology, physiology, biochemistry and ontogeny of a plant, encompassing the diverse array of traits that contribute to the plant’s functional form. Plant phenotype is expressed as a consequence of the interaction between the plant genetic background (i.e. genotype) and the biotic and abiotic conditions experienced by the plant in its growing environment. A key focus of raspberry and other crop breeding is to understand the genetic control of desirable plant traits and the influence of environmental conditions on trait expression, which relies on the ability to collect quantitative information on target traits across genetically-characterised populations of plants. The process of characterising plant traits in detail, referred to as plant phenotyping, is a major challenge when relating plant genetic information to traits for plants in realistic growing environments. Advances in genetics and genomics methods in raspberry including high throughput DNA sequencing which has provided a new GbS linkage map and genome scaffolds, developments in microarray and RNA seq data and data analysis tools have provided large amounts of detailed information on raspberry. There is, however, a lack of corresponding methodology for high throughput plant phenotyping, which limits the quantity of available trait information, and creates a bottleneck in raspberry and other crop breeding (Fahlgren et al. 2015; Pauli et al. 2016a, b). The key factor in understanding traits at a genetic level is an ability to accurately phenotype. The main limitation is the significant effort and complexity of measurements, depending on trait, required to capture phenotyping data from plants grown in relevant environments – i.e. field conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altangerel N et al (2017) In vivo diagnostics of early abiotic plant stress response via Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:3393–3396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge AM, Hook SJ, Grove CI, Rivera G (2009) The ASTER spectral library version 2.0. Remote Sens Environ 113:711–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SC et al (2014) Pheno-copter: a low altitude, autonomous remote-sensing robotic helicopter for high-throughput field-based phenotyping. Agronomy 4:279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Neumann K, Friedel S, Kilian B, Chen M, Altmann T, Klukas C (2014) Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. Plant Cell 26:4636–4655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deery D, Jimenez-Berni J, Sirault XRR, Jones HG, Furbank RT (2014) Proximal remote sensing buggies and potential applications for phenotyping. Agronomy 4:349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deery D, James R, Rebetzke GJ (2016a) The potential value of canopy temperature for commercial wheat breeding. Report developed through grant CSP00148 for the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Deery D et al (2016b) Methodology for high-throughput field phenotyping of canopy temperature using airborne thermography. Front Plant Sci 7:1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European plant phenoyping network (2018) About_EMPHASIS. https://emphasis.plant-phenotyping.eu/. Accessed 7 May 2018

  • Fahlgren N, Gehan MA, Baxter I (2015) Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Curr Opin Plant Biol 24:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorani F, Schurr U (2013) Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:17.11–17.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics – technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 16:635–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gehan MA et al (2017) PlantCV v2: image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. PeerJ 5:e4088. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4088

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem ME, Marrou H, Sinclair TR (2015) Physiological phenotyping of plants for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci 20:139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin FL, Lorence A, Topp CN (2015) Applying high-throughput phenotyping to plant–insect interactions: picturing more resistant crops. Curr Opin Insect Sci 9:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesford MJ, Lorence A (2017) Plant phenotyping: increasing throughput and precision at multiple scales. Funct Plant Biol 44:v–vii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoi F, Omasa K (2009) Estimating vertical plant area density profile and growth parameters of a wheat canopy at different growth stages using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging. ISPRS J Photogramm Rem Sens 64:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (2004) Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology. Adv Bot Res 41:107–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (2014) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG, Vaughan RA (2010) Remote sensing of vegetation: principles, techniques, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Klukas C, Chen D, Pape JM (2014) Integrated analysis platform: an open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Plant Physiol 165:506–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolber Z, Klimov D, Ananyev G, Rascher U, Berry J, Osmond BA (2005) Measuring photosynthetic parameters at a distance: laser induced fluorescence transient (LIFT) method for remote measurements of photosynthesis in terrestrial vegetation. Photosynth Res 84:121–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leister D, Varotto C, Pesaresi P, Niwergall A, Salamini F (1999) Large-scale evaluation of plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana by non-invasive image analysis. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:671–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lobet G (2017) Image analysis in plant sciences: Publish Then Perish. Trends Plant Sci 22:559–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lobet G, Draye X, Périlleux C (2013) An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 9:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroni M, Rossini M, Guanter L, Alonso L, Rascher U, Colombo R, Moreno J (2009) Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications. Remote Sens Environ 113:2037–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli D et al (2016a) Field-based high-throughput plant phenotyping reveals the temporal patterns of quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Stress-Responsive Traits in Cotton. G3 (Bethesda) 6:865–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli D, Chapman SC, Bart R, Topp CN, Lawrence-Dill CJ, Poland J, Gore MA (2016b) The quest for understanding phenotypic variation via integrated approaches in the field environment. Plant Physiol 172:622–634

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran S et al (2015) Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: a review. Eur J Agron 70:112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter A, Liebisch F, Hund A (2015) Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis. Plant Methods 11:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D et al (2017) A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions. Plant Methods 13:74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W et al (2014) Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun 5:5087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, D., Aitkenhead, M., Karley, A.J., Graham, J., Jones, H.G. (2018). Use of Imaging Technologies for High Throughput Phenotyping. In: Graham, J., Brennan, R. (eds) Raspberry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics