The State and the Market

Fifth Dialogue


I read recently in a newspaper that neoliberalism is in crisis. Is that true?


  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015). Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angner, E. (2012). A course in behavioral economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Angner, E., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). Behavioral economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy and economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Batini, N., Callegari, G., & Melina, G. (2012). Successful austerity in the United States, Europe and Japan. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper, no. 12/190. Accessed May 2015.
  5. Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper, no. 13/1, January. Accessed Mar 2013.
  6. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity. The history of dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Repr. 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Blyth, M. (2016). Policies to overcome stagnation: The crisis, and the possible futures, of all things euro. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 13(2), 215–228.Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. J. (1999). Introduction: Which enlightenment, whose liberalism? Hayek’s research program for understanding the liberal society. In P. J. Boettke (Ed.), The legacy of Friedrich von Hayek. Volume I: Politics (pp. xi–lv). Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Bönker, F., & Wagener, H.-J. (2001). Hayek and Eucken on state and market economy. In A. Labrousse & J. D. Weisz (Eds.), Institutional economics in France and Germany. German ordoliberism versus the French regualtion school. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broyer, S. (2001). German contemporary analyses of economic order: Standard ordnungstheorie, ordoliberalism and ordnungsökonomik in perspective. In A. Labrousse & J. D. Weisz (Eds.), Institutional economics in France and Germany. German ordoliberism versus the French regulation school. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchanan, J. M. (1989). The public choice perspective. In J. M. Buchanan (Ed.), Essays on the political economy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cahill, D., & Konings, M. (2017). Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Calabresi, G. (1991). The pointlessness of Pareto: Carrying Coase further. The Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1211–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caldwell, B. (2003). Hayek’s challenge. An intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, P. (2009). Keynes. The twentieth century’s most influential economist. London: Bloomsbury. Repr. 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, D. H., Epstein, G., & McGinnis, M. D. (2014). Digging deeper into Hardin’s pasture: The complex institutional structure of ‘the tragedy of the commons’. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(3), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crouch, C. (2017). Can neoliberalism be saved from itself? London: Social Europe Edition.Google Scholar
  19. Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape. Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. The Economist. (2012, July 14). Rehabilitating capitalism. For those who have lost faith.Google Scholar
  21. The Economist. (2015, September 26). The Volkswagen scandal. A mucky business.Google Scholar
  22. The Economist. (2016, July 23). Information asymmetry. Secrets and agents.Google Scholar
  23. The Economist. (2017, July 1). Takata’s bankruptcy. The danger of inflation.Google Scholar
  24. The Economist. (2017, July 29). German carmakers. Exhausted. Firms are hit by anti-pollution plans and allegations of collusion.Google Scholar
  25. Egidi, M. (1996). Routines, hierarchies of problems, procedural behaviour: Some evidence from experiments. In K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, & M. Perlman (Eds.), The rational foundations of economic behavior. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Egidi, M. (2002). Biases in organizational behavior. In M. Augier & J. G. March (Eds.), The economics of choice, change and organization. Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom, with the Assistance of Rose D. Friedman, 40th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. (1995). Interview with Milton Friedman on Friedrich Hayek. In L. Ebenstein (Ed.) (2015), Chicagonomics. The evolution of Chicago free market economics. New York: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar
  29. Galbraith, J. K. (2004). The economics of innocent fraud: Truth for our time. London and New York: Allen Lane-Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Giacché, V. (2013). Anschluss. L’annessione. L’unificazione della Germania e il futuro dell’Europa. Reggio Emilia: Imprimatur. Repr. 2014. German edition: Giacché, V. (2014). Anschluss: Die deutsche Vereinigung und die Zukunft Europas. Erschienen: Laika Verlag. French edition: Giacché, V. (2015). Le second Anschluss: l’annexion de la RDA: L’unification de l’Allemagne et l’avenir de l’Europe. Paris: Les éditions Delga.Google Scholar
  31. Giocoli, N. (2016). Truth or precision? Some reflections on the economists’ failure to predict the financial crisis. Review of Austrian Economics. Accessed Apr 2016.
  32. Hadeed, M. (2107, October 2). The ordoliberal ghost. Social Europe. Accessed Sept 2017.
  33. Haiven, M. (2016). The commons against neoliberalism, the commons of neoliberalism, the commons beyond neoliberalism. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism. New York-London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hargreaves Heap, S. P. (2013). What is the meaning of behavioural economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(), 985–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hayek, F. A. Von. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4(13), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Klamer, A. (1983). Conversations with economists: New classical economists and opponents speak out on the current controversy in macroeconomics. Totowa, N.J: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
  41. Köhler, E., & Kolev, S. (2011). The conjoint quest for a liberal positive program: ‘Old Chicago’, Freiburg and Hayek. HWWI Research Paper, no. 109. Accessed May 2016.
  42. Lucas, R. E. (1980). The death of Keynesian economics. Winter: Issues and Ideas.Google Scholar
  43. Luzzati, T. (1999). A piece of evidence regarding the full rationality of economic agents. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(3), 567–572.Google Scholar
  44. Maris, B. (1999). Lettre ouverte aux gourous de l’économie qui nous prennent pour des imbéciles. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  45. Marx, K. (1867a). Das kapital. Buch I. English edition: Marx, K. (1976). Capital. Volume 1 (trans: Fowkes, B.). London: Pelican Book. Repr., London: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review (1990).Google Scholar
  46. Marx, K. (1867b). Das kapital. Buch II. English edition: Marx K. (1978). Capital. Volume 2 (trans: Fernbach, D.) London: Pelican Books. Repr. London: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review, 1992.Google Scholar
  47. Marx, K. (1894). Das kapital. Buch III. English edition: Marx, K. (1981). Capital. Volume 3 (trans: Fernbach, D.). London: Pelican Books. 1981. Repr. London: Penguin Classics in association with New Left Review, 1991.Google Scholar
  48. McFadden, D. (1999). Rationality for economists? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Medema, S. G. (2009). The hesitant hand. Taming self-interest in the history of economic ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Repr. 2011.Google Scholar
  50. Metcalf, S. (2017, August 18). Neoliberalism: the idea that swallowed the world. The Guardian. Accessed Aug 2017.
  51. Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2014). House of debt. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, W., & Fazi, T. (2017). Reclaiming the state. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Monbiot, G. (2016, April 15). Neoliberalism – the ideology at the root of all our problems. The Guardian. Accessed Apr 2016.
  55. Morroni, M. (2006). Knowledge, scale and transactions in the theory of the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.ù.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ostrom, E., & Crawford, S. E. S. (1995). A grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (Eds.). (2006). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P., & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold? Finance & Development (pp. 38–41). Accessed June 2016.
  61. Petri, F. (2018). Class struggle and hired prize-fighters. A Marx-inspired perspective on the present state of economic theory and its social causes. STOREP 2018 Conference, 28–30 June, Genova. Accessed June 2018.
  62. Piketty, T. (2013). The capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Pitelis, C. (1991). Market and non-market hierarchies. Theory of institutional failure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press. 2nd edition 2001.Google Scholar
  65. Posner, R. A. (2009). A failure of capitalism. The crisis of ’08 and the descent into depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). Saving capitalism from capitalists. Unleashing the power of financial markets to create wealth and spread opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rapley, J. (2017, July 17). How economics became a religion. The Guardian. Accessed Aug 2017.
  68. Rodrik, D. (2017, November 6). Rescuing economics from neoliberalism. Boston Review. Accessed Nov 2017.
  69. Rodrik, D. (2018, June 11). How democrat is the euro? Project Syndicate. Accessed June 2018.
  70. Röpke, W. (1942). Die gesellschaftskrisis der gegenwart Erlenbach-Zurich: Verlag. 1942. English edition: Röpke, W. (1950). The social crisis of our time (trans: Röpke, W.). London: W. Hodge & C.Google Scholar
  71. Röpke, W. (1948). Civitas humana. A humane order of society. London: W. Hodge & C.Google Scholar
  72. Röpke, W. (1957). Welfare, freedom and inflation. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
  73. Roubini, N., & Mihm, S. (2010). Crisis economics. A crash course in the future finance. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  74. Samuelson, P. (2005). Letter from Paul Samuelson about Milton Friedman. In L. Ebenstein (Ed.), (2015), Chicagonomics. The evolution of Chicago free market economics (pp. 2018–2019). New York: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sandel, M. J. (2013). Market reasoning as moral reasoning: Why economists should re-engage with political philosophy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(4), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schechter, A. (2017, March 28). Richard Posner: ‘The real corruption is the ownership of congress by the rich’. ProMarket. Accessed Oct 2017.
  77. Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Screpanti, E. (2013). L’imperialismo globale e la grande crisi: L’incerto futuro del capitalismo. Rome: English edition: Screpanti, E. (2014). Global imperialism and the great crisis: The uncertain future of capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  79. Screpanti, E. (2018, January 5). Another Europe is needed. Lexit-Network. Accessed Jan 2018.
  80. Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  81. Shiller, R. J. (2015). Fraud, fools, and financial markets. Project Syndicate.—shiller-2015-09. Accessed Oct 2015.
  82. Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In S.J. Latsis (Ed.), Method and appraisal in economics (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Repr. In H. A. Simon, Models of bounded rationality. Volume two. Behavioral economics and business organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982, pp. 424-443.Google Scholar
  83. Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25–44. repr. In C. Ménard (Ed.), Controversies and challenges in the new institutional economics. An Elgar Reference Collection, The International Library of the New Institutional Economics (Vol. 7). Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  84. Sinn, H.-W. (2014, November 1). In defence of the profession. Sueddeutsche. Accessed Dec 2014.
  85. Skidelsky, R. (2006). Hayek versus Keynes: The road to reconciliation. In E. Feser (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Accessed Apr 2016.
  86. Soros, G. (2014). Fallibility, reflexivity, and the human uncertainty principle. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(4). Accessed June 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). On the economic role of the state. In A. Heertje (Ed.), the economic role of the state. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  89. Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Foreword. In K. Polanyi (Ed.) (1944), The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  90. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Information and the change in paradigm in economics. In R. Arnott, B. Greenwald, R. Kanbur, & B. Nalebuff (Eds.), Economics in an imperfect world. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  91. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010a). Government failure vs. market failure: Principles of regulation. In E. J. Balleisen & D. A. Moss (Eds.), Government and markets. Toward a new theory of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010b). Freefall. America, free markets, and the sinking of the global economy. London and New York: Allen Lane-Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  93. Summers, L. H. (2016, February 15). The age of secular stagnation. What it is and what to do about it. Foreign Affairs. Accessed June 2016.
  94. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  95. Wren Lewis, S. J. (2015, November 6). Bernanke on austerity and fiscal charter. Mainly Macro. Accessed Nov 2015.
  96. Wren Lewis, S. J. (2016, May 2). Neoliberalism. Mainly Macro. Accessed May 2016.
  97. Zingales, L. (2012). Capitalism for the people. Recapturing the lost genius of American prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  98. Zingales, L. (2017). Towards a political theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations