Skip to main content

Designing a Process Mining-Enabled Decision Support System for Business Process Standardization in ERP Implementation Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 329))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process standardization allows to optimize ERP systems and is a necessary step prior to ERP implementation projects. Traditional approaches to standardizing business processes are based on manually created “de-jure” process models, which are distorted, error-prone, simplistic, and often deviating from process reality. Theoretically embedded in the organizational contingency theory as kernel theory, this paper employs a design science approach to design a process mining-enabled decision support system (DSS) which combines bottom-up process mining models with manually added top-down standardization information to recommend a suitable standard process specification from a repository. Extended process models of the as-is process are matched against a repository of best-practice standard process model using an attribute-based process similarity matching algorithm. Thus, the DSS aims to reduce the overall costs of process standardization, to optimize the degree of fit between the organization and the implemented processes, and to minimize the degree of organizational change required in standardization and ERP implementation projects. This paper implements a working prototype instantiation in the open-source process analytics platform Apromore based on a real-life event log and standardization attributes for the Purchase-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash processes from three SAP R/3 ERP systems at the industry partner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 172–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiwari, A., Turner, C.J., Majeed, B.: A review of business process mining: state-of-the-art and future trends. Bus. Process Manag. J. 14(1), 5–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Process mining: a research agenda. Process/Workflow Min. 53(3), 231–244 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining in the large: a tutorial. In: Zimányi, E. (ed.) Business Intelligence, vol. 172, pp. 33–76. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Business process modeling: perceived benefits. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5829, pp. 458–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: “Mine your own business”: using process mining to turn big data into real value. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loebbecke, C., Picot, A.: Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 149–157 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., et al.: Business process mining: an industrial application. Inf. Syst. 32(5), 713–732 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wurm, B., Schmiedel, T., Mendling, J. et al.: Development of a measurement scale for business process standardization. In: ECIS 2018 Research-In-Progress Papers (2018, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.A., Grabot, B.: A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems. Comput. Ind. 56(6), 510–522 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Apromore Initiative (2018). Apromore: Advanced Process Analytics Platform. http://apromore.org/about

  13. Donaldson, L.: The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sousa, R., Voss, C.A.: Contingency research in operations management practices. J. Oper. Manage. 26(6), 697–713 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Der Aalst, V., Wil, M.P., Dustdar, S.: Process mining put into context. IEEE Internet Comput. 16(1), 82–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Melão, N., Pidd, M.: A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Inf. Syst. J. 10(2), 105–129 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 486–495 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Škrinjar, R., Trkman, P.: Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33(1), 48–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Galbraith, J.R.: Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haußmann, C., Dwivedi, Y.K., Venkitachalam, K., et al.: A summary and review of Galbraith’s organizational information processing theory. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., Wade, M.R., Schneberger, S.L. (eds.) Information Systems Theory, vol. 29, pp. 71–93. Springer, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprague, R.H.: A framework for the development of decision support systems. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 4(4), 1 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer, M., Heim, D., Janiesch, C., et al.: Assessing process fit in ERP implementation projects: a methodological approach. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems 2017, Karlsruhe, Germany, 30 May–1 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change: A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nissinboim, N., Naveh, E.: Process standardization and error reduction: a revisit from a choice approach. Saf. Sci. 103, 43–50 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schönig, S., Cabanillas, C., Jablonski, S., et al.: A framework for efficiently mining the organisational perspective of business processes. Decis. Support Syst. 89, 87–97 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. Computer Science. IBM, San José (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Markus, M.L.: Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. J. Inf. Technol. 19(1), 4–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., et al.: Design science in information systems research. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 32(1), 1–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Afflerbach, P., Leonhard, F.: Customer experience versus process efficiency: towards an analytical framework about ambidextrous BPM: completed research paper. In: Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Martens, A., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: A genetic algorithm for the inductive derivation of reference models using minimal graph-edit distance applied to real-world business process data. In: Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 1613–1626 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Romero, H.L., Dijkman, R.M., Grefen, P.W.P.J., et al.: Factors that determine the extent of business process standardization and the subsequent effect on business performance. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(4), 261–270 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Becker, M., Laue, R.: A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Process/Workflow Min. 63(2), 148–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B.F., et al.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 498–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thaler, T., Schoknecht, A., Fettke, P., et al.: A comparative analysis of business process model similarity measures. In: BPM 2016 Workshops, pp. 310–322 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: On measuring process model similarity based on high-level change operations. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 248–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Ivanov, S.Y., Kalenkova, A.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: BPMNDiffViz: a tool for BPMN models comparison. Business Process Management Conference 2015 Demo Papers, Innsbruck, Austria, 31 August–3 September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J.: The ICoP framework: identification of correspondences between process models. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 483–498 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dijkman, R.M., van Dongen, B.F., Dumas, M., et al.: A short survey on process model similarity. In: Bubenko, J., Krogstie, J., Pastor, O., Pernici, B., Rolland, C., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering: 25 Years of CAiSE, pp. 421–427 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Fleig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fleig, C., Augenstein, D., Maedche, A. (2018). Designing a Process Mining-Enabled Decision Support System for Business Process Standardization in ERP Implementation Projects. In: Weske, M., Montali, M., Weber, I., vom Brocke, J. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 329. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98651-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98651-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98650-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98651-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics