Strengthening Personal Concern and the Willingness to Act Through Climate Change Communication

Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


The climate change awareness of teenagers, as the leading generation for future development affects how societies will be able to cope with climate change. Especially teenagers’ concerns about climate change and their willingness to act in a climate-friendly manner are factors climate change communication has to address. This study investigates why teenagers do not feel concerned about climate change or are not willing to act in a climate-friendly manner in order to identify strategies regarding how to strengthen these aspects in target group-oriented climate change communication formats. Using a mixed-method approach, a quantitative analysis of questionnaires answered by 760 13–16-year old teenagers was validated by a qualitative analysis of interviews with selected respondents. The findings suggest that those teenagers who are not concerned about climate change believe that climate change will happen only in the future. Furthermore, they do not recognize the interconnections or feedbacks regarding climate change between the components of the global system. The group of teenagers who are not willing to act question their own impact and ability to influence the effects of climate change. The findings are discussed, in order to identify implications for climate change communication tailored to the needs of the target group.


Climate change communication Concern about climate change Mixed-method approach Young people Willingness to act 



We would like to thank the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund (KR14AC7K11819), which finances k.i.d.Z.21-Austria, project number: B464783. Special thanks go to everyone who has contributed to the success of the project, especially to the teenagers involved in this study.


  1. Anderson A (2012) Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. J Educ Sustain Dev 6(2):191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27(1):14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bofferding L, Kloser M (2014) Middle and high school students’ conceptions of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Environ Educ Res 21(2):275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyes E, Stanisstreet M (2012) Environmental education for behaviour change: which actions should be targeted? Int J Sci Educ 34(10):1591–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryman A (2012) Social research methods, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckler C, Creech H (2014) Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development. Final report; 2014: UN Decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014) Final reportGoogle Scholar
  7. Corner A, Roberts O, Chiari S, Völler S, Mayrhuber E, Mandl S, Monson K (2015) How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Clim Change 6:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fielding KS, Head BW (2012) Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: the role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environ Educ Res 18(2):171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frick J, Kaiser FG, Wilson M (2004) Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personal Individ Differ 37(8):1597–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Good PI (2013) Introduction to statistics through resampling methods and R, 2nd ed. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hines J, Hungerford H, Tomera A (1986/1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta analysis. J Environ Educ 18(2): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howell RA, Allen S (2016) Significant life experiences, motivations and values of climate change educators. Environ Educ Res 48:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: summary for policymakersGoogle Scholar
  14. Jugert P, Greenaway KH, Barth M, Büchner R, Eisentraut S, Fritsche I (2016) Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. J Environ Psychol 48:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kagawa F, Selby D (2013) Ready for the storm: education for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and mitigation. J Educ Sustain Dev 6(2):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2003) Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Appl Psychol Int Rev 52(4):598–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karpudewan M, Roth WM, Mohd Nor Syahrir Bin A (2014) Enhancing primary school students’ knowledge about global warming and environmental attitude using climate change activities. Int J Sci Educ 37(1):31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuthe A, Keller L, Körfgen A, Stötter J, Oberrauch A, Höferl KM (submitted) How many young generations are there?—The variety of teenagers’ climate change awareness. J Environ EducGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayring P (2015) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 12th ed. Beltz Pädagogik, Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  22. Metag J, Füchslin T, Schafer, MS (2015) Global warming’s five Germanys: a typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  23. Mochizuki Y, Bryan A (2015) Climate change education in the context of education for sustainable development: rationale and principles. J Educ Sustain Dev 9(1):4–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Sci Commun 30(3):305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ojala M (2012) Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environ Educ Res 18(5):625–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ojala M (2015) Climate change scepticism among adolescents. J Youth Stud 18(9):1135–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30(3):355–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pidgeon N (2012) Climate change risk perception and communication: addressing a critical moment? Risk Anal 32(6):951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rapley T (2010) Interviews. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London, pp 15–33Google Scholar
  30. Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackmann H, Lee YT, Mokhele K, Ostrom E, Raivio K, Rockstrom J, Schellnhuber HJ, Whyte A (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330(6006):916–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roeser S (2012) Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Anal 32(6):1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schuler S (2011) Alltagstheorien zu den Ursachen und Folgen des globalen Klimawandels: Erhebung und Analyse von Schülervorstellungen aus geographiedidaktischer Perspektive. Bochumer Geographische Arbeiten, vol 78. Europäischer, Universitätsverlag, BochumGoogle Scholar
  33. Schweizer S, Davis S, Thompson JL (2013) Changing the conversation about climate change: a theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environ Commun J Nat Cult 7(1):42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, Lab George (2008) Public perception of climate change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinatra GM, Kardash CM, Taasoobshirazi G, Lombardi D (2012) Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instr Sci 40(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith N, Leiserowitz A (2014) The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal 34(5):937–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spicer N (2011) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In: Seale C (ed), Researching society and culture 3rd ed. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 479–493Google Scholar
  39. WBGU (2011) Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine große Transformation. WBGU, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Wibeck V (2013) Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change-some lessons from recent literature. Environ Educ Res 20(3):387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations