Skip to main content

The Utility of Laboratory Data: What to Consider and How to Interpret in Common Abdominal Diseases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation of abdominal pain in the emergency department demands the consideration of a multitude of pathologies. Laboratory data is commonly used both in the diagnosis of abdominal pain etiology and in determining an appropriate disposition for the patient. An understanding of the applications and limitations of various laboratory studies in this context is important for a practicing emergency provider. This review provides the practicing clinician with advice on when to utilize these tests and in how they should be interpreted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Medford-Davis L, Park E, Shlamovitz G, Suliburk J, Meyer A, Singh H. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2015;33(4):253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trowbridge R, Rutkowski N, Shojania K. Does this patient have acute cholecystitis? JAMA. 2003;289(1):80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Videhult P, Sandblom G, Rudberg C, Rasmussen I. Are liver function tests, pancreatitis and cholecystitis predictors of common bile duct stones? Results of a prospective, population-based, cohort study of 1171 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. HPB. 2011;13(8):519–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourikian S, Anand R, Aboutanos M, Wolfe L, Ferrada P. Risk factors for acute gangrenous cholecystitis in emergency general surgery patients. Am J Surg. 2015;210(4):730–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ismail O, Bhayana V. Lipase or amylase for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis? Clin Biochem. 2017;50(18):1275–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang L, Liu J, Xing Y, Du L, Chen J, Liu X, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson, MCTSI, and APACHE II in predicting severity and prognoses of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Benabbas R, Hanna M, Shah J, Sinert R. Diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric acute appendicitis in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(5):523–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwan K, Nager A. Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis: usefulness of laboratory markers. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(9):1009–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandeville K, Pottker T, Bulloch B, Liu J. Using appendicitis scores in the pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(9):972–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachur RG, Callahan MJ, Monuteaux MC, Rangel SJ. Integration of ultrasound findings and a clinical score in the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monsalve S, Ellwanger A, Montedonico S. White blood cell count and C-reactive protein together remain useful for diagnosis and staging of acute appendicitis in children. South African Med J. 2017;107(9):773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, Concepcion M, Hernanadez-Gea V, Aracil C, et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang Y, Shen J, Zhang F, Zhou X, Tang Z, You T. Comparison of four scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency room. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;356:i6432.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suarez-de-la-Rica A, Maseda E, Anillo V, Tamayo E, García-Bernedo C, Ramasco F, et al. Biomarkers (procalcitonin, C reactive protein, and lactate) as predictors of mortality in surgical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection. Surg Infect. 2015;16(3):346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel D. Luber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Serack, B.J., Luber, S.D. (2019). The Utility of Laboratory Data: What to Consider and How to Interpret in Common Abdominal Diseases. In: Graham, A., Carlberg, D.J. (eds) Gastrointestinal Emergencies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98343-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98343-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98343-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics