Abstract
In Chap. 2, I describe a simple intercept-and-resend attack that an eavesdropper can perform on a QKD link. I explain how Alice encoding information in two or more randomly chosen mutually unbiased bases compels Eve to measure the quantum states in incorrect basis, resulting in increased quantum bit error rate in the raw key. In principle, Eve could circumvent detection if she was in possession of a quantum device that could copy an information-carrying photon on a different photon. Such a device would allow her to copy all the quantum states in the channel, one at a time, and then measure the quantum states after Alice and Bob discuss their basis choice. However, as discussed in Chap. 1, there is a fundamental limiting principle, known as the no-cloning theorem, that forbids Eve from cloning unknown quantum states in the quantum channel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
S. Aaronson, A. Arkhipov, in Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium Theory of Computing, STOC ’11 (ACM, New York, 2011), pp. 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993636.1993682
F. Bouchard, R. Fickler, R.W. Boyd, E. Karimi, Sci. Adv. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601915, http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/2/e1601915.full.pdf
V. Bužek, M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1844
N. Gisin, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 432 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.432
N. Herbert, Found. Phys. 12, 1171 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729622
C.K. Hong, Z.Y. Ou, L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044
N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, N. Gisin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.33
V. Scarani, S. Iblisdir, N. Gisin, A. Acín, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1225 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1225
V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N.J. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lütkenhaus, M. Peev, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301
L. Sheridan, V. Scarani, Phys. Rev. A 82, 030301 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.030301
R. Valivarthi, Q. Zhou, C. John, F. Marsili, V.B. Verma, M.D. Shaw, S.W. Nam, D. Oblak, W. Tittel, Quantum Sci. Tech. 2, 04LT01 (2017). http://stacks.iop.org/2058-9565/2/i=4/a=04LT01
R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1827 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1827
W.K. Wootters, W.H. Zurek, Nature 299, 802 (1982)
F. Xu, M. Curty, B. Qi, H.-K. Lo, New J. Phys. 15, 113007 (2013). http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/15/i=11/a=113007
X. Yuan, Z. Zhang, N. Lütkenhaus, X. Ma, Phys. Rev. A 94, 062305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.062305
Y. Zhang, F.S. Roux, T. Konrad, M. Agnew, J. Leach, A. Forbes, Sci. Adv. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501165, http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/2/e1501165.full.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Islam, N.T. (2018). Cloning of High-Dimensional Quantum States. In: High-Rate, High-Dimensional Quantum Key Distribution Systems. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98929-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98929-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98928-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98929-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)