Abstract
There are a massive amount of texts on social media. However, only a small portion of these texts is informative for a specific purpose. If we accurately filter the texts in the streams, we can obtain useful information in real time. In a keyword-based approach, filters are constructed using keywords, but selecting the appropriate keywords to include is often difficult. In this work, we propose a method for filtering texts that are related to specific topics using both crowdsourcing and machine learning based text classification method. In our approach, we construct a text classifier using FastText and then annotate whether the tweets are related to the topics using crowdsourcing. In this step, we consider two strategies, optimistic and pessimistic approach, for selecting tweets which should be assessed. Then, we reconstruct the text classifier using the annotated texts and classify them again. We assume that if we continue instigating this loop, the accuracy of the classifier will improve, and we will obtain useful information without having to specify keywords. Experimental results demonstrated that our proposed system is effective for filtering social media streams. Moreover, we confirmed that the pessimistic approach is better than the optimistic approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banko, M., Cafarella, M.J., Soderland, S., Broadhead, M., Etzioni, O.: Open information extraction from the web. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, pp. 2670–2676, San Francisco, CA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2007)
Belkin, N.J., Croft, W.B.: Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin? Commun. ACM 35(12), 29–38 (1992)
Abel, F., Hauff, C., Houben, G.J., Stronkman, R., Tao, K.: Twitcident: fighting fire with information from social web streams. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2012 Companion, pp. 305–308, New York. ACM (2012)
Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating“word of mouth”. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1995, pp. 210–217, New York. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1995)
Sriram, B., Fuhry, D., Demir, E., Ferhatosmanoglu, H., Demirbas, M.: Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. SIGIR 2010, pp. 841–842, New York. ACM (2010)
Hannon, J., Bennett, M., Smyth, B.: Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2010, pp. 199–206, New York. ACM (2010)
Uysal, I., Croft, W.B.: User oriented tweet ranking: a filtering approach to microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2011, pp. 2261–2264, New York. ACM (2011)
Rocchio, J.J.: Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: Salton, G. (ed.) The Smart Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pp. 313–323. Prentice Hall (1971)
Grady, C., Lease, M.: Crowdsourcing document relevance assessment with mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT 2010, pp. 172–179, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Alonso, O., Baeza-Yates, R.: Design and implementation of relevance assessments using crowdsourcing. In: Clough, P., et al. (eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval, pp. 153–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_16
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5, 135–146 (2017)
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Mikolov, T.: Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pp. 427–431. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Douze, M., Jégou, H., Mikolov, T.: Fasttext.zip: compressing text classification models, December 2016
Campbell, C., Cristianini, N., Smola, A.J.: Query learning with large margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2000, pp. 111–118, San Francisco, CA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2000)
Lewis, D.D., Gale, W.A.: A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In: Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds.) SIGIR 1994, pp. 3–12. Springer, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_1
Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 45–66 (2002)
Acknowledgments
The research results have been achieved by “Research and Development on Fundamental and Utilization Technologies for Social Big Data,” the Commissioned Research of National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), JAPAN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Suzuki, Y., Nakamura, S. (2018). Information Filtering Method for Twitter Streaming Data Using Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning. In: Hartmann, S., Ma, H., Hameurlain, A., Pernul, G., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11030. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98812-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98812-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98811-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98812-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)