Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

The following chapter outlines the motivation of the research endeavour, followed by concrete research gaps and research questions. Afterwards, the introduction provides an overview of the structure of the book, further elaborates on the research design and anticipated contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, P., & Mattsson, L.-G. (2015). Service innovations enabled by the “internet of things”. IMP Journal, 9(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K.-I. (2016). How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(08), 1640015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Grob, H. L., Klein, S., Kuchen, H., Müller-Funk, U., & Vossen, G. (2003). Forschungsmethodische Positionierung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Arbeitsbericht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgeri, D., Wortmann, F. (2017). Barriers to IoT business model innovation. In J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner (Hrsg.), Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017) (pp. 987–990). Switzerland: St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgeri, D., Brandt, V., Tesch, J., & Weinberger, M. (2015). The IoT business model builder. Available at: http://www.iot-lab.ch/?page_id=10738.

  • Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), S. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman, H., de Reuver, M., Solaimani, S., Daas, D., Haaker, T., Janssen, W., Iske, P., & Walenkamp, B. (2012). Business models tooling and a research agenda. Bled eConference, Vol. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucherer, E., Eisert, U., & Gassmann, O. (2012). Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, T., Krumeich, J., Werth, D., & Loos, P. (2011). Analyzing the business model concept—A comprehensive classification of literature. In ICIS 2011 Proceedings, no. 12 (pp. 1–19), Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanal, V., & Caron-Fasan, M. L. (2010). The difficulties involved in developing business models open to innovation communities: The case of a crowdsourcing platform. Management, 13(4), 318–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Urso, V. T., Herman, G., Lai, R. K., Malone, T. W., Weill, P. (2006). Do some business models perform better than others? Rev. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Sloan School of Management (Sloan working papers, 4615–06).

    Google Scholar 

  • El Sawy, O. A., & Pereira, F. (2013). Business modelling in the dynamic digital space: An ecosystem approach, SpringerBriefs in digital spaces. Berlin, New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisch, E. (2010). What is the internet of things? An economic perspective. Economics, Management & Financial Markets, 5(2), 125–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T., Csik, M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). The 4I-framework of business model innovation: A structured view on process phases and challenges. International Journal of Product Development, 18(3/4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2015). A paradigmatic analysis of digital application marketplaces. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, M., & Heikkilä, J. (2013). Collaborative business model innovation process for networked services. Co-created effective, agile, and trusted eServices (pp. 133–147).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L., & Ozanne, J. (1998). Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. Journal Consumer Research, 14(4), 508–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudien, S. M., Daxböck, B. (2016a). Business model innovation processes of average market players. A qualitative-empirical analysis. R&D Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudien, S. M., & Daxböck, B. (2016b). The influence of the industrial internet of things on business model design: A qualitative-empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(8), 1640014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The internet of things (IoT). Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C., & Goh, J. M. (2009). Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation. In need of better theory*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, S., & Testa, S. (2011). Beyond the conventional-specialty dichotomy in food retailing business models: An Italian case study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(5), 476–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2010). Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., de Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Clark, T. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 11–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2014). Research commentary—Information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective for future research. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society. The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation. Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Binns, A., Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), S. 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse Case. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., et al. (2014). Business models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Rajahonka, M. (2014). Designing business models for the internet of things. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(7), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, R. (2009). Design science as nested problem solving. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., & Göttel, V. (2016). Business models: Origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y. (2013). The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), S. 308–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2013). The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model. Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan F. Tesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tesch, J.F. (2019). Introduction. In: Tesch, J. (eds) Business Model Innovation in the Era of the Internet of Things. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98723-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics