Advertisement

Digital Workers in Service Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Paolo PiciocchiEmail author
  • Clara Bassano
  • Maria Cristina Pietronudo
  • James C. Spohrer
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

Early forms of AI systems (digital workers), from cognitive assistants to driverless vehicles, are beginning to appear in service systems, creating challenges and opportunities. Meanwhile, people (smarter workers) with an affinity for using advanced technologies are getting things done in new ways. Working scenarios today are guided by high resonant collaboration and wide spread knowledge communication among professionals. To analyze this scenario, we combine both a traditional analytical approach (focus on the parts) and a holistic approach (focus on the whole), privileging a transdisciplinary perspective based on the three frameworks: SSME+DAPP, VSA and IAD. This chapter aims to analyze the challenges and opportunities of digital workers coming to service systems, and provide recommendations for individuals, managers, policymaker, and academics. To mitigate the challenges and seize the opportunities, a wide range of professionals are transforming themselves into T-shaped adaptive innovators in Smart Working environments.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Digital workers Smart working T-shaped professionals 

References

  1. Adecco (2015). Discover the future of social recruiting and smartworking. Work Trends Study. Retrieved from http://englishbulletin.adapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Adecco-Work-Trends-Study-2015.pdf
  2. Arthur WB (2017) Where is technology taking the future? McKinsey Quarterly. October 1, 2017 URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/where-is-technology-taking-the-economy
  3. Ahuja, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., & George, J. F. (2007). ICT Road Warriors: Balancing Work-Family Conflict, Job Autonomy, and Work Overload to Mitigate Turnover Intentions. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustine, N. R. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakar, M. S., Ramli, A. B., Ibrahim, N. A., & Muhammad, I. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy dimensions and higher education institution performance. IJMS, 24(1), 119–137.Google Scholar
  6. Barile, S. (2009a). Viable System Management. Giappichelli, Torino.Google Scholar
  7. Barile, S. (2009b) The dynamic of information varieties in the processes of decision making, contributo in the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Generation, Communication and Management: KGCM 2009 in the context of The 13th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: WMSCI 2009 July 10th - 13th, 2009 – Orlando, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Barile, S., Calabrese, M., Polese, F., Saviano, M. (2013a), The Government of Complex Systems Between Current Competences and Potential Capabilities, in Barile, S., Eletti, V., Matteuzzi, M. (Ed.), (n.d.) Decisions and choices in complex contexts, Cedam-Kluwer, Lavis, pp. 261–294.Google Scholar
  9. Barile, S., Carrubbo, L., Iandolo, F., Caputo, F. (2013b). From ‘EGO’ to ‘ECO’ in B2B relationships. Journal of Business Market Management, 6(4), 228–253.Google Scholar
  10. Barile, S., Franco, G., Nota, G., Saviano, M. (2012a). Structure and dynamics of a “T-Shaped” knowledge: From individuals to cooperating communities of practice. Service Science, 4(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barile, S., Polese, F. (2010). Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1–2), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barile, S., Polese, F., Calabrese, M., Iandolo, F., & Carrubbo, L. (2013c). A theoretical framework for measuring value creation based on Viable Systems Approach (VSA) in Barile, S. (Ed.), Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management, Viable Systems Approach, ARACNE Editrice, Roma, 2013, ISBN 978-88-548-6082-7Google Scholar
  13. Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2010). A new perspective of systems complexity in service science., in Impresa, Ambiente, Management, 3,3, pp.369–406Google Scholar
  14. Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2011). Foundation of systems thinking: the structure-system paradigmGoogle Scholar
  15. Barile, S., & Saviano, M. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and T-shaped Knowledge: A Viable Systems Approach.Google Scholar
  16. Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., & Di Nauta, P. (2012b). The Firm-Territory Relationship between Local Efficiency, Context Effectiveness and Environmental Sustainability.Google Scholar
  17. Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the firm. The managerial cybernetics of organization. The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bhatt, G. D. (2002). Management strategies for individual knowledge and organizational knowledge. Journal of knowledge management, 6(1), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bollinger, A. S., & Smith, R. D. (2001). Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boorsma, B., & Mitchell S. (2011) Work-life innovation, smart work- paradigm shift transforming: how, where, and when work gets done, San Jose, CA, Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG), retrieved April 30, 2013Google Scholar
  21. Brewer, A. M. (2000). Work design for flexible work scheduling: Barriers and gender implications. Gender, Work & Organization, 7(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. CIPD (2008) Smart Working: The Impact of Work Organisation and Job Design. Wimbledon: Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).Google Scholar
  23. CIPD (2014a) Labour market outlook: summer 2014 [online]. Quarterly survey report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Available at: http://www.cipd. co.uk/hr-resources/surveyreports/labour-market-outlooksummer-2014.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2014]. Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).
  24. CIPD. (2014b) Landing transformational change. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Available at: http://www.cipd. co.uk/hr-resources/research/transformational-change.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2014]. Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).
  25. CIPD (2014c) Hr: getting Smart about agile working, London, Charter Institute of Personell and Development (CIPD).Google Scholar
  26. Ciolfi, L., Bartolucci, I., & Murphy, D. (2005, September). Meaningful interactions for meaningful places: investigating the relationships between nomadic work, tangible artefacts and the physical environment. In Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics (pp. 115–121). University of Athens.Google Scholar
  27. Clapperton, G. and Vanhoutte, P. (2014) The Smarter Working Manifesto. When, where and how do you work best? 1st ed. Oxford: Sunmakers.Google Scholar
  28. Cook, D. J., Augusto, J. C., Jakkula, V. R. (2009). Ambient Intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(4), 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crawford, Sue E.S., and Elinor Ostrom. (2005). A Grammar of Institutions. In Understanding Institutional Diversity, Elinor Ostrom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 137–74. Originally published in American Political Science Review 89 (3) (1995): 582–600.Google Scholar
  30. Deloitte (2012). The digital workplace: Think, share, do: Transform your employee experience. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mx/Documents/humancapital/The_digital_workplace.pdf
  31. Demirkan, H., Bess, C., Spohrer, J., Rayes, A., Allen, D., Kamp; Moghaddam, Y. (2015). Innovations with Smart Service Systems: Analytics, Big Data, Cognitive Assistance, and the Internet of Everything. CAIS, 37, 35.Google Scholar
  32. Donofrio, N., Sanchez, C., & Spohrer, J. (2009). Collaborative Innovation and Service Systems: Implications for Institutions and Disciplines, in Grasso D., (Ed) Holistic Engineering.Google Scholar
  33. Donofrio, N., Spohrer, J., Zadeh, H. S., Demirkan, H (2018). Driven medical education and practice: A case for T-shaped professionals. In Eds. Moghaddam, Demirkan, Spohrer, T-Shaped Professional: Adaptive Innovators. Business Expert Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ducatel, K., Bogdanowicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., Burgelman, J. C. (2001). Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010 (pp. 3–8). Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  35. Durward, D., Blohm, I., &Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Crowd work. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(4), 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2015). The University-Driven LISs. In The Creation of Local Innovation Systems in Emerging Countries (pp. 91–114). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10440- 9.
  37. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation.Google Scholar
  38. Gershuny, J. (2003). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Golinelli GM (2010) Viable Systems Approach (VSA): Governing Business Dynamics (CEDAM, Padova, Italy).Google Scholar
  40. Golinelli G.M. and Bassano C. (2012). Human resources for governing business dynamics. The Viable Systems Approach, The 1st International Conference on the Human Side of Service Engineering, San Francisco, Hotel Hilton, July 23–25Google Scholar
  41. Gummesson E (2010) Personal communication, March 17.Google Scholar
  42. Hawley AH (1986) Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  43. Iacono G. (2013), Smart Knowledge Working, Milan, DigitpubGoogle Scholar
  44. IfM and IBM (2008). Succeeding Through Service Innovation: A Service Perspective for Education. Research, Business, and Government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge (2008).Google Scholar
  45. ISSIP/NSF Workshop (2017). Industry-Academe research partnerships to enable the human-technology frontier for next generation smarter service system. J. Spohrer (2017) Engineering Robots to live In and learn with: towards smarter/wiser Service Systems, San Jose, CA, March 29, 2017Google Scholar
  46. Iwano, K., &Motegi, T. (2015). Wisdom computing: toward creative collaboration between humans and machines. J. Inf. Pro. Manag, 58, 515–524.Google Scholar
  47. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International journal of information management, 19(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kramer, R. J. (2005). Developing global leaders: Enhancing competencies and accelerating the expatriate experience. Conference Board.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, J. (2013). Cross-disciplinary knowledge: desperate call from business enterprises in coming smart working era. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(sup1), S285-S303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levy, F., Murnane, R. J. (2004). The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Macaulay, L., Moxham, C., Jones, B., & Miles, I. (2010). Innovation and Skills‖. Handbook of Service Science, Springer, 717–736.Google Scholar
  52. Mavrommati, I., and Darzentas, J. (2006). An overview of AmI from a User Centered Designperspective. IET Proceedings of IE06, Athens.Google Scholar
  53. McEwan, A. M. (2016). Smart working: Creating the next wave. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mrass, V., Li, M. M., & Peters, C. (2017). Towards a Taxonomy of Digital Work.Google Scholar
  55. Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn. MIT press.Google Scholar
  56. Nauert, R., (2011). Worker Autonomy Can Lead to Greater Productivity, Satisfaction. [Online] Available at: http://psychcentral.com
  57. Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’, Organization Science, Vol. 5, pp. 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ostrom, E. (1997). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  60. Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 15181–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ostrom E (2009). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic sytems. Prize Lecture, December 8, Aula Magna, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  62. Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Patrício, L., Fisk, R. P., Falcão e Cunha, J., & Constantine, L. (2011). Multilevel service design: from customer value constellation to service experience blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piciocchi, P., Bassano, C., Paduano, E., & Galvin, M. (2011). The Viable Systems Approach (VSA) for Re-interpreting Network Business Dynamics. Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, 304–320.Google Scholar
  65. Piciocchi P, Saviano M, Bassano C (2009) Network creativity to reduce strategic ambiguity inturbulent environments: A viable systems approach (vSa). 11th Internat. Conf. Global Bus. Econom. Development, Proc. Internat. Conf., Vol. 3 (University of Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic).Google Scholar
  66. Piciocchi, P., Spohrer, J.C., Martuscelli, L., Pietronudo, M.C., Scocozza, M., & Bassano C. (2017). T-Shape Professionals Co-working in Smart Contexts: VEGA(ST) – Venice Gateway for Science and Technology. In Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on The Human Side of Service Engineering, (Vol. 601, pp 178–190), Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  67. Politecnico di Milano (2012) Smart Working; rethinking work, releasing energy. Report Smart WorkingObservatory, Milan; Politecnico di Milano.Google Scholar
  68. Reif, G., Kirda, E., Gall, H., Picco, G. P., Cugola, G., & Fenkam, P. (2001). A web-based peer-to-peer architecture for collaborative nomadic working. In Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2001. WET ICE 2001. Proceedings. Tenth IEEE International Workshops on (pp. 334–339). IEEE.Google Scholar
  69. Rouse WB, Spohrer JC (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. 7:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sarti, D., & Torre, T. (2017). Is Smart Working a Win-Win Solution? First Evidence from the Field. Well-being at and through Work, 9, 231.Google Scholar
  71. Saviano, M., Caputo, F., Formisano, V., Walletzký, L. (2016). “From theory to practice in systems studies: a focus on Smart Cities”. In 4rd International Symposium Advances in Business Management. “Towards Systemic Approach”, Mikolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lituania, 24–26 August.Google Scholar
  72. Saxena M. (2016). Transforming Human Resource practices through technology. Damascius International Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, September.Google Scholar
  73. Schiller, J. H. (2003). Mobile communications. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  74. Siddiki, Saba, Christopher M. Weible, Xavier Basurto, and John Calanni. (2011). Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spohrer, J.(2016). Innovation for jobs with cognitive assistants: A service science perspective. InNordfors, D., Cerf, V., Senges, M. (eds.) Disrupting Unemployment: Reflections on Sustainable Middle Class Economic Recovery. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Spohrer, J., & Banavar, G. (2015). Cognition as a service: an industry perspective. AI Magazine, 36(4), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spohrer, J., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., & Siddike, M. A. K. (2017). What Makes a System Smart? Wise?. In Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering (pp. 23–34). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  78. Spohrer, J., Golinelli, G. M., Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2010). An integrated SS-VSA analysis of changing job roles. Service Science, 2(1–2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spohrer, J., & Kwan, S. K. (2009). Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): an emerging discipline--outline and references. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 1(3), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2010a). Service science: Toward a smarter planet. Introduction to service engineering, 3–30.Google Scholar
  81. Spohrer J, Maglio PP (2010b) Toward a science of service systems: Value and symbols. Maglio PP, Kieliszewski CA, Spohrer JC, eds. Handbook of Service Science (Springer, New York), 157–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spohrer, J., Piciocchi, P., & Bassano, C. (2012). Three frameworks for service research: exploring multilevel governance in nested, networked systems. Service Science, 4(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Piciocchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clara Bassano
    • 2
  • Maria Cristina Pietronudo
    • 2
  • James C. Spohrer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political, Social and Communication StudiesUniversity of SalernoSalernoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Management Studies and Quantitative MethodsParthenope UniversityNaplesItaly
  3. 3.IBM Cognitive Opentech, AlmadenSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations