Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Business Model Innovation in the Era of the Internet of Things

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

  • 2321 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter summarizes limitations and avenues on future research on IoT business model innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., & Posselt, T. (2013). Business model innovations for electric mobility—What can be learned from existing business model patterns? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A. (2015). An MCDM approach towards M-payment business models evaluation. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(2), 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amshoff, B., Dülme, C., Echterfeld, J., & Gausemeier, J. (2015). Business model patterns for disruptive technologies. International Journal of Innovation Management, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Reuver, M., Bouwman, H., & Haaker, T. (2013). Business model roadmapping: A practical approach to come from an existing to a desired business model. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desyllas, P., & Sako, M. (2013). Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Research Policy, 42(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2014). The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaker, T., Bouwman, H., Janssen, W., & de Reuver, M. (2017). Business model stress testing: A practical approach to test the robustness of a business model. Futures, 89, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., & Venable, J. R. (2009). Action research and design science research—Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In ECIS 2009 Proceedings, No. Paper 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 336–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Designing business models and similar strategic objects: The contribution of IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation. Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, J.F. (2016). Discovering the role of scenario planning as an evaluation methodology for business models in the era of the internet of things (IoT). In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Vol. 24, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, D., Jr., & Williams, C. K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 787–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Research design issues in using the case study method to study management information systems. The Information Systems Research Challenge: Qualitative Research Methods, 1, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Jan F. Tesch

Authors
  1. Jan F. Tesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan F. Tesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Stuttgart, Germany

    Jan F. Tesch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tesch, J.F. (2019). Concluding Remarks. In: Tesch, J. (eds) Business Model Innovation in the Era of the Internet of Things. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98723-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation