Skip to main content

Implementation and the 1991 Child Support Act

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The 1991 Child Support Act

Abstract

This chapter argues that the problems experienced during implementation and operation are in large part due to failings in legislature, discussing the role of ‘next-steps’ agencies, and how they moved the lines of accountability. It argues that the use of ‘next-steps’ agencies distorted our understanding and appreciation of the failure that took place when the Child Support Agency was in operation. The chapter then provides the conceptual background to this study’s approach to implementation and its relationship to policy formation and policy failure. The chapter is brief, this is because it argues that what have typically been argued to be implementation concerns, such as those raised within the idea of ‘perfect implementation’, should be seen as stemming from problems at other stages in the policy process. The chapter argues that instead of using the idea of ‘perfect implementation’, the criteria of ‘perfect legislation’ should be pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Whilst it was not possible to include all influential scholars due to the confines of this chapter, other scholars not discussed have been considered when developing our understanding and approach to implementation studies.

  2. 2.

    Similar points were echoed, and important contributions also made, by Derthick (1972), Hargrove (1975, 1983), Berman (1978), Dunsire (1978a, 1978b).

  3. 3.

    It should be noted that alongside the contribution made by Hogwood and Gunn (1984), there was significant contribution made by other scholars, such as Van Meter and Van Horn (1975), Sabatier and Mazmanian (1979, 1983), Mazmanian and Sabatier (1981), Hood (1976), Derthick (1972). Some significant scholars have been left out of our analysis in order to prevent an extensive account of the plethora of writings, yet their significance should be noted.

  4. 4.

    This is similar in approach to Weber’s construction of an ideal-type model of bureaucracy, published after his death in his seminal piece Economy and Society (1922).

  5. 5.

    Which as deLeon states, are often ‘lumped under the heading ‘top-down’ perspectives’ (1998, 316).

References

  • Bardach, E. (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. M., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1981). Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (1978). The Study of Macro and Micro Implementation of Social Policy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleon, P. (1998). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(2), 315–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derthick, M. (1972). New Towns In-Town: Why a Federal Programme Failed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, P. (2005). Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A. (1978a). Implementation in a Bureaucracy. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A. (1978b). Control in a Bureaucracy. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A. (1995). Administrative Theory in the 1980s: A Viewpoint. Public Administration, 73(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1980). Backward Mapping. Implementation Research and Policy Decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1982). Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions. In W. L. Williams (Ed.), Studying Implementation. Methodological and Administrative Issues. Chatham, NJ: Chatham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferman, B. (1990). Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box. California: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, M. L, Bomen, A. O’M., Leicester, J. P., & O’Toole, L. J. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practise: Toward a Third Generation. Glen View: Scott Foresman/Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, L. (1978). Why Is Implementation so Difficult? Management Services in Government, 33(4), 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E. C. (1975). The Missing-Link: The Study of the Implementation of Social Policy. Washington: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, E. C. (1983). The Search for Implmentation Theory. In Zeckhanser, R. J., & Leebaert, D. (Eds.), What Role for Government? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. (1999). Accountancy, New Public Management and the Problems of the Child Support Agency. Journal of Law and Society, 26(2), 150–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing Public Policy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjern, B. (1982). Implementing Research: The Link Gone Missing. Journal of Public Policy, 1(3), 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjern, B., & Hull, C. (1982). Implementing Research as Empirical Constitutionalism. In B. Hjern & C. Hull (Eds.), Implementation Beyond Hierarchy. Amsterdam: Elsevier [Special issue of European Journal of Political Research], pp. 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjern, B., & Porter, D. O. (1981). Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. W. (1987). From Crisis to Compliancy? Shaping Public Policy in Britain. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. W., & Gunn, L. A. (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1976). The Limits of Administration. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1978). Standing the Study of Policy Implementation on Its Head. In W. D. Burnham & M. Weinberg (Eds.), American Politics and Public Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G., & Wildavsky, A. (1978). Implementation as Evolution. In H. Freeman (Ed.), Policy Studies Review Annual 1978. Beverly Hills: Sage (Reprinted in Pressman and Wildavsky, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (1981). Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. (1995). Rational Choice and Policy Implementation, American Review of Public Administration, 25(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J. (2001). The Theory-Practise Issue in Policy Implementation Research. Paper presented at the ESRC Seminar Series, Seminar Three, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, N. (1995). Unravelling Conceptual Developments in Implementation Analysis: A Study of Australian Industry Policy. Public Administration, 74(4), 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. The Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives. Policy Analysis, 5, 481–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. (1983). Can Regulation Work? The Implementation of the 1972 California Coastal Initiative. New York and London: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2013). The Public Policy Theory Primer (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meter, D., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 445–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCarthy-Cotter, L. (2019). Implementation and the 1991 Child Support Act. In: The 1991 Child Support Act. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98761-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics