Skip to main content

“Ein Spiel der Sinnlichkeit, durch den Verstand geordnet:” Kant’s Concept of Poetry and the Anthropological Revolution of Human Imagination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology

Abstract

The present essay proposes a new reading of Kant’s concept of poetry in his Lecture on Anthropology and within his anthropological thought in general. Rather than seeing poetry as merely an anthropological category or even as a disposition of the human spirit falling within the scope of anthropology, in this reading poetry is a key link between most of Kant’s anthropological topics and is therefore of paramount relevance for an understanding of Kant’s anthropological thought as a new science of human beings. In short, this reading aims to fill an important void in Kantian analysis. Until now, Kantian scholars have mostly failed to grasp the importance of Kant’s concept of poetry and, especially so, of Kant’s concept of poetry from a pragmatic point of view. The latter is neglected, or seen as the mere outcome of a special imaginative process—one which, however, is unrelatable to rationality, for poetry cannot be seen as a self-driven force, capable of enlivening the faculties of the spirit, nor as a driving force endowed with a purpose other than to delight or create new images. However, it is our view that Kant’s anthropological concept of poetry is indeed presented as relevant, especially in the sections devoted to the problem of human imagination [Einbildung]. Here, Kant proposes a revolution in the position, function, and whole joint disposition of the human faculties, one which displays the singularity of Kant’s proposition of a pragmatic anthropology as a science. In short, we aim to discover those potentialities that, to Kant, were unique in the human being’s poetic disposition; to show how Kant’s concept of poetry not only presupposes, but is also presupposed by an indeed revolutionary rearrangement of the inferior imaginative faculties; and to clarify how such a unique poetic disposition of the inferior faculties benefits the superior faculties, as well as rational knowledge, and hence fulfills a greater objective in Kant’s anthropology: to achieve that rare harmonious plane in human being’s state of mind which brings about a unique kind of anthropological pleasure—the pleasure of finding out something common to all mankind, which is clearly at the basis of the philosopher’s critical enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Perhaps due to that—quite deceptive—phenomenon, and because Kant is erroneously seen as but a critical philosopher, the topic has never been given due attention by Kant scholars. The same is the case with the remaining poetic faculties—as we shall attempt to demonstrate throughout this article. Among the few exceptions known to us, and dealing specifically with Kant’s concept of poetry, see Mclaughlin (2014), Penny (2008), Hlobil (2009), and Park (1968).

  2. 2.

    With regard to author citations, we use the following convention: work abbreviation, volume number, and page number. All citations were translated from the original German and/or Latin into the English language. Translations from the Critique of the Power of Judgment and the Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View are drawn from the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. As to the Lectures on Anthropology and the “Entwurf zu einer Opponenten-Rede”, translations are my own.

  3. 3.

    For further discussion, see Santos (2014) and Deuber-Mankowsky (2010), or the brief introductory essays on several translators of this piece, such as Meerbote (1992), Schmidt (1911), Catena (1998), or Meo (2000).

  4. 4.

    “The image which deceives, displeases; that of illusion is very pleasant and delights” (OR, AA 15.2: 907).

  5. 5.

    Poetry is the game of arbitrarily bringing an old form to a new form: the reinvention of representations or images which existed before under one form and which are now revitalized under one other, more creative, more subjective, but also more pleasant and rewarding form, and are hence held as that which was not there.

  6. 6.

    On this particular topic, and its poetic properties, see Best (1989), especially the sub-chapter “‘Hülle für die Vernunft‘: I Kant” (pp. 64–66); Ritzel (1991), Rodríguez (2013), or Silva (2015).

  7. 7.

    See V-Anth/Parow, AA 25.1: 312.

  8. 8.

    V-Anth/Mensch, AA 25.2: 1062.

  9. 9.

    On the particular topic of imagination and its importance within Kant’s critical edifice, much has been written. As to its relevance within Kant’s anthropological thought—as is here the case—however, not so much. Here we emphasize Brandt (1999), Cohen (2014), Dürbeck (1998), and Makowiak (2009).

  10. 10.

    Among other possible examples, we underscore Hume (1987 [1939]), Mason (1746), or Platner (1772).

  11. 11.

    See Platner (1772: §414–418).

  12. 12.

    See Hume (1987), Section Three (“Of the ideas of the memory and the imagination”).

  13. 13.

    “Imagination (Einbildung), independent from all sensible intuition, is designated as imagination (Imagination)” (V-Anth/Collins, AA 25.1: 78).

  14. 14.

    On the topic see V-Anth/Pillau, AA 25.1: 756; V-Anth/Busolt, AA 25.2: 1463; HN, AA 15.1: 148; Anth, AA 7: 182–184.

Bibliography

  • Best, Otto F. 1989. Der Witz als Erkenntniskraft und Formprinzip. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. 1999. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht [1798]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catena, Maria Teresa. 1998. Inganno e illusione. Un confronto accademico, 65–102. Napoli: Guida Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Alix (ed.). 2014. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuber-Mankowsky, Astrid. 2010. Ästhetische Illusion als Bestandteil des Wissens. Zu Kants Opponentenrede. In Ästhetisierung. Der Streit um das Ästhetische in Politik, Religion und Erkenntnis, ed. Ilka von Brombach, Dirk Setton, and Cornelia Temesvári, 67–83. Zürich: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürbeck, Gabriele. 1998. Einbildungskraft und Aufklärung. Perspektiven der Philosophie, Anthropologie und Ästhetik um 1750. New York and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlobil, Tomás. 2009. Immanuel Kant on Language and Poetry: Poetry Without Language. Kant-Studien 89 (1): 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1987. A Treatise of Human Nature [1739]. In Hume: The Essential Philosophical Works. Great Britain: Wordsworth Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1900 ff. Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg. Von der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Akademie-Ausgabe). Berlin: Georg Reimer (AA).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996 ff. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed. Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makowiak, Alexandra. 2009. Kant, l’imagination et la question de l’homme. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, John. 1746. Self-Knowledge: A Treatise, Shewing the Nature and Benefit of that Important Science. London: J. Waugh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclaughlin, Kevin. 2014. Poetic Force: Poetry After Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meerbote, Ralf. 1992. Concerning Sensory Illusion and Poetic Fiction. In Kant’s Latin Writings, 161–168. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meo, Oscar. 2000. Kantiana minora vel rariora. Genova: Il Melangolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Roy. 1968. Coleridge and Kant: Poetic Imagination and Practical Reason. The British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (4): 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penny, Laura. 2008. The Highest of All the Arts: Kant and Poetry. Philosophy and Literature 32: 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platner, Ernst. 1772. Anthropologie für Ärtzte und Weltweise. Leipzig: in der Dyckischen Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzel, Wolfgang. 1991. Kant über den Witz und Kants Witz. Kant-Studien 82 (1): 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Manuel Sánchez. 2013. Witz und reflektierende Urteilskraft in Kants Philosophie. In Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, vol. IV, ed. Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca, and Margit Ruffing, 487–496. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Leonel Ribeiro dos. 2014. Sobre a ilusão poética e a poética da ilusão. Estudos Kantianos 2 (2): 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Carl Christian Erhard. 1996. Wörterbuch zum leichtern Gebrauch der Kantischen Schriften, ed. Norbert Hinske. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1996 (W).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Bernhard Adolf. 1911. Eine bisher unbekannte lateinische Rede Kants über Sinnestäuschung und poetische Fiktion. Kant-Studien 16: 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Fernando M. F. 2015. “Zum Erfinden wird Witz erfordert“. On the Evolution of the Concept of ‘Witz’ in Kant’s Anthropology Lectures. In Kant’s Lectures/ Kants Vorlesungen, ed. Bernd Dörflinger, Claudio La Rocca, Robert Louden, and Ubirajara Marques Rancan de Azevedo, 121–132. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Silva, F.M.F. (2018). “Ein Spiel der Sinnlichkeit, durch den Verstand geordnet:” Kant’s Concept of Poetry and the Anthropological Revolution of Human Imagination. In: Lorini, G., Louden, R. (eds) Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98726-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics