Abstract
The political sociology of regionalisms offers insightful perspectives for comparisons. In this concluding chapter, we synthetize the general proposal, underline the necessity of academic collaborations to consolidate a research agenda, and identify some limits that constitute future challenges for empirical and theoretical work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 647–659.
Bach, D. (2016). Regionalism in Africa: Genealogies, Institutions and Trans-State Networks. London: Routledge.
Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mattheis, F. (2014). New Regionalism in the South : Mercosur and SADC in a Comparative and Interregional Perspective. Leipzig: Leipzig University Press.
Pouliot, V. (2017). L’ordre hiérarchique international. Les luttes de rang dans la diplomatie multilatérale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parthenay, K. (2019). Conclusion. In: A Political Sociology of Regionalisms. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98434-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98434-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98433-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98434-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)