Skip to main content

Predicting Learners’ Success in a Self-paced MOOC Through Sequence Patterns of Self-regulated Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2018)

Abstract

In the past years, predictive models in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have focused on forecasting learners’ success through their grades. The prediction of these grades is useful to identify problems that might lead to dropouts. However, most models in prior work predict categorical and continuous variables using low-level data. This paper contributes to extend current predictive models in the literature by considering coarse-grained variables related to Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). That is, using learners’ self-reported SRL strategies and MOOC activity sequence patterns as predictors. Lineal and logistic regression modelling were used as a first approach of prediction with data collected from N = 2,035 learners who took a self-paced MOOC in Coursera. We identified two groups of learners: (1) Comprehensive, who follow the course path designed by the teacher; and (2) Targeting, who seek for the information required to pass assessments. For both type of learners, we found a group of variables as the most predictive: (1) the self-reported SRL strategies ‘goal setting’, ‘strategic planning’, ‘elaboration’ and ‘help seeking’; (2) the activity sequences patterns ‘only assessment’, ‘complete a video-lecture and try an assessment’, ‘explore the content’ and ‘try an assessment followed by a video-lecture’; and (3) learners’ prior experience, together with the self-reported interest in course assessments, and the number of active days and time spent in the platform. These results show how to predict with more accuracy when students reach a certain status taking in to consideration not only low-level data, but complex data such as their SRL strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Coursera MOOC: Electrones en acción

  2. 2.

    SRL measure questionnaire in Spanish and English are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1581491.

References

  1. Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining: data science in action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bannert, M.: Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychol. 23(2), 139–145 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Barba, P.G., et al.: The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 32(3), 218–231 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boekaerts, M.: Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn. Instr. 7(2), 161–186 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinton, C.G., et al.: Mining MOOC clickstreams: video-watching behavior vs. in-video quiz performance. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 64(14), 3677–3692 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Broadbent, J.: Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet High. Educ. 33, 24–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Broadbent, J., Poon, W.L.: Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review. Internet High. Educ. 27, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chuang, I., Ho, A.D.: HarvardX and MITx: Four Years of Open Online Courses–Fall 2012-Summer 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Corrin, L., et al.: Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 424–428 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, D., et al.: Activating learning at scale: a review of innovations in online learning strategies. Comput. Educ. 125, 327–344 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grainger, B.: Massive open online course (MOOC) report 2013. University of London. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Günther, C.W., Rozinat, A.: Disco: discover your processes. Bus. Process Manag. 940, 40–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hood, N., et al.: Context counts: how learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Comput. Educ. 91, 83–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kizilcec, R.F., et al.: Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput. Educ. 104, 18–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocdar, S., et al.: Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19, 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kovanović, V. et al.: Penetrating the black box of time-on-task estimation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK 2015. October, pp. 184–193 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Littlejohn, A., et al.: Learning in MOOCs: motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet High. Educ. 29, 40–48 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maldonado-Mahauad, J., et al.: Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 179–196 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maldonado, J.J., et al.: Exploring differences in how learners navigate in MOOCs based on self-regulated learning and learning styles: A process mining approach. In: Computing Conference (CLEI), 2016 XLII Latin American, pp. 1–12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mezaour, A.-D.: Filtering web documents for a thematic warehouse case study: eDot a food risk data warehouse (extended). In: Kłopotek, M.A., Wierzchoń, S.T., Trojanowski, K. (eds.) Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining. Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 31, pp. 269–278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32392-9_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno-Marcos, P.M., et al.: Analysing the predictive power for anticipating assignment grades in a massive open online course. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37(5), 1–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pardo, A. et al.: Generating actionable predictive models of academic performance. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 474–478 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reich, J.: Rebooting MOOC research. Science 347(6217), 34–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sinha, T. et al.: Your click decides your fate: Inferring information processing and attrition behavior from mooc video clickstream interactions. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1407.7131. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu, B., Yang, D.: Motivation classification and grade prediction for MOOCs learners. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2016, 4 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. You, J.W.: Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. Internet High. Educ. 29, 23–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao, C., et al.: Discover learning behavior patterns to predict certification. In: 2016 11th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), pp. 69–73 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by FONDECYT (Chile) under project initiation grant No.11150231, the MOOC-Maker Project (561533-EPP-1-2015-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP), the LALA Project (586120-EPP-1-2017-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP), and CONICYT/DOCTORADO NACIONAL 2016/21160081, the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, under an FPU fellowship (FPU016/00526) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (Smartlet project, grant number TIN2017-85179-C3-1-R) funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Moreno-Marcos, P.M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Predicting Learners’ Success in a Self-paced MOOC Through Sequence Patterns of Self-regulated Learning. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds) Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11082. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98571-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98572-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics