Advertisement

Toward the Service Science of Education

  • Oleg V. PavlovEmail author
  • Frank Hoy
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

This article applies the service science framework to higher education. To understand the reasons behind the success and failure of academic programs, we build on the previous literature that suggests that education is a service delivered by universities, which are viewed as complex systems. We contribute to the service science theory by introducing a methodological tool called the Service Science Canvas, which incorporates elements and principles common to all service systems. The Service Science Canvas is a convenient tool for identifying components of academic programs. This article reviews educational programs in entrepreneurship, and, as a case study, it examines an entrepreneurship program at a technological university in the United States.

Keywords

Higher education Academic program management Service systems Service science Service Science Canvas 

References

  1. Barile, S., Franco, G. Nota, G. and Saviano, M. (2012). Structure and dynamics of a T-shaped knowledge: from individuals to cooperating communities of practice. Service Science, 4(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barile, S. & Polese, F. (2010). Smart service systems and viable service systems. Service Science, 2(1/2), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliemel, M. J., McCarthy, I.P. & Maine, E.M.A. (2014). An integrated approach to studying multiplexity in entrepreneurial networks. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(4), 367–402.Google Scholar
  4. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Lelescu, A. & Spohrer, J. (2008). Three factors to sustainable service system excellence: a case study of service systems. IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 7–11 July 2008. Honolulu, HI, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, C. M. & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Fetters, M. L., Greene, P.G., Rice, M.P., & Butler, J.S. (Eds.) (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Finkle, T. A., Menzies, T.V., Kuratko, D.F., & Goldsby, M.G. (2013). An examination of the financial challenges of entrepreneurship centers throughout the world. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glushko, R. J. (2013). Describing service systems. Journal of Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing, 23(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from emerging world leaders. MIT Skoltech Initiative Report.Google Scholar
  11. Gulbranson, C. A., & Audretsch, D. (2008). Proof of concept centers: Accelerating the commercialization of university innovation. Kauffman Foundation. Available from: http://sites.kauffman.org/pdf/poc_centers_01242008.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2013.
  12. Holly, K. Z. (2012). Universities in innovation networks: The role and future promise of university research in U.S. science and economic policymaking. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/general/reports/2012/01/19/10984/universities-in-innovation-networks/ . Accessed 9 Dec 2017
  13. Kaplin, W. A., & Lee, B.A. (2007). The law of higher education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J.A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, J. A., J. Roberts, R. Strom and A. Freilich (2014). Perspectives on the development of cross campus entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 13–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kyrö, P. and C. Carrier (2005). Entrepreneurial Learning in Universities: Bridges across Borders. In The Dynamics of Learning Entrepreneurship in a Cross-Cultural University Context. P. Kyrö and C. Carrier. Tampere, Finland, University of Tampere: 14–43.Google Scholar
  17. Lella, G., Fischetto, V., Cesarotti, A. Spohrer, VJ C., Ren, G., & Leung, Y.T. (2012). Universities as complex service systems: External and Internal perspectives. IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI). 08-10 Jul 2012. Suzhou, China.Google Scholar
  18. Lucas, C. J. (2006). American higher education: a history. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyons, K., & Tracy, S. (2013). Characterizing organizations as service systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(1), 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maglio, P. P., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N. & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems & e-Business Management, 7, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massy, W. (2016). Reengineering the university: how to be mission centered, market smart, and margin conscious. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McMurtrie, B. (2015, April 20). Sponsors of campus entrepreneurship. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Sponsors-of-Campus/229449/. Accessed 9 Dec 2017.
  23. Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., & Cornwall, J.R. (2013). Entrepreneurship programs and the modern university. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., & Pryor, C.G. (2014). Building blocks for the development of university-wide entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  25. Mulcahy, D. (2017). The Gig Economy. New York, American Management Association.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, W., Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J., & Fodell, D. (2011). A systems-disciplines framework for visualizing the scope of service sciences. Frontiers in Service Conference. 1 Jul, 2011, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  27. Neck, H. M., Greene, P.G. & Brush C.G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship: a practice-based approach. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson, P., & Lumsdaine, E. (2008). Creating an entrepreneurial culture in an engineering university. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference and Exposition.Google Scholar
  29. OIPI (2016). Office of intellectual property and innovation annual report. Worcester, MA, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. https://www.wpi.edu/sites/default/files/docs/Offices/Intellectual-Property/IPI%202016%20annual%20report.pdf. Accessed: 6 Jan 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Pavlov, O., Doyle, J., Saeed, K., Lyneis, J. & Radzicki, M. (2014). The Design of Educational Programs in System Dynamics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Systems, 2(1), 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pavlov, O. V. & Saeed, K. (2004). A Resource-Based Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Technology. System Dynamics Review, 20(3), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rice, M. P., Fetters, M.L., & Greene, P.G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: A global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5/6), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberts, J., Hoy, F., Katz, J.A. & Neck, H. (2014). The challenges of infusing entrepreneurship within non-business disciplines and measuring outcomes. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shabad, L. (2016, June 6). University entrepreneurship in Russia: quest for strategic change in the Russian university system. Global University Venturing. http://www.globaluniversityventuring.com/article.php/5312/university-entrepreneurship-in-russia-quest-for-strategic-change-in-the-russian-university-system. Accessed 9 Dec 2017.
  36. Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2008). Service science and service-dominant logic. Otago Forum 2: Academic Papers, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  37. Spohrer, J., Giuiusa, A., Demirkan, H. & Ing, D. (2013). Service science: reframing progress with universities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spohrer, J., & Kwan, S.K. (2009). Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): an emerging discipline – outline and references. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 1(3), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spohrer, J., Piciocchi, P. & Bassano, C. (2012). Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. INFORMS Service Science, 4(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torrance, W., Rauch, J., Aulet, W., Blum, L., D’Ambrosio, T. & De los Santos, K. (2013). Entrepreneurship Education Comes of Age on Campus: The Challenges and Rewards of Bringing Entrepreneurship to Higher Education, Kauffman Foundation: 1–28.Google Scholar
  42. Tryggvason, G., Schaufeld, J.J., & Banks, M. (2010). Teaching engineering innovation and entrepreneurship early in the curriculum. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 42–50.Google Scholar
  43. Vesper, K. H. (1983). Entrepreneurship and national policy. Chicago, IL: Heller Institute for Small Business.Google Scholar
  44. Welsh, D.H.B. (2014). Creative cross-disciplinary entrepreneurship: a practical guide for a campus-wide program. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winkler, C. (2014). Toward a dynamic understanding of entrepreneurship education research across the campus – social cognition and action research. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 69–93.Google Scholar
  46. Zaini, R., Pavlov, O., Saeed, K., Radzicki, M., Hoffman, A. & Tichenor, K. (2016). Let's talk change in a university: a simple model for addressing a complex agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(3), 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations