Skip to main content

Managing Portfolio Entrepreneurship: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The start-up of new ventures is relevant for innovation and growth in the small firm sector. Empirical evidence has shown that new venture creation by established entrepreneurs is often carried out through the setting up of new firms to involve other people in the ownership and control of the new business. The aim of this chapter is to investigate the mechanisms through which established entrepreneurs build entrepreneurial teams to develop new businesses and how these teams evolve over time. The empirical analysis is based on a case study of a habitual entrepreneur who set up several firms during a 50-year period. In-depth interviews were conducted with the entrepreneur and the other people that were subsequently involved in the development of the new businesses. The interviews clarified the motives for such involvement and shed new insights on two issues: the one entrepreneur-one business principle and about the dynamic of entrepreneurial teams in knowledge-intensive businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alvarez and Barney (2004) suggest another argument to explain this. If it was possible to write incentive contracts for managers, this means that knowledge about the new business opportunities and its potential results is ‘common’ knowledge. In this case, the salaried manager, hired to take advantage of this opportunity, will appropriate most of the economic rents associated with it.

  2. 2.

    “An army of supervisors may be just as efficient (provided it consists of men of equal ability) as one supervisor alone” (Kaldor 1934, p. 68).

References

  • Aldrich, Howard E., and Martin Ruef. 2006. Organizations Evolving. London: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, Sharon A., and Jay B. Barney. 2004. Organizing Rent Generation and Appropriation: Toward a Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm. Journal of Business Venturing 19 (5): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Shona L., and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 1997. The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, Camille. 1994. Intrapreneurship in Large Firms and SMEs: A Comparative Study. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 12 (3): 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark. 1995. Entrepreneurship and Business Culture. Aldershot, Hants/Brookfield: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Entrepreneurship and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58 (2): 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, Thomas M. 2005. Editorial: What Is an Entrepreneurial Team? International Small Business Journal 23 (3): 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, David L., Dona Decarolis, and Joseph Coombs. 2000. Dynamic Capabilities and New Product Development in High Technology Ventures – A Case Study. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (3): 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, Gregory G., Duane R. Ireland, Shaker A. Zahra, Steven W. Floyd, Jay J. Janney, and Peter J. Lane. 2003. Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 29 (3): 351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/11): 1105–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, Sharon. 1998a. Limited Entrepreneurial Attention and Economic Development. Small Business Economics 10 (1): 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. The Allocation of Limited Entrepreneurial Attention. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, David A. 1996. Entrepreneurship and the Market Process: An Enquiry into the Growth of Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Towards a Theory of Entrepreneurial Teams. Journal of Business Venturing 23 (6): 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, Donato, and Peter Rosa. 2010. The Growth of Business Groups by Habitual Entrepreneurs: The Role of Entrepreneurial Teams. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 34 (2): 351–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, RDuane D., Jeffrey G. Covin, and Donald F. Kuratko. 2009. Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 33 (1): 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Nicholas. 1934. The Equilibrium of the Firm. Economic Journal 44 (173): 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzy, Bernhard R., Marcel C. Dissel, and Franziska S. Blindow. 2001. Dynamic Capabilities for Entrepreneurial Venturing – The Siemens ICE Case. In Management of Technology, ed. M. Von Zedtwitz, 3–22. Lausanne: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Richard N., and Paul L. Robertson. 1995. Firms, Markets and Economic Change. A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Christian, and Christophe Leyronas. 2009. Small-Business Group Formation as an Entrepreneurial Development Model. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 33 (3): 645–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram G., and Luigi Zingales. 2000. The Governance of the New Enterprise. NBER Working Paper 7958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Peter. 1998. Entrepreneurial Processes of Business Cluster Formation and Growth by “Habitual” Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 22 (4): 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Peter, and Michael Scott. 1999a. Entrepreneurial Diversification, Business-Cluster Formation, and Growth. Environment and Planning C 17 (5): 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999b. The Prevalence of Multiple Owners and Directors in the SME Sector: Implications for Our Understanding of Start-up and Growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11 (1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, Saras, and Anil Menon. 2004. Failing Firms and Successful Entrepreneurs: Serial Entrepreneurship as a Simple Machine. Darden Business School Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautet, Frédéric E. 2000. An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Pramodita, and James J. Chrisman. 1999. Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (3): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 2007. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, Mary, and Giovanni Gavetti. 2000. Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/11): 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, Deniz, Gry Agnete Alsos, Paul Westhead, and Mike Wright. 2008. Habitual Entrepreneurs. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 4 (4): 309–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verona, Gianmario, and Davide Ravasi. 2003. Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (3): 577–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Daniel F. Jennings, and Donald F. Kuratko. 1999a. The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 24 (2): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., Donald F. Kuratko, and Daniel F. Jennings. 1999b. Entrepreneurship and the Acquisition of Dynamic Organizational Capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (3): 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Rosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iacobucci, D., Rosa, P. (2019). Managing Portfolio Entrepreneurship: A Case Study. In: Rautiainen, M., Rosa, P., Pihkala, T., Parada, M.J., Cruz, A.D. (eds) The Family Business Group Phenomenon. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98542-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics