Skip to main content

Controlling Mental Disorder: Kant’s Account of Mental Illness in the Anthropology Writings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to cast light on the account of mental illness that Kant offers in Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View and in the Lectures on Anthropology. First, I argue that Kant’s analysis of mental disorders is part of a more general task—viz., strengthening human theoretical and practical faculties through knowledge about the sources of their own flaws. Thus, the examination of these mental pathologies fulfills a therapeutic role within the larger scope of pragmatic anthropology. Second, I give an overview of Kant’s account of mental illnesses, highlighting the guidance given by the psychological structure of human faculties for breaking down the typologies discovered in the entangled field of what the philosophical tradition considered madness. Finally, I argue that what is most significant about Kant’s examination of mental maladies is not its continuity with medical physiological enquiries, since Kant does not harbor any expectation about the possibility of diagnosing and healing mental diseases through medicaments and surgical interventions. Rather, he believes that social intercourse is the proper means for emancipating the insane subject from the illusions of his self-created world. Ultimately, I shall claim that even if Kant shares with Rousseau the idea that most forms of derangement stem from social life, he believes that the social realm itself might be decidedly improved if subjects take into account the point of view of others. In a nutshell, Kant’s map of mental illnesses does not announce a fruitful dialogue with physicians, rather it confirms that a popular audience might be largely benefited in Kant’s view if it receives a detailed diagnosis of the most common mental pathologies. This information will forestall the sources of deficiencies and pathologies, willing away their effects in human epistemic processes and practical reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. VA-Fried, AA 25: 538–544; 2012: 101–105.

  2. 2.

    A more detailed account of these natural differences between human beings may be found in Cohen (2014: 78s).

  3. 3.

    See also Cohen (2014: 88–92).

  4. 4.

    Cf. VA-Fried, AA 25: 488; 2012: 62.

  5. 5.

    On this issue see Paul Guyer (2014).

  6. 6.

    I agree with the conclusion that Alix Cohen draws from Kant’s writings, see (2014: 92): “[F]ar from portraying human beings as disembodied pure mind, Kant’s account of cognition takes into account their empirical, contingent and messy features. These features, I have argued, comprise the subjective dimension of cognition that results from our nature as embodied beings whose cognition takes place in the natural world.”

  7. 7.

    See the insightful remark of Frierson about this decision, Frierson (2009a: 271): “The pragmatic nature of the work implies an emphasis on treatment or prevention of mental disorders. At the same time, however, Kant’s resistance to physiological approaches to the study of human nature narrows the scope of Kant’s emphasis on treatment and prevention. Kant does not discuss pharmacological treatments for mental disorder, or treatments that require specific consultation with a physician. His anthropology is a philosopher’s guide to help ordinary people with self-treatment […] not a medical guide for physicians.” Cf. ApH§ 51, AA 07: 213; 2006: 108: “The delirious raving (delirium) of a person who is awake and in a feverish state is a physical illness and requires medical attention. Only the delirious person in whom the physician perceives no such pathological occurrences is called mad; for which the word deranged is only a euphemistic expression.”

  8. 8.

    Frierson (2009a: 271–272).

  9. 9.

    Cf. VA-Fried, AA 25: 589; 2012: 142.

  10. 10.

    For a review of these disorders of human desire, see Frierson’s paper about affects and passions (2014: 100–112).

  11. 11.

    See ApH, AA 07: 161; 2006: 54.

  12. 12.

    For further discussion of hypochondria in Kant, see Shell (1996: 268–305).

  13. 13.

    Cf. ApH §66, AA 07: 239; 2012: 135: “The most thorough and easiest means of soothing all pains is the thought, which can well be expected of a reasonable human being, that life as such, with regard to our enjoyment of it, which depends on fortunate circumstances, has no intrinsic value of its own at all, and that life has value only as regards the use to which it is put, and the ends to which it is directed. […] He who is anxiously worried about losing his life will never enjoy life.”

  14. 14.

    Kant refers to a Keim der Verrückung in ApH, AA 07: 217; 2012: 111. Regarding the hereditary features of mental disorders, see Sloan (2002) and Munzel (1999).

  15. 15.

    See ApH §74, AA 07: 252; 2006: 150: “Affect is surprise through sensation, by means of which the mind’s composure (animus sui compos) is suspended.”

  16. 16.

    See Frierson (2009b: 14): “What Kant’s account of cognitive disorders shows, fundamentally, is the social character of truth. […] The only sort of critique that can truly ground objective knowledge of the world must be a social critique, one that can itself be criticized and refined by others.”

  17. 17.

    In my view it is plausible to consider Kant’s anthropology as a forerunner of the ‘critique of forms of life’ articulated recently by Rahel Jaeggi. Cf. the balance formulated by Frierson (2009b: 19).

  18. 18.

    See David-Ménard (2000: 87): “Kant is not the precursor of psychiatry. Let us say (since it is better to avoid the retrospective illusion that the notion of the precursor brings in) that the psychiatric discipline, when it emerges, will attempt to erase what appears explicitly in Kant’s text in its mordant humor, its polemic against medicine, and its final inclusion of the act writing an onomastic among the therapeutics of mental disturbance.”

Bibliography

  • Cohen, Alix (ed.). 2014. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David-Ménard, Monique. 2000. Kant’s Essay on the Maladies of the Mind and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime. Hypatia 15 (4): 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frierson, Patrick. 2009a. Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 1: An Overview. History of Psychiatry 20 (3): 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 2: Philosophical Implications of Kant’s Account. History of Psychiatry 20 (3): 290–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Affects and Passions. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, Paul. 2014. The Inclination Toward Freedom. In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Alice Cohen, 216–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meld Shell, Susan. 1996. The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzel, G.Felicitas. 1999. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Phillip. 2002. Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth-Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of Kant’s a Priori. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Sánchez Madrid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sánchez Madrid, N. (2018). Controlling Mental Disorder: Kant’s Account of Mental Illness in the Anthropology Writings. In: Lorini, G., Louden, R. (eds) Knowledge, Morals and Practice in Kant’s Anthropology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98726-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics