Advertisement

Designing Service Systems to Enhance Perceived Decision Control

  • Sriram DasuEmail author
  • Alexandra Brunner-Sperdin
Chapter
  • 1.7k Downloads
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

The primary purpose of many service encounters is to make decisions. This is particularly true in professional services such as financial services, healthcare, and real estate. In each encounter, many decisions have to be made. Some are trivial while others are highly consequential. The role of the customer in these decisions has a bearing on the outcome, customer’s overall assessment of the service encounter, and the cost and complexity of delivering the service. Thus to design service encounters it is important to understand when customers seek decision control and how this control is influenced by the actions of the service provider. In this article, we explore behavioral science literature to identify factors that influence customer’s desired role in decision making. It is well known, that trust influences the desire for decision control. This article identifies different dimensions of trust and how trust is influenced by the actions of the service provider.

Keywords

Decision control Service interactions Trust Service design 

References

  1. Abele, Andrea E. and Bogdan Wojciszke (2007), “Agency and Communion from the Perspective of Self versus Others,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (5), 751–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abele, Andrea E, Amy J.C. Cuddy, Charles M. Judd and Vincent, Y. Yzerbyt (2008), “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: A View from Different Perspectives,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, Eric D., Bella M. DePaulo, Matthew E. Ansfield, Jennifer J. Tickle and Emily Green (1999), “Belief About Cues to Depiction: Mindless Stereotypes or Untapped Wisdom?” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23 (1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle, Michael (1973), “The Syntaxes of Bodily Communication,” International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 71–91.Google Scholar
  5. Argyle, Michael, Veronika Satler, Hilary Nicholson, Marylin Williams and Philip Burgess (1970), “The Communication of Inferior and Superior Attitudes by Verbal and Nonverbal Signals,” British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Averill, James R. “Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.” Psychological Bulletin 80, no. 4 (1973): 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axelrod, Robert (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bakan, David (1966), The Duality of Human Existence, Chicago, Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  9. Beattie, Jane, Jonathan Baron, John C. Hershey, and Mark D. Spranca. “Psychological determinants of decision attitude.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7, no. 2 (1994): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonoma, Thomas V. and Leonard C. Felder (1977), “Nonverbal Communication in Marketing: Toward a Communicational Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Botti, Simona, and Sheena S. Iyengar. “The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction.” Journal of personality and social psychology 87, no. 3 (2004): 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botti, Simona, Kristina Orfali, and Sheena S. Iyengar. “Tragic choices: Autonomy and emotional responses to medical decisions.” Journal of Consumer Research 36, no. 3 (2009): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunner-Sperdin, Alexandra., and Dasu, Sriram (2015) “Behaviors that Influence Perception of Competence and Benevolence of a Service Provider during the Initial Service Encounter.” Working paper, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  14. Burgoon, Judee K., David B. Buller, Jerold L. Hale and Mark A. deTurck (1984), “Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviours,” Human Communication Research, 10 (3), 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cacioppo, John T., and Richard E. Petty. “The need for cognition.” Journal of personality and social psychology 42, no. 1 (1982): 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carli, Linda L., Suzanne J. LaFleur and Christopher C. Loeber (1995), “Nonverbal Behavior, Gender, and Influence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (6), 1030–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cesario, Joseph and E. Tory Higgins (2008), “Making message recipients “feel right”: How nonverbal cues can increase persuasion,” Psychological Science, 19 (5), 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chernev, Alexander. “When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice.” Journal of Consumer Research 30, no. 2 (2003): 170–183.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chitturi, Ravindra, Rajagopal Raghunathan, and Vijay Mahajan. “Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits.” Journal of Marketing 72, no. 3 (2008): 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cho, Eunice Kim, Uzma Khan, and Ravi Dhar. “Comparing apples to apples or apples to oranges: The role of mental representation in choice difficulty.” Journal of Marketing Research 50, no. 4 (2013): 505–516.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dasu, Sriram, and Richard B. Chase. The Customer Service Solution: Managing Emotions, Trust, and Control to Win Your Customer’s Business: Managing Emotions, Trust, and Control to Win Your Customer’s Business. McGraw Hill Professional, 2013Google Scholar
  22. Degner, Lesley F., Linda J. Kristjanson, David Bowman, Jeffrey A. Sloan, K. C. Carriere, John O’Neill, Barbara Bilodeau, Peter Watson, and Bryan Mueller. “Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.” JAMA 277, no. 18 (1997): 1485–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dellande, Stephanie, Mary C. Gilly and John L. Graham (2004), “Gaining Compliance and Losing Weight: The Role of the Service Provider in Health Care Services,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhar, Ravi. “Consumer preference for a no-choice option.” Journal of consumer research 24, no. 2 (1997): 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Driskell, James E., Beckett Olmstead and Eduardo Salas (1993), “Task Cues, Dominance Cues and Influence in Task Groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunbar, R. I. M., Ben Teasdale, Jackie Thompson, Felix Budelmann, Sophie Duncan, Evert van Emde Boas, and Laurie Maguire. “Emotional arousal when watching drama increases pain threshold and social bonding.” Royal Society open science 3, no. 9 (2016): 160288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edwards, Adrian, and Glyn Elwyn, eds. Shared decision-making in health care: Achieving evidence-based patient choice. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  28. Elsbach, Kimberly D., and Greg Elofson. “How the packaging of decision explanations affects perceptions of trustworthiness.” Academy of Management Journal 43, no. 1 (2000): 80–89.Google Scholar
  29. Fennis, Bob M. and Marielle Stel (2001), “The Pantomime of Persuasion: Fit between Nonverbal Communication and Influence Strategies,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 806–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiske, Susan T., Amy J. Cuddy and Peter Glick (2007), “Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: Warmth and Competence”. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedman, Howard S., Louise M. Prince, Ronald E Riggio, and Robin M. DiMatteo (1980), “Understanding and Assessing Nonverbal Expressiveness: The Affective Communication Test,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (2), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gabbott, Mark and Gillian Hogg (2001), “The Role of Non-verbal Communication in Service Encounters: A conceptual framework,” Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gambetta, Diego. “Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations.” (1988).Google Scholar
  34. Gilovich, Thomas, Victoria Husted Medvec, and Serena Chen. “Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the “Monty Hall” problem.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, no. 2 (1995): 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodwin, Cathy and Charles D. Frame (1989), “Social Distance within the Service Encounter: Does the Consumer Want to be your Friend?” Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 64–71.Google Scholar
  36. Hastie, Reid, and Robyn M. Dawes. Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage, 2010Google Scholar
  37. Imada, Andrew S. and Milton D. Hakel (1977), “Influence of Nonverbal Communication and Rater Proximity on Impressions and Decisions in Simulated Employment Interviews,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (3), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Iyengar, Sheena S., and Mark R. Lepper. “When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?.” Journal of personality and social psychology 79, no. 6 (2000): 995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Judd, Charles M., Laurie James-Hawkins, Vincent Yzerbyt and Yoshihisa Kashima (2005), “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations between Judgments of Competence and Warmth”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kramer, Roderick M. (1999), “Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions,” Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunda, Ziva (1999), Social Cognition. Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lefcourt, Herbert M. “The function of the illusions of control and freedom.” American Psychologist 28, no. 5 (1973): 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leotti, Lauren A., Sheena S. Iyengar, and Kevin N. Ochsner. “Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control.” Trends in cognitive sciences 14, no. 10 (2010): 457–463.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewicki, Roy J., and Barbara B. Bunker. “Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships.” Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research 114 (1996): 139.Google Scholar
  45. Lewicki, Roy J., Edward C. Tomlinson, and Nicole Gillespie. “Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions.” Journal of management 32, no. 6 (2006): 991–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. “An integrative model of organizational trust.” Academy of management review 20, no. 3 (1995): 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayer, Roger C. and James H. Davis (1999), “The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-experiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (1), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mellers, Barbara A. “Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences.” Psychological Bulletin 126, no. 6 (2000): 910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyerson, Debra., Karl, E. Weick and Roderick M. Kramer (1996), “Swift Trust and Temporary Groups”, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Kramer R.M., and T.R. Tyler eds. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 166–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  51. Rasmussen, Keith G. (1984), “Nonverbal Behavior, Verbal Behavior, Resumé Credentials, and Selection interview outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (4), 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. “Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups.” American Sociological Review(1987): 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenberg, Seymour, Carnot Nelson and P. S. Vivekananthan (1968), “A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roter, Debra and Judith A. Hall (2006), Doctors Talking with Patients/Patients Talking with Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits, Praeger, 2nd Edition.Google Scholar
  55. Rotter, Julian B. (1980), “Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility”, American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rousseau, Denise M., Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer. “Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.” Academy of management review 23, no. 3 (1998): 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan, H., Penelope Schofield, Jill Cockburn, Phyllis Butow, Martin Tattersall, Jane Turner, Afaf Girgis, Dilhani Bandaranyake and Deborah Bowman (2005), “How to Recognize and Manage Psychological Distress in Cancer Patients”, European Journal of Cancer Care, 14 (1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scherer, Klaus R. and James S. Oshinsky (1977), “Cue Utilization in Emotion Attribution from Auditory Stimuli,” Motivation and Emotion, 1, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwartz, Barry. The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Vol. 6. New York: HarperCollins, 2004Google Scholar
  60. Shafir, Eldar, Itamar Simonson, and Amos Tversky. “Reason-based choice.” Cognition 49, no. 1-2 (1993): 11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sirdeshmukh, Deepak, Jagdip Singh, and Barry Sabol. “Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges.” Journal of marketing 66, no. 1 (2002): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Surprenant, Carol F., and Michael R. Solomon. “Predictability and personalization in the service encounter.” The Journal of Marketing (1987): 86–96,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thagard, Paul and Ziva Kunda (1998), “Making Sense of People: Coherence Mechanism”, in Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior, Read, S.J. and L.C. Miller eds, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, Psychology Press, 3–26.Google Scholar
  64. Taute, Harry A., Robert S. Heiser and David N. McArthur (2011), “The Effect of Nonverbal Signals on Student Role- play Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Education, 33 (1), 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagnild, Gail M., and Heather M. Young. “Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale.” Journal of nursing measurement (1993).Google Scholar
  66. Wiggins Jerry S. (1991), “Agency and Communion as Conceptual Coordinates for the Understanding and Measurement of Interpersonal Behavior”, in: Thinking clearly about psychology - Personality and psychopathology, Grove, W.M. and D. Cicchetti eds, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 89–113.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, Pamela and Regis J. McNamara (1982), “How Perception of a Simulated Physician-patient Interaction Influence Intended Satisfaction and Compliance,” Social Science Medicine, 16, 1699–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu, Ying, June H. Larrabee and Heidi P. Putman (2006), “Caring Behaviors Inventory – A reduction of the 42- Item instrument,” Nursing Research, 55 (1), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zeliadt, Steven B., Scott D. Ramsey, David F. Penson, Ingrid J. Hall, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Leonard Stroud, and Judith W. Lee. “Why do men choose one treatment over another? A review of patient decision making for localized prostate cancer.” Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 106, no. 9 (2006): 1865–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of Applied SciencesKufsteinAustria

Personalised recommendations