Abstract
Clinicians generate and record information to conduct care. This information needs to accurately represent the clinical status of patients. Such representation relies on the use of electronic standards to capture, store, and share information. These standards, their construction, implementation, use, and maintenance are then highly relevant as modern clinical practice evolves. This chapter introduces the reader to many of the factors influencing knowledge management and representation. Additionally, the reader will also gain a better understanding of the technical aspects that can support or impede clinical integration.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ai J, Smith B, Wong DT. Saliva ontology: an ontology-based framework for a Salivaomics knowledge base. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:302.
American Dental Association. Current dental terminology. Chicago, IL: American Dental Association; 1991.
American Dental Association. ADA1000-2010D – ANSI/ADA standard clinical data architecture for the structure & content of an electronic health record. 2003. https://ebusinessadaorg/productcatalog/491/Informatics/ANSIADA-Standard-No-1000-for-Standard-Clinical-Data-Architec/ADA1000-2010D. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Baader F, Horrocks I, Sattler U. Description logics. In: Handbook on ontologies. Berlin: Springer; 2004. p. 3–28.
Bader JD, Shugars DA. What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions? Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(1):97–103.
Bejan A, Lorente S. The constructal law of design and evolution in nature. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365(1545):1335–47.
Bertaud-Gounot V, Richard F, Le Moing C, Duvauferrier R. Ontology of dental emergencies for diagnostic classification. Cape Town: Medinfo; 2010.
Bertaud-Gounot V, Duvauferrier R, Burgun A. Ontology and medical diagnosis. Inform Health Soc Care. 2012;37(2):51–61.
California Dental Association. Diagnostic code changes approaching. Sacramento, CA: California Dental Association; 2015. https://wwwcdaorg/news-events/diagnostic-code-changes-approaching. Accessed 10 Jun 2018
Campbell KE, Oliver DE, Spackman KA, Shortliffe EH. Representing thoughts, words, and things in the UMLS. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(5):421–31.
Canadian Dental Association. Uniform system of codes and list of services. Ottawa, ON: CDA; 2001.
Falkman G, Gustafsson M, Jontell M, Torgersson O. SOMWeb: a semantic web-based system for supporting collaboration of distributed medical communities of practice. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e25.
Gangemi A, Guarino N, Masolo C, Oltramari A, Schneider L. Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez A, Benjamins VR, editors. Knowledge engineering and knowledge management. Ontologies and the semantic web, 13th international conference. EKAW 2002. Siguenza: Springer; 2002. p. 166–81.
Gasevic D, Djuric D, Devedzic V. Model driven architecture and ontology development. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
Grenon P, Smith B, Goldberg L. Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. In: Pisanelli DM, editor. Ontologies in medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 20–38.
Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis. 1993;5(2):199–220.
Guarino N. Formal ontology in information systems. In: Guarino N, editor. Proceedings of the first international conference (FOIS’98). Trento: IOS Press; 1998. p. 3–15.
Hammond WE, Cimino JJ. Standards in biomedical informatics. In: Shorliffe EH, Cimino JJ, editors. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in healthcare and biomedicine. New York, NY: Springer; 2006.
Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(Suppl):20S–4.
Jernigan DB, Davies J, Sim A. Data standards in public health informatics. In: O’Carroll PW, Yasnoff WA, Ward ME, Ripp LH, Martin EL, editors. Public health informatics and information systems. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. p. 213–38.
Jurkovich M. Dentistry and diagnostic coding. DrBicuspidcom. 2017. https://wwwdrbicuspidcom/indexaspx?sec=sup&sub=pmt&pag=dis&ItemID=321486. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Leake JL. Diagnostic codes in dentistry–definition, utility and developments to date. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002;68(7):403–6.
Lepsky S, Jurkovich M, Jönzzon K. ICD-10-CM for the dental industry. Workgroup for electronic data interchange. 2015. https://wwwwediorg/forms/uploadFiles/6D70900000026tocWEDI_ICD_10_CM_Module_II__11122015__FINALpdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Long JJ, Goldberg L. Diagnostic criteria of Sjögren’s syndrome: a study in knowledge transfer. Orlando, FL: ADEA/AADR/CADR Meeting & Exhibition; 2006. p. 1461.
Manchir M. Newly approved standard enables electronic capture of patient diagnoses. ADA News. 7 Dec 2016. https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2016-archive/december/newly-approved-standard-enables-electronic-capture-of-patient-diagnoses. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Musen M. Generation of model-based knowledge-acquisition tools for clinical-trial advice systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; 1988.
Newell A. The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence. 1982;18(1):87–127.
Noy N, Tudorache T, Nyulas C, Musen M. The ontology life cycle: integrated tools for editing, publishing, peer review, and evolution of ontologies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010;2010:552–6.
Ogden DK, Richards IA. The meaning of meaning: a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace; 1923. 1930
Powell MA. Money in Mesopotamia. J Econ Soc Hist Orient. 1996;39(3):224–42.
Rubin DL, Shah NH, Noy NF. Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective. Brief Bioinform. 2008;9(1):75–90.
Sandholm T. The philosophy of the grid: ontology theory – from Aristotle to self-managed IT resources. Report no.: technical report TRITA-NA-0532. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology; 2005.
Smith B. The basic tools of formal ontology. In: Guarino N, editor. Formal ontology in information systems. Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, DC: IOS Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications); 1998. p. 19–28.
Smith B, Brochhausen M. Establishing and harmonizing ontologies in an interdisciplinary health care and clinical research environment. Health Technol Inform. 2008;134:219–34.
SNODDS. SNODDS dental diagnostic system. 2016. http://dentaldiagnosticterminology.org/. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
SNOMED International. SNOMED CT General Dentistry Diagnostic refset package Release Notes – Jan 2018. https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/RMT/SNOMED+CT+General+Dentistry+Diagnostic+refset+package+Release+Notes+-+January+2018. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Soderlund K. ADA assists members in transition to ICD-10. ADA News Aug 11 2015. https://wwwadaorg/en/publications/ada-news/2015-archive/august/ada-assists-members-in-transition-to-icd-10. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.
Staad S, Studer R. Handbook on Ontologies, Springer; 2nd ed. Berlin: Heidelberg; 2009.
Starr P. INTRODUCTION, The Social Origins of Professional Sovereignty. In: Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books; 2017. p. 3–29.
Torres-Urquidy MH, Schleyer T. Formal conceptualization of dental diagnoses: status report. In: Okada M, Smith B, editors. Proceedings of the second interdisciplinary ontology meeting. Feb–Mar: Tokyo; 2009. p. 17–23.
Torres-Urquidy MH. Characterization of the Cognitive Structures Used by Dentists. Pending Dissertation: University of Pittsburgh; 2012.
van der Lei J, Musen MA. The separation of reviewing knowledge form medical knowledge. Methods Inf Med. 1995;34(1–2):131–9.
Wächter T, Schroeder M. Semi-automated ontology generation within OBO-edit. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):i88–96.
World Health Organization. Application of the international classification of diseases to dentistry and stomatology ICD-DA, vol. 3. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). OWL web ontology language overview. 2011. http://wwww3org/TR/owl-features/. Accessed 30 May 2011.
Disclaimer
The views presented in this chapter are solely of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Government, Department of Health and Human Services and/or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torres-Urquidy, M.H., Powell, V., Din, F., Jurkovich, M., Bertaud-Gounot, V. (2019). Knowledge Standardization, Management, and Integration. In: Acharya, A., Powell, V., Torres-Urquidy, M., Posteraro, R., Thyvalikakath, T. (eds) Integration of Medical and Dental Care and Patient Data. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98298-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98298-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98296-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98298-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)