Skip to main content

Fundamentals and Advances in 3D Face Recognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biometric-Based Physical and Cybersecurity Systems

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on the fundamentals and advances in the research and commercial aspects of 3D face recognition systems. We consider security applications that have accelerated the growth of biometrics leading to both commercial and research-based system developments. A review of such systems and the factors influencing the choice of biometrics are considered. Advanced techniques in 3D face recognition are touched up on with emphasis on case studies based on different sensor-based databases. These sensors include the FRVT, Microsoft KINECT and stereo vision-based systems. The development of biometric systems needs to consider standards for interoperability, basis for evaluation through a benchmarking process as well as legal and privacy consideration which are covered in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. Scheuermann, S. Schwiderski-Grosche, B. Struif, Usability of Biometrics in Relation to Electronic Signatures (GMD-Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik, Sankt Augustin, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.S. Teh, A.B.J. Teoh, S. Yue, A survey of keystroke dynamics biometrics. Sci. World J. 2013, 24 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.K. Jain, P. Flynn, A.A. Ross, Handbook of Biometrics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Satone, G. Kharate, Feature selection using genetic algorithm for face recognition based on PCA, wavelet and SVM. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Inf. 6, 39–52 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.F. Abate, M. Nappi, D. Riccio, G. Sabatino, 2D and 3D face recognition: A survey. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 28, 1885–1906 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P.J. Phillips, P. Grother, R. Micheals, D.M. Blackburn, E. Tabassi, M. Bone, Face recognition vendor test 2002, Presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  7. SITA, Biometrics Centred Border Management: Helping governments reliably and securely verify travellers’ identities, SITA2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. UK Her Majesty Post office, Guidance on Biometric Passport and Passport Reader, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.M. Bronstein, M.M. Bronstein, R. Kimmel, Expression-invariant 3D face recognition, in Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication: 4th International Conference, AVBPA 2003 Guildford, UK, June 9–11, 2003 Proceedings, ed. by J. Kittler, M.S. Nixon (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003), pp. 62–70

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Mansfield-Devine, Comment on biometrics. Biometric Technol. Today, July–August, 12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.D. Kaushik, A. Budhwar, A. Dubey, R. Agrawal, S. Gupta, V.K. Pathak, et al., An Efficient 3D Face Recognition Algorithm, in 2009 Third International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security, 2009, pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Yuxiao, J. Dalong, Y. Shuicheng, Z. Lei, Z. Hongjiang, Automatic 3D reconstruction for face recognition, in Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings, 2004, pp. 843–848

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Blanz, T. Vetter, Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25, 1063–1074 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Brecht. Facing the future with 3D facial recognition technology. Biometric Technol. Today. Jan 2009, 8–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Suman, Automated face recognition, applications within law enforcement, Market Technol. Rev., Oct 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Beumier, M. Acheroy, Face verification from 3D and grey level clues. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 22, 1321–1329 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. X. Chenghua, W. Yunhong, T. Tieniu, Q. Long, Automatic 3D face recognition combining global geometric features with local shape variation information, in Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings, 2004, pp. 308–313

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Wang, C.-S. Chua, Y.-K. Ho, Facial feature detection and face recognition from 2D and 3D images. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 23, 1191–1202 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Michael, M. Michael, G. Gunther, S. Marc, S. Jochen, Automatic reconstruction of personalized avatars from 3D face scans. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 22, 195–202 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Ansari, M. Abdel-Mottaleb, M.H. Mahoor, Disparity-based modelling for 3D face recognition, in ICIP, 2006, pp. 657–660

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Blanz, K. Scherbaum, H.P. Seidel, Fitting a morphable model to 3D scans of faces, in IEEE ICCV, 2007, pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. X. Lu, A. Jain, Deformation modeling for robust 3D face matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30, 1346–1357 (Aug 2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y.A. Li, Y.J. Shen, G.D. Zhang, T. Yuan, X.J. Xiao, H.L. Xu, An efficient 3D face recognition method using geometric features, in 2010 Second International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2010, pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Pan, B. Dai, Q. Peng, Fast and robust 3D face matching approach, in Image Analysis and Signal Processing, 2010, pp. 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Wang, J. Liu, X. Tang, Robust 3D face recognition by local shape difference boosting. IEEE PAMI 32, 1858–1870 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Uchida, T. Shibahara, T. Aoki, H. Nakajima, K. Kobayashi, Face recognition using passive stereo vision, in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2005, pp. 950–953

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Sharma, M. Goyani, 3D face recognition techniques - a review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. IJERA 2, 787–798 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Huq, B. Abidi, S. G. Kong, M. Abidi, A survey on 3D modeling of human faces for face recognition, in 3D Imaging for Safety and Security, vol. 35, ed. by A. Koschan, M. Pollefeys, M.A. Abidi (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 25–67

    Google Scholar 

  29. N.U. Powar, J.D. Foytik, V. K. Asari, H. Vajaria, Facial expression analysis using 2D and 3D features, in Proceedings of the 2011 I.E. National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON), 2011, pp. 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Sheng, A.H. Sadka, A.M. Kondoz, Automatic single view-based 3-D face synthesis for unsupervised multimedia applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 18, 961–974 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M.P. Segundo, L. Silva, O.R.P. Bellon, C.C. Queirolo, Automatic face segmentation and facial landmark detection in range images. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part B Cybernet. 40, 1319–1330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. T.S.N. Uchida, T. Aoki, H. Nakajima, K. Kobayashi, Face recognition using passive stereo vision, in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2005, pp. 950–953

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Huang, K. Ouji, M. Ardabilian, Y. Wang, L. Chen, 3D face recognition based on local shape patterns and sparse representation classifier, in Advances in Multimedia Modeling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6523, ed. by K.T. Lee, W.H. Tsai, H.Y. Liao, T. Chen, J.W. Hsieh, C.C. Tseng, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 206–216

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Tang, Y. Sun, B. Yin, Y. Ge, 3D face recognition based on sparse representation. J. Supercomput. 58, 84–95 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. K. Tae-Kyun, J. Kittler, Design and fusion of pose invariant face-identification experts. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 16, 1096–1106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. V. Bevilacqua, F. Adriani, G. Mastronardi, 3D head normalization with face geometry analysis, genetic algorithms and PCA. J. Circuits Syst. Comput. 18, 1425–1439 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. H. Zhou, A. Mian, L. Wei, D. Creighton, M. Hossny, S. Nahavandi, Recent advances on singlemodal and multimodal face recognition: A survey. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 44, 701–716 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D.-L. Xu, J.-B. Yang, Y.-M. Wang, The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 1914–1943 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. F. Hajati, A.A. Raie, Y. Gao, Pose-invariant multimodal (2D+3D) face recognition using geodesic distance map. J. Am. Sci. 7(10), 583–590 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. Xiong, L. Huang, C. Liu, Real-time 3d face recognition with the integration of depth and intensity images, in Eighth International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition - Volume Part II, ser. ICIAR’11, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 222–232

    Google Scholar 

  41. K.W. Bowyer, K. Chang, P. Flynn, A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D + 2D face recognition. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 101, 1–15 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Z. Sun, A.A. Paulino, J. Feng, Z. Chai, T. Tan, A.K. Jain, A study of multibiometric traits of identical twins. Proc. SPIE Biometric Technol. Hum. Identif. VII 7667, 76670T-1–76670T-12 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. V. Nirgude, A. Gulve, S. Waghmare, Face recognition system using principal component analysis & linear discriminant analysis method simultaneously with 3d morphable model. UACEE Int. J. Artif. Intell. Neural Netw., 40–44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. G.G. Gordon, Face recognition based on depth and curvature features, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1992. Proceedings CVPR'92., 1992 I.E. Computer Society Conference on, 1992, pp. 808–810

    Google Scholar 

  45. J.C. Lee, E. Milios, Matching range images of human faces, in [1990] Proceedings Third International Conference on Computer Vision, 1990, pp. 722–726

    Google Scholar 

  46. F.B. ter Haar, R.C. Veltkamp, 3D face model fitting for recognition, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Part IV, ed. by D. Forsyth, P. Torr, A. Zisserman, 5305th edn., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. F. Hajati, A.A. Raie, Y. Gao, 2.5D face recognition using patch geodesic moments. Pattern Recogn. 45, 969–982 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Berretti, A.D. Bimbo, P. Pala, 3D face recognition using iso-geodesic stripes. IEEE Pattern Anal. Mach. Vis. 32, 2162–2177 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Bronstein, R. Kimmel, A. Spira, 3D face recognition without facial surface reconstruction, in European Conference on Computer Vision, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. Liu, A.S. Mian, A. Krishna, B.Y.L. Li, Using Kinect for face recognition under varying poses, expressions, illumination and disguise, Presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 I.E. Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2013

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. van den Yannick, Gender Classification with Visual and Depth Images (Tilburg University, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. B.Y.L. Li, A.S. Mian, W. Liu, A. Krishna, Using Kinect for face recognition under varying poses, expressions, illumination and disguise, in 2013 I.E. Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2013, pp. 186–192

    Google Scholar 

  53. Y. Sheng, A.H. Sadka, A.M. Kondoz, Automatic 3D face synthesis using single 2D video frame. Electron. Lett. 40, 1173–1175 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. A. Mian, M. Bennamoun, R. Owens, An efficient multimodal 2D-3D hybrid approach to automatic face recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 1927–1943 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. S. Ramalingam, Fuzzy interval-valued multi criteria based decision making for ranking features in multi-modal 3D face recognition. Fuzzy Set Syst. 337, 25–51 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Artec Broadway 3D, 3D face recognition walk-through device. (3 Aug 2017). Available: https://www.artecid.com/products/artec-broadway-3d

  57. Ayonix, Ayonix Public Security (Ayonix, Tokyo)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Morpho (ed.), Identification - Morpho 3D Face Reader: Fast, Convenient, Secure Facial Recognition (Morpho, France, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. Perala, Cheaper biometric smartphones flooding global market: acuity (Jan 23, 2017). Available: http://findbiometrics.com/mobile-biometrics-primer-403020/?omhide=true

  60. N.L. Clarke, S.M. Furnell, Authentication of users on mobile telephones – A survey of attitudes and practices. Comput. Secur. 24, 519–527 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. H.A. Shabeer, P. Suganthi, Mobile phones security using biometrics, in International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 2007), 2007, pp. 270–274

    Google Scholar 

  62. ISO, Standards on information technology, access control scenario and grading scheme committee, in Biometric Performance Testing and Reporting Part 5, vol. ISO/IEC 19795-5:2011, (International Standards Organisation, Geneva, 2016), p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  63. ISO, International standards for HCI and usability, in ISO 13407: Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems, (International Standards Organisation, Geneva), 1999

    Google Scholar 

  64. V.N. Nirgude, V.N. Nirgude, H. Mahapatra, S.A. Shivarkar, Face recognition system using principal component analysis & linear discriminant analysis method simultaneously with 3D morphable model and neural network BPNN method. Glob. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci. 4 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  65. S. Marcel, BEAT – biometrics evaluation and testing. Biometric Technol. Today 2013, 5–7 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. ISO, ISO/IEC 2382-37:2012 Information technology -- vocabulary -- part 37: Biometrics, ed, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  67. Common criteria for information technology security evaluation-part 1: introduction and general model, vol. Version 2.3, ed, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  68. E.M. Newton, L. Sweeney, B. Malin, Preserving privacy by de-identifying face images. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 232–243 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. K.W. Bowyer, K. Chang, P. Flynn, A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D+2D face recognition. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 101, 1–15 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. R. Dass, R. Rani, D. Kumar, Face recognition techniques: a review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 4, 70–78 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  71. W.W. Bledsoe, A Facial Recognition Project Report (Panoramic Research, Palo Alto, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  72. T. Mathew, P. Alex, Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3, 71–86 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. C. Ki-Chung, K. Seok Cheol, K. Sang Ryong, Face recognition using principal component analysis of Gabor filter responses, in Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems, 1999. Proceedings. International Workshop on, 1999, pp. 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  74. J.M. Kim, M.A. Kang, A study of face recognition using the PCA and error back-propagation, in 2010 Second International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, 2010, pp. 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  75. Y. Jian, D. Zhang, A.F. Frangi, Y. Jing-yu, Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 131–137 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. M.Z. Alom, A. Khan, R. Biswas, M. Khan, Night mode face recognition using adaptively weighted sub-pattern PCA, in 2012 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2012, pp. 119–125

    Google Scholar 

  77. W.L. Braje, D. Kersten, M.J. Tarr, N.F. Troje, Illumination effects in face recognition. Psychobiology 26, 371–380 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  78. A. Wagner, J. Wright, A. Ganesh, Z. Zhou, H. Mobahi, Y. Ma, Toward a practical face recognition system: robust alignment and illumination by sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34, 372–386 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Y.M. Lu, B.Y. Liao, J.S. Pan, A face recognition algorithm decreasing the effect of illumination, in 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, 2008, pp. 378–381

    Google Scholar 

  80. L. Wu, P. Zhou, X. Xu, An illumination invariant face recognition scheme to combining normalized structural descriptor with single scale retinex, in Biometric Recognition: 8th Chinese Conference, CCBR 2013, Jinan, China, November 16–17, 2013. Proceedings, ed. by Z. Sun, S. Shan, G. Yang, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Yin, (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2013), pp. 34–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  81. J.Y. Cartoux, J.T. Lapreste, M. Richetin, Face authentification or recognition by profile extraction from range images, in [1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Interpretation of 3D Scenes, 1989, pp. 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  82. T. Bajarin, Why your smartphone will be your next PC. TIME (25 Feb 2013). Available: http://techland.time.com/2013/02/25/why-your-smartphone-will-be-your-next-pc/

  83. B. Weyrauch, B. Heisele, J. Huang, V. Blanz, Component-Based Face Recognition with 3D Morphable Models, in 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2004, pp. 85–85

    Google Scholar 

  84. K. Konolige, Projected texture stereo, in 2010 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2010, pp. 148–155

    Google Scholar 

  85. Z. Zhang, Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE MultiMedia 19, 4–10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. R. Berri, D. Wolf, F. Osório, Telepresence robot with image-based face tracking and 3D perception with human gesture interface using kinect sensor, in 2014 Joint Conference on Robotics: SBR-LARS Robotics Symposium and Robocontrol, 2014, pp. 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  87. F. Gossen, T. Margaria, Comprehensible People Recognition Using the Kinect’s Face and Skeleton Model, in 2016 I.E. International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), 2016, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  88. Microsoft. Kinect for Windows. (4 Aug 2013, 2017). Available: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/kinect/develop

  89. S. Ramalingam, N.T. Viet, 3D face synthesis with KINECT, Presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 I.E. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  90. Non-contact 3D digitizer. (2004). Available: http://www.dirdim.com/pdfs/DDI_Konica_Minolta_Vivid_9i.pdf

  91. Z. Zhou, A. Wagner, H. Mobahi, J. Wright, Y. Ma, Face recognition with contiguous occlusion using markov random fields, in 2009 I.E. 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, 2009, pp. 1050–1057

    Google Scholar 

  92. H. Yagou, Y. Ohtake, A. Belyaev, Mesh smoothing via mean and median filtering applied to face normals, in Geometric Modeling and Processing. Theory and Applications. GMP 2002. Proceedings, 2002, pp. 124–131

    Google Scholar 

  93. J. Vollmer, R. Mencl, H. Müller, Improved Laplacian smoothing of noisy surface meshes. Comput. Graphics Forum 18, 131–138 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. B. Gökberk, A. Ali Salah, L. Akarun, R. Etheve, D. Riccio, J.-L. Dugelay, 3D face recognition, in Guide to Biometric Reference Systems and Performance Evaluation, ed. by D. Petrovska-Delacrétaz, B. Dorizzi, G. Chollet, (Springer, London, 2009), pp. 263–295

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  95. A. Mian, M. Bennamoun, R. Owens, Automatic 3D face detection, normalization and recognition, in Proceedings 2006 Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission 3DPVT 2006, IEEE, 2006, pp. 735–742

    Google Scholar 

  96. S. Ramalingam, R. Venkateswarlu, Stereo face recognition using discriminant eigenvectors, in WSES International Conference on Speech, Signal and Image Processing 2001 (SSIP 2001), Malta, 2001, pp. 2621–2626

    Google Scholar 

  97. S. Ramalingam, 3D face recognition: feature extraction based on directional signatures from range data and disparity maps, in 2013 I.E. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, pp. 4397–4402

    Google Scholar 

  98. P.J. Phillips, W.T. Scruggs, A.J.O. Toole, P.J. Flynn, K.W. Bowyer, C.L. Schott, et al., FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale experimental results. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 831–846 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. P.N. Belhumeur, J.P. Hespanha, D.J. Kriegman, Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 711–720 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. S. Ramalingam, N.T. Viet, 3D face synthesis with KINECT, in 2013 I.E. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013, pp. 4433–4438

    Google Scholar 

  101. A. Mian, N.E. Pears, 3D face recognition, in 3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications, (Springer, London, 2012), pp. 311–366

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  102. G. Cannon, A. Yamada, P. Statham, Biometric security standards, in Encyclopedia of Biometrics, ed. by S.Z. Li, A.K. Jain, (Springer, Boston, 2009), pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  103. Biometric Institute., http://www.biometricsinstitute.org/

  104. Planet biometrics. Available: http://www.planetbiometrics.com/

  105. S. Elliott, JTC 1 SC 37 – Biometrics International Standards (Biometrics Standards, Performance, and Assurance Laboratory, Purdue University, US), 2002

    Google Scholar 

  106. ISO, ISO/IEC/SC 37 WG2 Biometric technical interfaces. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  107. JTC 1/SC 37/WG 3 Biometric data interchange formats. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  108. ISO, Biometric technologies and security, in International Biometric Standards Development Activities, vol. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 37, (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg)

    Google Scholar 

  109. JTC 1/SC 37/WG 4 Biometric functional architecture and related profiles. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  110. JTC 1/SC 37/WG 5 Biometric testing and reporting. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  111. ISO, Biometric performance testing and reporting, in Information Technology. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  112. ISO/IEC 19795 Series of International Standards: Information technology — Biometric performance testing and reporting, 2007–2012. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  113. JTC 1/SC 37/WG 6 Cross-Jurisdictional and Societal Aspects of Biometrics. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  114. N.B. Nill, Test procedures for verifying image quality requirements for personal identity verification (PIV) single finger capture devices, Centre for Integrated Intelligence Systems, Massachusetts, Report W15P7T-05-C-F600, Dec 2006

    Google Scholar 

  115. Current and Future Uses of Biometric Data and Technologies (Common Select Committee, Science and Technology Committee, London, UK, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  116. HECTOS Deliverable D4.1, Selected product types, use cases and validation criteria for biometric case studies, Harmonized Evaluation, Certification and Testing of Security products (HECTOS). (2015). Available: http://hectos-fp7.eu/dissemination.html

  117. HECTOS Deliverable D4.2, Working set of performance requirements and associated evaluation methodologies for the selected biometric case studies, Harmonized Evaluation, Certification and Testing of Security Products (HECTOS). (2016). Available: http://hectos-fp7.eu/dissemination.html

  118. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Off. J. L 281, 31–50 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  119. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27/WG 5, Standard on Identity management and privacy technologies. https://www.iso.org/committee/313770.html, 2002

  120. A. Shenoy, L. Meng, F. Rezwan, A. Ariyaeeinia, Retaining expression on de-identified faces, in International Biometric Performance Conference (IBPC), NIST, Gaithersburg, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  121. S. Marcel et al., Description of metrics for the evaluation of biometric performance, in BEAT Biometrics Evaluation and Testing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soodamani Ramalingam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Performance Metrics

Appendix A: Performance Metrics

In this appendix, we consider the notations and terminologies commonly used to evaluate biometric systems [121].

  • Gallery and probe sets: For purpose of performance evaluation, the feature set 𝐹 is divided into partitions of gallery G that forms the database of templates of enrolled subjects and probe P that forms the set of query samples. Depending on the specific performance metric to be determined, the elements of the gallery and probe sets, gG and ∊P, respectively, will vary. For example, the probe set could be a subset of the gallery during the training phase of a face recognition system and mutually exclusive during the testing phase.

  • Identification: Identification in a biometric system is the process of determining the identification of an individual from the database. The identification process matches a probe as a query against the gallery and returns similarity scores, ∀gG. The scores are usually normalised in the range [0,1].

  • Verification is the process of confirming that a claimed identity is correct by comparing the probe with one or more enrolled templates.

  • Open-set and close-set identification: Identification is close-set if a person is assumed to be previously enrolled and open-set otherwise (as in the case of a watch list whose identity is not known previously).

  • False acceptance rate (FAR) : an empirical estimate of the probability that an impostor has been falsely verified to bear a correct identification.

  • False rejection rate (FRR) : an empirical estimate of the probability that a person with true identification has been falsely rejected by the system.

  • Equal error rate (EER) : The rate at which FAR = FMR.

  • Identity function : A function id(g) that returns the identity as an integer indexing the database templates and given by\( id:\mathcal{X}\longrightarrow \mathcal{U} \) where \( \mathcal{U} \) is a set of unique identities. Let Ug denote these set of identities in G and Up the identities in P. As mentioned before, for some testing conditions of training and testing phases, Ug ∩ Up = ∅.

  • Identification rate: Closed-set performance evaluation requires the sorting of similarity scores during a matching process of the probe against the gallery which are now in a natural increasing order of ranking. The identification rate I(k) is defined as the fraction of probes at rank k or below:

    $$ I(k)=\frac{\mid \left\{b|\operatorname{rank}(b)\le k,\kern0.75em {\forall}_{b\in B}\right\}\mid }{\mid {U}_{\mathrm{p}}\mid }, $$

    where |Up| is the size of the probe set.

  • Cumulative match curve (CMC) : The CMC chart is a plot of k vs I(k). It is a non-decreasing function. The example in [121] is quoted here. If there are 100 probes and a system has 50 outputs with 50 rank 1 outcomes, 40 rank 2 outcomes, 5 rank 3 outcomes, 3 rank 4 outcomes and 2 rank 5 outcomes, then the number of elements with rank k or less is {50, 90, 95, 98, 100} for ranks k = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, respectively. Hence, the identification rate is 50% for rank 1 performance, 90% for rank 2 performance and so on. As k increases, the identification rate increases and eventually attains 100%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramalingam, S., Shenoy, A., Viet, N.T. (2019). Fundamentals and Advances in 3D Face Recognition. In: Obaidat, M., Traore, I., Woungang, I. (eds) Biometric-Based Physical and Cybersecurity Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98734-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98734-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98733-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98734-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics