Skip to main content

Ownership Inheritance from External Advocate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Ownership in Asian Peacebuilding

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

The case study chapters of this volume examine four behavioural patterns of local peacebuilders as stated above. They examine how the four types of ownership promotion have been employed in the two areas, focusing specifically on the strategies local actors utilize to develop their unique models of peacebuilding, the distinguishing features of each of these, and their limitations as models of authentically local peacebuilding. This chapter introduces the ownership inheritance cases where local actors strengthen their commitment to the peacebuilding programmes concerned through external actors’ voluntary ownership transfer. Such ownership inheritance frequently takes place while an organisation initially established by external peacebuilding actors attempts to localise. In other cases, local actors’ high-level of commitment is designed and encouraged by external advocates from the outset. Successful development of ownership inheritance brings about high levels of local ownership in terms of the organizational structure of peacebuilding agencies and the decision making process, where local representatives assume important roles. From a theoretical perspective, the chapter discusses that the local peacebuilders who inherit the ownership are likely to present different forms of norm diffusion and internalisation, adopting and internalising the value systems or core objectives set by the donor agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lupong Tagapamayapa, or Pacification Committees, is a community-based extrajudicial conflict resolution scheme. This committee system usually deals with minor disputes between residents within a same barangay, and, while it does not have judicial punishment power, the decisions made in Lupong Tagapamayapa are normally considered binding in many local communities.

  2. 2.

    See Chapter 7 for a more comprehensive review of the literature on norm diffusion and localisation .

References

  • Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, Fiona. 2005. Global Liberalism Versus Political Islam: Competing Ideological Frameworks in International Politics. International Studies Review 7: 547–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettiza, Gregorio, and Filippo Dionigi. 2014. Beyond Constructivism’s Liberal Bias: Islamic Norm Entrepreneurs in a Post-secular World Society. EUI Working Paper 10, Badia Fiesolana, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkdhal, Annika. 2013. Ideas and Norms in Swedish Peace Policy. Swiss Political Science Review 19 (3): 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesenecker, Aaron, and Leslie Vinjamuri. 2011. Lost in Translation? Civil Society, Faith-Based Organizations and the Negotiation of International Norms. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5: 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Nell, and Myla Leguro. 2015. Local Solutions to Land Conflict in Mindanao. Manila: CRS Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacker, Thorsten, Judith von Heusinger, and Kerstin Zimmer. 2017. Localization in Development Aid: How Global Institutions Enter Local Lifeworlds. Basingstoke: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulia, Sreeram. 2007. International Organisations in Mindanao: To Protect or Not? The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (February 1). Available at https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/21. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.

  • Cobb, Neil. 2014. Rethinking the ‘World Polity’ Perspective on Global Sodomy Law Reform. In Handbook of LGBT Communities, Crime, and Justice, ed. D. Peters and V.R. Panfil, 283–310. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cortell, Andrew, and James Davis. 2000. Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review 2 (1): 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota, Bharat Prasad. 2013. Nationalisation of International NGO Programmes and Institutions: Transformation of Development Institutions in the Context of Cambodia. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPA. 2017. Development and Partnership in Action Website. Available at http://dpacam.org. Accessed 2 Feb 2016.

  • Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiwasa, Ayako. 2014. Changing Gendered Boundaries in Rural Cambodia. In Southeast Asia and the Civil Society Gaze: Scoping a Contested Concept in Cambodia and Vietnam, ed. Gabi Waibel, Judith Ehlert, and Hart Feuer. London: Routledge (e-book).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Mathias, and Julian Dierkes. 2012. Conflict in the World Polity: Neo-institutional Perspectives. Acta Sociologica 54 (1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jeong-Hye. 2017. The Life and Learning in Banteay Prieb in Cambodia: Focusing on People-Centered Development in Technical Vocational Education and Training. Master’s dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, SungYong, and Alpaslan Özerdem (eds.). 2015. Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, SungYong, and Wookbeom Park. 2015. Nurturing Local Voice: The UNDP’s Local Empowerment Programmes in Cambodia. In Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues, ed. SungYong Lee and Alpaslan Özerdem, 135–155. London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leguro, Myla, and the A3B Project Team. 2017. Mindanao: Binding, Bonding and Bridging. In Interreligious Action for Peace, ed. Tom Bamat, Nell Bolton, Myla Leguro, and Atalia Omer, 71–83. Baltimore, MD: Catholic Relief Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luco, Fabienne. 2002. Between a Tiger and a Crocodile. Phnom Penh: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger, and Gurchathen Sanghera. 2012. Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development: An Introduction. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (2): 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Jenny. 2012. A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-Driven Interfaces. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (2): 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Oliver, and Audra Mitchell. 2012. Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas. 2002. Transnational Actors and World Politics. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thoms Risse, and Beth Simmons. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.). 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Rosalind, and Lars Waldorf (eds.). 2010. Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2012. Post-conflict Justice and Hybridity in Peacebuilding. In Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism, ed. Oliver Richmond and Audra Mitchell, 58–72. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2013. Land: Territory, Domain, and Identity. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/968161490797321335/pdf/113866-WP-P156212-GSU02-PUBLIC-Land-Territory-Domain-and-Identity-Web.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2018.

  • Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2016. Same Same or Different? Norm Diffusion Between Resistance, Compliance, and Localization in Post-conflict State. International Studies Perspectives 17 (1): 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SungYong Lee .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, S. (2019). Ownership Inheritance from External Advocate. In: Local Ownership in Asian Peacebuilding . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98611-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics