Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconciling Logics of Organizational Behaviour in the EU Public Consultations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lobbying in the European Union

Abstract

Public consultations are an important communication channel between policymakers and interest organizations across systems and levels of governance and constitute a key venue for lobbying and interest representation. The European Union implements one of the most elaborated and complex systems of stakeholder consultations. This consultation regime constitutes an institutional constraint that structures stakeholders’ organizational and lobbying behavior. This is particularly relevant for European level associations, which aim to perform various roles within EU policymaking but whose presence and function in Brussels are challenged by a constant increase in the direct lobbying of policymakers by individual interest organizations. In relation to this, this study asks: to what extent and in what way do public consultations support the lobbying activities of European associations in EU policymaking? The study argues that public consultations support the European associations’ lobbying by offering them a venue in which they can successfully combine their ‘logic of membership’ with their ‘logic of influence’ in pursuit of their lobbying goals. The argument is supported with examples and evidence from five public consultations conducted by the European Commission in the environmental policy and two consultations on reforming the EU Better Regulation policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Communication from the Commission of 25 July 2001 ‘European governance—A White Paper’ [COM (2001) 428 final—Official Journal C 387 of 12.10.2001].

  2. 2.

    Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.Official Journal L 123/1 of 12.5.2016.

  3. 3.

    American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union.

  4. 4.

    Conseil Européen de l’Industrie Chimique (European Chemical Industrie Council).

  5. 5.

    This definition excludes the category of non-institutionalized associative structures that Cowles refers to as ad hoc organizations (usually comprised of companies) whose purpose and existence may change based on the policy issue at hand (e.g. the ENERG-8) (Cowles 2002, 64).

References

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Wright, J. R. (1992). Competitive lobbying for a legislator’s vote. Social Choice and Welfare, 9, 229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Wright, J. R. (1994). Counteractive lobbying. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J. (1999). Business routes of influence in Brussels: Exploring the choice of direct representation. Political Studies, 47(2), 240–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berhagen, P., & Mitchel, N. (2009). The determinants of direct corporate lobbying. European Union Politics, 10(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. (2008). Policy issues, organizational format and the political strategies of interest organizations. West European Politics, 31, 1188–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2007). Competing for consultation: Civil Society and conflict between the European Commission and the European Parliament. West European Politics, 30(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, P. (2009). The European Commission. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors and issues (pp. 19–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2003). Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission. European Union Politics, 4(2), 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A. (2013). Issues, preferences and ties: Determinants of EU interest groups’ preference attainment in the Environmental Policy Area. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 552–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A. (2014). Explaining interest groups’ articulation of policy preferences in the European Commission’s Open Consultations: An analysis of the Environmental Policy Area. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1221–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A. (2015). Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultation. European Union Politics, 16(2), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A. (2017). Designing stakeholder consultations: Reinforcing or alleviating bias in the European Union system of governance? European Journal of Political Research, 56(1), 46–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, A., & Ibenskas, R. (2015). Quantitative text analysis and the study of EU lobbying and interest groups. European Union Politics, 16(3), 429–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D. (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M. G. (2002). Large firms and the transformation of EU business associations: A historical perspective. In J. Greenwood (Ed.), The effectiveness of EU business associations (pp. 64–78). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crombez, C. (2002). Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union. European Union Politics, 3(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (2002). The importance of institutions to associations: Evidence from the cross-national organisation of business interests project. In J. Greenwood (Ed.), The effectiveness of EU business associations (pp. 53–63). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2002). EU interest groups and their members: When is membership a ‘collective action problem’? In V. Wright, R. Balme, & D. Chabanet (Eds.), Collective action and European integration (pp. 227–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., & Webster, R. (2000). The governability of EU business associations. Journal of European Integration, 23(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., & Westgeest, A. (2002). Conclusions. In J. Greenwood (Ed.), The effectiveness of EU business associations (pp. 223–234). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, A., & Jordan, G. (1993). The rationality of lobbying in Europe: Why are Eurogroups so numerous and so weak? Some evidence from the car industry. In S. Mazey & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Community (pp. 122–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowitz, I. (2004). Lobbying as a two way strategy: Interest intermediation or mutual instrumentalisation. In A. Warntjen & A. Wonka (Eds.), Governance in Europe: The role of interest groups (pp. 75–92). Baden Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potters, J., & Van Winden, F. (1990). Modelling political pressure as transmission of information. European Journal of Political Economy, 6(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potters, J., & Van Winden, F. (1992). Lobbying and asymmetric information. Public Choice, 74(3), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quittkat, C. (2011). The European Commission’s online consultations: A success story? Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(3), 653–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1981/1999). The organisation of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Accessed October 6, 2014, from http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp99-1.pdf

  • Skodvin, T., Gullberg, A. T., & Aakre, S. (2010). Target-group influence and political feasibility: The case of climate policy design in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 854–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (2009). Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 756–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, SO, Southampton, UK

    Adriana Bunea

Authors
  1. Adriana Bunea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Bunea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Doris Dialer

  2. European Parliament, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Margarethe Richter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bunea, A. (2019). Reconciling Logics of Organizational Behaviour in the EU Public Consultations. In: Dialer, D., Richter, M. (eds) Lobbying in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98800-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation