Skip to main content

Data Sharing and Reuse of Health Data for Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1912 Accesses

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Facilitating the reuse and sharing of electronic health data for research is an important foundation for reengineering and streamlining research processes and will be critical to accelerating learning health cycles and broadening the knowledge that can be used to improve healthcare and patient health outcomes. In this chapter, data sharing refers to sharing data between partners and systems (not necessarily sharing of research results) in ways that preserve the meaning and integrity of the data. A range of ethical, legal, and technical considerations have thus far hindered the development and application of approaches for such reuse and data sharing, in general. However, standards adoption and technical capabilities are progressing, and incentives are now beginning to align to facilitate data sharing. Principles and values of data sharing and the responsible use of data and data standards have been published, and there is recognition of the value of “real-world data” (RWD) to generate additional evidence upon which to base clinical decisions. These will require broad adoption, adherence, communication, and collective support to positively transform research processes and informatics.

Participants in clinical research studies typically expect and want their data to be shared widely and appropriately such that we can all learn. Based on learning from research results, it is expected that patient care will be improved. This is the basis for learning health systems (LHS), in which research is clearly a vital component. The knowledge gained from sharing the results of research can inform healthcare and clinical decisions to complete the learning cycle.

This chapter will describe the benefits and implementation considerations of reusing health data, particularly that from electronic health records (EHR), for clinical research, bio-surveillance, pharmacovigilance, outcome assessments, public health, quality reporting, and other research-related studies. Use cases are provided to illustrate the positive impact that data reuse and sharing will have for patients, clinicians, research sponsors, regulatory agencies, insurers, and all involved in LHS. Consensus-based principles for data sharing, technical aspects, and business requirements are also provided, along with specific examples of data sharing collaborations, initiatives, and tools. In the future, we hope that research will become embedded within health systems and that organizations will continue to embrace, harmonize, and broadly adopt standards and technologies to meet this challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Data Economy. 9039, London : s.n., 6–12 May 2017, The Economist, Vol. 423.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kush RD. Science Translational Medicine. 2009. pp. 24–28, Vol. 1, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://www.cdisc.org/system/files/members/standard/foundational/glossary/CDISC%20Glossary%20v11.pdf.

  4. Wikipedia. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traceability.

  5. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society HIMSS. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society HIMSS. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/what-is-interoperability.

  6. Hammond WE, Jaffe C, Kush RD. Healthcare standards development-the value of nurturing collaboration. J Am Health Inf Manag Assoc (AHIMA). 2009;80:44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. https://bridgmodel.nci.nih.gov/.

  8. Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. Washington DC: United States Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/De-identification/hhs_deid_guidance.pdf.

  9. Merriam Webster Dictionary. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anonymization.

  10. Conn J. ‘Swivel chair’ interoperability: FDA seeks solutions to mesh EHRs and drug research record systems. s.l. Modern Healthcare; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kanter JH. Your life, your health: share your health data electronically: It may save your life, Library of Congress Control Number 2012904124. Joseph H Kanter; 2012. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Precision Medicine Initiative. Online: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/precisionmedicine/initiative.

  13. [Online]. https://www.cdisc.org/esdi-document.

  14. [Online]. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2010/08/WC500095754.pd.

  15. Electronic Source Data Interchange (eSDI) Group. Leveraging the CDISC standards to facilitate the use of electronic source data within clinical trials. s.l. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ITI Technical Committee. IHE IT infrastructure technical framework supplement retrieve form for data capture. s.l. IHE International;s 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. HITSP Inabling Healthcare Interoperability. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. http://hitsp.org/InteroperabilitySet_Details.aspx?MasterIS=false&InteroperabilityId=456&PrefixAlpha=1&APrefix=IS&PrefixNumeric=08&ShowISId=456.

  18. Kush R, Alschuler L, Ruggeri R, Cassells S, Gupta N, Bain L, Claise K, Shah M, Nahm M. Implementing single source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:662–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takenouchi K, Yuasa K, Shioya M, Kimura M, Watanabe H, Oki Y, Aki. Development of a new seamless data stream from EMR to EDC system using SS-MIX2 standards applied for observational research in diabetes mellitus. Learn Health J. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferranti JM, Musser RC, Kawamoto K, Hammond WE. The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: a critical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(3):245–52. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Delaney BC, Curcin V, Andreasson A, Arvanitis TN, Bastiaens H, Corrigan D, Ethier J-F, Kostopoulou O, Kuchinke W, McGilchrist M, van Royen P, Wagner P. Translations medicine and patient safety in Europe: TRANSFoRm- Architecture for learning health system in Europe. BioMed Res Int. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. HL7. Fast Healthcare Interoperabilty Resources. Online: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/.

  23. Nordo A, et al. A comparative effectiveness study of eSource used for data capture for a clinical research registry. Int J Med Inform. 2017;103:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Food and Drug Administration. [Cited: July 6, 2018]. https://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/ucm507090.htm.

  25. Kush RD, Goldman M. Fostering responsible data shring through standards. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2163–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Connecting health and care for the nation a shared nationwide interoperability roadmap. Washington, DC: Office Of National Coordinator Health Information Technology; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Federal health IT strategic plan 2015–2020. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fridsma D, Payne T. AMIA letter in support of ONC pledge to improve interoperability. American Medical Informatics Association. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://www.amia.org/sites/default/files/AMIA-Letter-of-Support-Stakeholder-Commitments-Pledge.pdf.

  29. Harmon A. Where’d you go with my DNA? New York: New York Times; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Skloot R. The immortal life of henrietta lacks. Crown publishers, ISBN 978-1-4000-5217-2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Committee on Strategies for Responsible, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Sharing of clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. http://www.nap.edu

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zozus M, et al. Assessing data quality for healthcare systems data used in clinical research. Washington, DC: NIH Collaboratory Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, LaVange L, Marinac-Dabic D, Marks PW, Robb MA, Shuren J, Temple R, Woodcock J, Yue LQ Califf RM. Real-world evidence — what Is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pelletier L, Beaudin C. Q Solutions: Essential Resources for Healthcare Quality Professionals. National Association for Healthcare Quality. Second Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohmann C, et al. Sharing and resue of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e018647. s.l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rozwell C, Kush R, Helton E. Saving time and money. Appl Clin Trials. 2007;16(6):70–4.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Douga M ODM. s.l. Clinical data interchange standards consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hume S, et al. Current applications and future directions for the CDISC operational. J Biomed Inform. 2016;60:352–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. eTRIKS. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://www.etriks.org/.

  40. https://www.etriks.org/standards-starter-pack/.

  41. Brajovic S, et al. Quality assessment of spontaneous triggered adverse event reports received by the Food and Drug Administration. s.l. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21. http://www.asterstudy.com/.

  42. Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N, et al. Integrating clinical research with the healthcare enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:S94–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Takenouchi K. Healthcare link project in Japan: development of a new seamless data stream from EHR to EDC system using SS-MIX2 storages. Chicago: DIA; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-00297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Learning Health Community. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. http://www.learninghealth.org/history/.

  46. Academic Research Organization (ARO). s.l. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2017. https://www.tri-kobe.org/koho/PressRelease/2016/1st_ARO_WS_flyer.pdf.

  47. BRIDG. Clinical data standards interchange consortium. [Online]. https://www.cdisc.org/standards/domain-information-module/bridg.

  48. Becnel LB, Hastak S, Ver Hoef W, Milius RP, Slack M, Wold D, Glickman ML, Brodsky B, Jaffe C, Kush R, Helton E. BRIDG: a domain information model for translational and clinical protocol-driven research. J Am Med Inform. 2017;24:882–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Coalition Aganinst Major Diseases (CAMD). Critical Path Institute. [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://c-path.org/programs/camd/.

  50. CDISC. Clinical data interchange standards consortium. [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://www.cdisc.org/.

  51. Critical Path institute. Critical Path Institute. [Online]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://c-path.org/about/.

  52. Coalition For Accelerating Standards and Therapies. Critical Path Institute. [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://c-path.org/programs/cfast/.

  53. Common Protocol Template. TransCelerate Biopharma Inc. [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. http://www.transceleratebiopharmainc.com/assets/common-protocol-template/.

  54. CORBEL – Coordinated Research Infrastructures Building Enduring Life-science Services. elixir. [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://www.elixir-europe.org/about/eu-projects/corbel.

  55. Bertagnolli M, et al. Advantages of a truly open-access data-sharing model. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1178–81. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1702054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Project Data Sphere. [Online] [Cited: February 12, 2018]. https://www.projectdatasphere.org/projectdatasphere/html/PressRelease/LAUNCH.

  57. European Clinical Research infrastructure Network. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. http://www.ecrin.org/.

  58. De Moor G, Sundgren M, Kalra D, Schmidt A, Dugas M, Claerhout B, Karakoyun T, Ohmann C, Lastic P, Ammour N, Kush R, Dupont D, Cuggia M, Daniel C, Thienpont G, Coorevits P. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project. J Biomed Inform. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. ELIXIR [Online] [Cited: February 19, 2018]. https://www.elixir-europe.org/.

  60. EHR incentives and Certifications. Health IT.gov. [Online] [Cited: February 18, 2018]. https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/meaningful-use-definition-objectives.

  61. Murphy SN, Weber G, Mendis M, Gainer V, Chueh HC, Churchill S, Kohane I. Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2). J Am Med Inform. 2010;17:124–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Infectious Diseases Data Observatory. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. https://www.iddo.org/tools-and-resources.

  63. i-HD. The European Institute for Innovation through Health Data i~HD. [Online] [Cited: February 08, 2018]. http://www.i-hd.eu/index.cfm/about/description-and-scope/.

  64. Innovative Medicines Initiative. IMI. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. http://www.imi.europa.eu/projects-results/catalogue-project-tools.

  65. [Online] [Cited: February 09, 2018]. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25342177.

  66. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics. [Online] [Cited: February 11, 2018]. https://ohdsi.org/.

  67. One Mind. [Online] [Cited: February 09, 2018]. https://onemind.org/.

  68. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. https://www.pcori.org/.

  69. FDA’s Sentinel Initiative. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/FDAsSentinelInitiative/ucm2007250.htm.

  70. Delaney BC, Curcin V, Andreasson A, et al. Translational medicine and patient safety in Europe: TRANSFoRm—architecture for the learning health system in Europe. Biomed Res Int. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/961526. s.l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. TRANSFoRm. i-HD [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. http://www.transformproject.eu/.

  72. Vivli Center for Global Research Data. [Online] [Cited: February 10, 2018]. http://vivli.org/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Daniels Kush PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Examples of Collaborations, Initiatives, and Tools Related to Data Sharing in Clinical Research

In this section, we describe some important (national and global) collaborations, initiatives, and tools related to reusing clinical data for purposes of streamlining research. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.

ARO Council and Global Network

The Academic Research Organization Council and Global Network brings together Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, Europe, and the USA with strategic initiatives toward harmonization and standardization of data to streamline clinical research and accelerate academic innovation to overcome intractable diseases [46].

ASTER

The Adverse Drug Event Spontaneous Triggered Event Reporting (ASTER) study was a proof of concept for the model of using data from electronic health records to generate automated safety reports, replacing the current system of manual ADE reporting. The CDISC-IHE Retrieve Form for Data Capture (RFD) formed the basis for the data sharing from EHRs to directly populate MedWatch forms. The time to report an AE was reduced from 34 min to less than 1 min [41].

BRIDG Model

The Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) Model is an information model that represents the domain of protocol-driven research. It provides a shared view of the concepts of basic, preclinical, clinical, and translational research, including genomics. This information model is an ISO, CDISC, and HL7 standard. It supports development of data interchange standards and technology solutions that can enable semantic interoperability for biomedical and clinical research and bridges research and the healthcare arena. Currently there is work being done to develop HL7 FHIR research resources, which will be harmonized with the BRIDG model [47, 48].

CAMD

Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD) is an initiative of the Critical Path Institute (C-Path). “CAMD is a public-private partnership aimed at creating new tools and methods that can be applied to increase the efficiency of the development process of new treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related neurodegenerative disorders with impaired cognition and function. CAMD has the following areas of focus: (1) qualification of objective biomarkers, including both biochemical and observational digital biosensor measures of health, (2) development of common data standards, (3) creation of integrated databases for clinical trials data, and (4) development of quantitative model-based tools for therapeutics development” [49].

CDISC

Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) is a standards development organization focused on developing global data standards for clinical research. Its mission is to develop and support global, platform-independent data standards that enable information system interoperability to improve medical research and related areas of healthcare. CDISC has successfully collaborated with multiple other stakeholder groups to initiate and develop industry-accepted standards, such as BRIDG. CDISC standards are now required for data in regulatory submissions to FDA and Japan’s PMDA [50].

C-Path

The Critical Path Institute (C-Path) is a nonprofit, public-private partnership with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). C-Path’s aim is to accelerate the pace and reduce the costs of medical product development through the creation of new data standards, measurement standards, and method standards that aid in the scientific evaluation of the efficacy and safety of new therapies.”CAMD is an example of one of C-Path’s projects, many of which are executed through consortia [51].

CFAST

The Coalition For Accelerating Standards and Therapies (CFAST) was initiated by C-Path and CDISC to develop global therapeutic area standards that augment the foundational standards for clinical research. Contributing organizations included FDA, EMA, PMDA, NCI, IMI, and TransCelerate BioPharma [52]. The resulting standards are published in CDISC Therapeutic Area User Guides and through CDISC SHARE, with specifications cited in the FDA and PMDA Data Standards Catalogs.

Common Protocol Template

The Common Protocol Template (CPT), developed by TransCelerate Biopharma Inc. in collaboration with stakeholders, is a harmonized and streamlined approach to the format and content of clinical trial protocols. It aims to ease interpretation by the study sites and global regulatory authorities while enabling downstream automation of many clinical processes and alignment to industry data standards. It has now been harmonized with an FDA/NIH protocol template and will become an ICH project [53].

CORBEL

The CORBEL (Coordinated Research Infrastructures Building Enduring Life-Science Services) consortium is an 11 major new biological and medical research infrastructures (BMS RI) in Europe, which plan to create a platform for harmonized user access to technologies, samples, and data services required for biomedical research [54].

DataSphere

Project DataSphere LLC, which is not-for-profit initiative of the CEO Roundtable on Cancer’s Life Sciences Consortium (LSC), has developed a free digital library/data laboratory to share and analyze patient-level comparator arm data from phase III cancer clinical trials. “Prostate Dream Cancer Challenge confirmed that an open-access model empowers global communities of scientists from diverse backgrounds and promotes crowd-sourced solutions to important clinical problems” [55, 56].

Duke University eSource study

A proof-of-concept study that aimed to quantify the benefits of the secondary use of EHR data for clinical research. Findings showed a 37% reduction in time, significant reduction in resource needs and zero data quality issues [23].

ECRIN

The European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) provides investigators support from trial preparation to implementation navigating the fragmented health and legal systems of individual European countries in order to conduct multinational trials. ECRIN led the CORBEL project on consensus-based principles for sharing clinical trial data, results of which were published in December 2017 in the British Medical Journal Open [57].

EHR4CR

“The EHR4CR project, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) in collaboration with 34 partners (academic and industrial) and 2 subcontractors is one of the largest public-private partnerships aiming at providing adaptable, reusable and scalable solutions (tools and services) for reusing data from Electronic Health Record systems for Clinical Research” [58].

ELIXIR

ELIXIR “unites Europe’s leading life science organizations in managing and safeguarding the increasing volume of data being generated by publicly funded research. It coordinates, integrates and sustains bioinformatics resources across its member states and enables users in academia and industry to access services that are vital for their research.” ECRIN and ELIXIR are both part of the CORBEL consortium [59].

Health Level Seven (HL7)

Health Level Seven is an international standards organization dedicated to the development and interoperability of health information through products such as V2 and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) [10].

Healthcare Link and IHE-CDISC integration profiles

Under the leadership of Rebecca Kush and Landen Bain, CDISC launched the Healthcare Link Initiative to create a means of better linking healthcare and clinical research through standards. As a part of Healthcare Link, Integrating the Health Enterprise (IHE) and CDISC created the Retrieve Form Data Capture (RFD) and Retrieve Protocol for Execution (RPE) standards that a majority of electronic health record systems were configured for as part of Meaningful Use (MU) requirements [16, 60]. BRIDG also supports the Healthcare Link philosophy.

i2b2

Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) is an NIH-funded National Center for Biomedical Computing (NCBC) aimed to develop an informatics framework based on Massachusetts General Hospital’s Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) [61].

IDDO

The Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) builds upon the success of WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) to provide a global collaborative data platform for the benefit of clinical care and research of communicable diseases [62].

I~HD

The European Institute for Innovation Through Health Data (I~HD) arose out of the IMI’s Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR), SemanticHealthNet, and other projects to become an organization of reference and does so through services such as the Interoperability Asset Register, an online service that contains documents, templates, clinical models, technical specifications, and software pertaining to the interoperability of health information [63].

IMI

Innovative Medicine Initiative is a public- private partnership between the European Union and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) that has resulted in over 100 projects generating 60+ project tools and 2000+ publications [64].

LHC

The goal of the Learning Health Community (LHC) is to improve the health of the individual and population through rapid cycle improvements to a learning health system (LHS) from the information and knowledge gained from data collected from clinical research, individuals, population health, and care delivery. The LHC will leverage existing opportunities such as meaningful use and personal health records and strive to create a harmonization among stakeholders to facilitate data sharing for the good of the individual and the population, promising to empower personalized medicine [44, 65].

OHDSI

Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI ) strives to share observational healthcare data through common data models and development of tools for data analytics and visualization [66]. OHDSI arose from initial work to develop the OMOP model, which is no longer an active project. The OMOP Common data Model is maintained by OHDSI.

OneMind

OneMind is dedicated to disseminating donor funding for brain disease and injury research including the data standardization, curation, and mining necessary for regulatory approvals. Standardization of the data from two mega-studies conducted at separate NIH institutes (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute of Mental Health) allows for the data to be merged into a “collaboratory” at the completion of the studies [67].

PCORI

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute funds comparative clinical effectiveness research in order to change clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. The PCORI program consists of five areas of focus: clinical effectiveness and decision science, healthcare delivery and disparities research, evaluation and analysis, engagement, and research infrastructure known as PCORnet [68].

SHARE

The Shared Health and Research Electronic (SHARE) library is a metadata repository and associated tools and services that enables users of CDISC to access the standards in various formats that are human- and machine-readable [27].

Sentinel

The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Sentinel Initiative is a national electronic system that enables researchers to proactively monitor the safety of FDA-regulated medical products after they reach the market complementing the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System. This system compiles data from multiple sources such as claims data, registries, and EHRs using a distributed data model that allows the ability to maintain patient privacy and monitor the safety of regulated products [69].

SMART on FHIR

Harvard Medical School and Boston Children’s Hospital initiated an interoperability project in 2010, with a goal of “developing a platform to enable medical applications to be written once and run unmodified across different healthcare IT systems.” This was named Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART). In 2013, the platform was modified to adopt the FHIR standard that was emerging at that time. The new platform was called “SMART on FHIR”.

TRANSFoRm

The Translational Research and Patient Safety in Europe (TRANSFoRm) project is the European learning health system initiative aimed to develop a digital infrastructure, method, model, and standards for three areas of focus of a LHS: use of biobank data sets develop genotype and phenotypes for epidemiological studies, embedding regulated clinical trials within the EHR with a focus on patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), and decision support tools for clinical care [70, 71].

Vivli

Designed to reduce barriers to data sharing in clinical research, Vivli, acting as an independent broker, created an independent data repository, cloud-based analytics platform and search engine, based on the gatekeeper model, where industry, academia, patient organizations, government, and not-for-profit organization’s researchers can share, access, and host data [72].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kush, R.D., Nordo, A.H. (2019). Data Sharing and Reuse of Health Data for Research. In: Richesson, R., Andrews, J. (eds) Clinical Research Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98779-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98779-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98778-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98779-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics