Abstract
The services provided by smart cities are based on complex information infrastructures composed of a broad range of interdependent but loosely coupled technological, organizational, institutional and legal systems. The development and evolution of information infrastructures enabling smart services provision follows logics and paths that are substantially different from the ones of self-contained technologies or plug and play applications. In this chapter, we argue that the investigation of these phenomena needs to be carried out with a case study approach, which looks not only at development but also at longer-term evolution dynamics. At the same time, a better understanding of information infrastructures logics and paths is highly relevant for policy makers and project managers, in order to be able to govern such initiatives. For the purpose of showing some of the key feature of this infrastructural dimension, this chapter analyses the development of an e-Prescription system in Italy. As many other digital services provided by smart cities, digital prescription service is the result of practices distributed across a network of actors and digital solutions, which work across organizations. In addition, they are at the intersection of multiple logics which aim at the creation of different public values such as economic—through expenditures control and efficient allocation of resources-, legal—through transactions traceability and doctors’ accountability-, and service quality—providing the users with better services through a smarter management of the information and resources. Thus, this case provides the occasion to examine the multilevel infrastructural complexity upon which smart cities initiatives are built, showing the mix of local, regional and national layers enabling a smart prescription services provision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aanestad, M., & Jensen, T. B. (2011). Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20, 161–176.
Aanestad, M., Grisot, M., Hanseth, O., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2017). Information Infrastructures for eHealth. In Information Infrastructures within European Health Care (pp. 11–23). Springer, Cham.
Baron, M. (2012). Do we need smart cities for resilience? Journal of Economics and Management, 10, 32–46.
Betty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 369–386.
Ciborra, C. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford, England/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (Eds.). (2009). ICT and innovation in the public sector: European studies in the making of e-government. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (Eds.). (2014). The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice: Interoperability and Infrastructures for European Transborder Judicial Proceedings (Law, Governance and Technology Series) (Vol. (Vol. 13)). New York, NY: Springer.
Drobniak, A. (2012). The urban resilience–economic perspective. Journal of Economics and Management, 2012(10), 5–20.
Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”.
Goes, P. B. (2014). Design science research in top information systems journals. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 38, iii–viii.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37, 337–355.
Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.19
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.
Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technical systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Jansen, A., & Nielsen, P. (2005). Theorizing convergence: Co-evolution of information infrastructures. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 67–100.
Kierkegaard, P. (2013). E-prescription across Europe. Health and Technology, 3(3), 205–219.
Lichtner, V., Venters, W., Hibberd, R., Cornford, T., & Barber, N. (2013). The fungibility of time in claims of efficiency: The case of making transmission of prescriptions electronic in English general practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(12), 1152–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.001
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2003). Universal principles of design. Gloucester, MA: Rockport.
López-Quiles, J. M., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2018). Smart technologies for smart governments: A review of technological tools in smart cities. In Smart Technologies for Smart Governments (pp. 1–18). Springer, Cham.
Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589–613.
Paskaleva, K., Evans, J., Martin, C., Linjordet, T., Yang, D., & Karvonen, A. (2017). Data governance in the sustainable smart city. Informatics, 4(4), 41.
PDM. (2015). Strategia per le Crescita Digitale 2014–2020. Retrieved from http://www.agid.gov.it/
Porra, J. (1999). Colonial systems. Information Systems Research, 10(1), 38–69.
Sanner, T. A., Manda, T. D., & Nielsen, P. (2014). Grafting: Balancing control and cultivation in information infrastructure innovation. Journal of the Association of Informations Systems, 15(4), 220–243.
Schaffers, H., Li, M., & Gavras, A. (2011b). Introduction, Part VIII: Future internet applications. In J. Domingue et al. (Eds.), The future internet: Future internet assembly 2011: Achievements and technological promises (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 6656, pp. 403–405). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Sage.
Solanas, A., Patsakis, C., Conti, M., Vlachos, I. S., Ramos, V., Falcone, F., … Martinez-Balleste, A. (2014). Smart health: A context-aware health paradigm within smart cities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8), 74–81.
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.
Stefanov, D. H., Bien, Z., & Bang, W. C. (2004). The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: Structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 12(2), 228–250.
Vassilakopoulou, P., Tsagkas, V., & Marmaras, N. (2012). Workaround identification as an instrument for work analysis and design: A case study on ePrescription. Work, 41, 1805–1810. https://doi.org/10.3233/Wor-2012-0389-1805
Velicogna, M. (2017). In search of smartness: The EU e-Justice challenge. Informatics, 4(4), 38.
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case-studies in is research—Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Woodard, C. J. (2008). Architectural control points. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST 2008), Atlanta, GA.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Resca, A., Grisot, M., Velicogna, M. (2019). Building Smarter Healthcare for Smart Cities: Investigating the Infrastructural Dimension of Smart Services Provision Through an e-Prescription Case Study. In: Rodriguez Bolivar, M.P. (eds) Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98952-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98953-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)