Journalism Norms and the Absence of Media Populism in the Irish General Election 2016

  • Eileen Culloty
  • Jane Suiter
Part of the Political Campaigning and Communication book series (PCC)


The 2007 financial crisis and consequent programme of austerity brought deep disruption to Irish politics and exasperated public hostility towards mainstream politics and so-called elites. As the 2016 Irish General Election marked a historic low in support for established parties, this chapter examines the extent to which Irish news media inflamed populist and anti-political sentiment. Within the context of intensified mediatization (Mazzoleni, Mediatization of Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014) and widespread disaffection with political institutions, we expect to find that particular types of media, specifically tabloid and new digital media, enable anti-elite populist messaging by reflecting a higher tendency towards strategic game frames and personalization. However, we find that although the strategic game frame dominates coverage, only 2 per cent of stories reference any form of elitism and only 12 per cent manifest a definite populist rhetoric. These findings are discussed in terms of the prevailing values of professional journalism norms in Irish media.


  1. Aalberg, T., & De Vreese, C. (2017). Introduction: Comprehending populist communication in Europe. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, & J. Stromback (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 3–12). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, S. D., & Barthel, M. L. (2015). The friendly barbarians: Professional norms and work routines of online journalists in the United States. Journalism, 16(3), 376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy (pp. 1–11). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archetti, C. (2010). Explaining News: National Politics and Journalistic Cultures in Global Context. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnhurst, K. G. (2003). The makers of meaning: National Public Radio and the new long journalism, 1980–2000. Political Communication, 20(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication, 13(4), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. (2011). How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders. Political Communication, 28(2), 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandenburg, H. (2005). Political bias in the Irish media: A quantitative study of campaign coverage during the 2002 general election. Irish Political Studies, 20(3), 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, H. (2016, March 14). Biased Media: Election 2016. Village Magazine. Retrieved from
  10. Buckley, F., Galligan, Y., & McGing, C. (2016). Women and the Election: Assessing the impact of gender quotas. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland Voted 2016: The Election That Nobody Won (pp. 185–205). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conboy, M. (2011). Journalism in Britain: A Historical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Corcoran, M. (2004). The political preferences and value orientations of Irish journalists. Irish Journal of Sociology, 13(2), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dimitrova, D., & Kostadinova, P. (2013). Identifying antecedents of the strategic game frame: A longitudinal analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Djerf-Pierre, M., & Weibull, L. (2008). From public educator to interpreting ombudsman: Regimes of political journalism in Swedish public service broadcasting 1925–2005. In J. Strömbäck, M. Ørsten, & T. Aalberg (Eds.), Communicating Politics: Political Communication in the Nordic Countries (pp. 195–214). Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar
  16. Ellinas, A. (2010). The Media and the Far Right in Western Europe: Playing the Nationalist Card. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esser, F., Stępińska, A., & Hopmann, D. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Farrell, D., & Suiter, J. (2016). The Election in context. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland Voted 2016: The Election That Nobody Won (pp. 277–292). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fink, K., & Schudson, M. (2014). The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s–2000s. Journalism, 15(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzgibbon, J., & Guerra, S. (2010). Not just Europeanization, not necessarily populism: Potential factors underlying the mobilization of populism in Ireland and Poland. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hernandez, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho, B., & Liu, P. (2015). Herd journalism: Investment in novelty and popularity in markets for news. Information Economics and Policy, 31, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirk, N., McNamara, P., Culloty, E., & Suiter, S. (2016). Reuters Digital News Report: Ireland. Dublin: Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.Google Scholar
  27. Kitching, D. (2013). Hostage takers and gatekeepers: Populism and its potential in the Republic of Ireland. In S. Rizzo & D. Kitching (Eds.), The Changing Faces of Populism: Systemic Challenges in Europe and the US (pp. 125–146). Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  28. Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mair, P. (2011). The election in context. In How Ireland Voted 2011 (pp. 283–297). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in Journalism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Marsh, M. (2007). Candidates or parties? Objects of electoral choice in Ireland. Party Politics, 13(4), 500–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marsh, M. (2009). Voting behaviour. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (pp. 168–197). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, M., & McElroy, G. (2016). Voting behaviour: Continuing de-alignment. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland Voted 2016: The Election that Nobody Won (pp. 159–184). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mazzoleni, G. (2014). Mediatization and political populism. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of Politics (pp. 42–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mazzoleni, G., Stewart, J., & Horsfield, B. (Eds.). (2003). The Media and Neo-populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. McDonnell, D. (2008). The Republic of Ireland: The dog that hasn’t barked in the night. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy (pp. 198–210). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McMenamin, I., Flynn, R., O’Malley, E., & Rafter, K. (2012). Commercialism and election framing: A content analysis of twelve newspapers in the 2011 Irish General Election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, G. (2016). The background to the election. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds.), How Ireland Voted 2016 (pp. 1–26). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Newsbrands Ireland. (2016). Circulation. Retrieved from
  41. O’Brien, M., & Ó’Beacháin, D. (Eds.). (2014). Political Communication in the Republic of Ireland. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Malley, E. (2008). Why is there no radical right party in Ireland? West European Politics, 31(5), 960–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Malley, E., Brandenburg, H., Flynn, R., McMenamin, I., & Rafter, K. (2014a). The impact of the crisis on media framing: Evidence from three elections in Ireland. European Political Science Review, 6(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Malley, E., Brandenburg, H., Flynn, R., McMenamin, I., & Rafter, K. (2014b). Explaining media framing of election coverage: Bringing in the political context. European Political Science Review, 6(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Malley, E., & FitzGibbon, J. (2015). Everywhere and nowhere: Populism and the puzzling non-reaction to Ireland’s crises. In H. Kriesi & T. Pappas (Eds.), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession (pp. 287–302). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  46. Quinlan, S. (2016). Understanding Election 2016: Perspectives from Eurobarometer 84. Irish Politics Forum. Retrieved February 25, 2017, from
  47. Rafter, K. (2009). Run out of the gallery: The changing nature of Irish political journalism. Irish Communication Review, 11(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
  48. Rafter, K. (2014). Voices in the crisis: The role of media elites in interpreting Ireland’s banking collapse. European Journal of Communication, 29(5), 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rafter, K., Flynn, R., McMenamin, I., & O’Malley, E. (2014). Does commercial orientation matter for policy-game framing? A content analysis of television and radio news programmes on public and private stations. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Interpretive journalism: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salgado, S. (with contributions of Balabanic, I., Garcia-Luengo, Ó., Mustapic, M., Papathanassopoulos, S., Stępińska, A.). (2015). Elections news in six European countries: What is covered and how?—Study for research project. Retrieved from
  52. Schedler, A. (1996). Anti-political-establishment parties. Party Politics, 2, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Exploring some antecedents of the media’s framing of election news: A comparison of Swedish and Belgian election news. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suiter, J. (2016). The rise of populism on the left and among independents. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 127–136). Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vos, T. (2012). ‘Homo journalisticus’: Journalism education’s role in articulating the objectivity norm. Journalism, 13(4), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eileen Culloty
    • 1
  • Jane Suiter
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Communications, Dublin City UniversityDublinRepublic of Ireland
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinRepublic of Ireland

Personalised recommendations