Advertisement

Stirring up Trouble: Museums as Provocateurs and Change Agents in Polycentric Alliances for Climate Change Action

  • Fiona R. CameronEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss key findings from the Australian Research Council funded international project, “Hot Science Global Citizens: The Agency of the Museum Sector in Climate Change Interventions” (2008–2012). The project looked to the museum sector—natural history, science museums and science centres—to play a role as resource, catalyst and change agent in climate change debates and decision-making locally and globally. The discussion focuses on a section of the research findings relating to the current and potential roles and agencies of natural history, science museums and science centres in polycentric climate change governing assemblages within Australian and US contexts. Through the analysis, eight strategic positions and role changes emerge for the different forms of the museum with a greater emphasis on collective action, networking and building more critical information on climate change as a complex issue and governing subject alongside activism in community and political contexts. In addition, re-working the relations between nature and culture across museum practice through a series of ecologizing experimentations was identified as a key role change in advancing sustainable practices in the long term.

Keywords

Climate change Museums Agencies Polycentric governance Posthumanities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter is an output from the Australian Research Council funded Linkage project, Hot science, global citizens: the agency of the museum sector in climate change interventions, led by the author. Parts of this chapter have been published in Cameron, FR. 2012, Climate change, agencies, and the museum for a complex world. October, vo Museum Management and Curatorship, 27 (4): 317–339. Special thanks to Dr. Ben Dibley and Dr. Ann Deslandes for their contributions to focus group data analysis and Carolyn Meehan for quantitative gap role analysis.

References

  1. Bennett J (2010) Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Braidotti R (2013) The posthuman. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron FR (2010) Liquid governmentalities, liquid museums and the climate crisis. In: Cameron FR, Kelly L (eds) Hot topics, public culture, museums. Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 112–128Google Scholar
  4. Cameron FR (2011) From mitigation to complex reflexivity and creative imaginaries—museums and science centres in climate governance. Museum and society special issue: hot science, global citizens: the agency of the museum sector in climate change interventions, vol 9, no 2. http://www.le.ac.uk/ms/museumsociety.html. Last Accessed 3 June 2018
  5. Cameron FR (2012) Climate change, agencies, and the museum for a complex world. Mus Manag Curatorship 27(4):317–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron FR (2014a) Ecologizing experimentations: A method and manifesto for museums and science centres. In: Cameron FR, Neilson B (eds) Climate change, and museum futures. Routledge museum research series, pp 16–33Google Scholar
  7. Cameron FR (2014b) We are on nature’s side? Experimental work in re-writing narratives of climate change for museum exhibitions. In: Cameron FR, Neilson B (eds) Climate change, and museum futures. Routledge Museum Research Series, New York, pp 51–77Google Scholar
  8. Cameron FR (2015) The liquid museum: new ontologies for a climate changed world. In: Witcomb A, Message K (eds) Museum theory: an expanded field. Blackwell, UK, pp 345–362Google Scholar
  9. Cameron FR (2018) Posthuman museum practices. In: Braidotti R, Hlavajova M (eds) Posthuman glossary. Bloomsbury Academic, London, pp 349–352Google Scholar
  10. Cameron FR, Deslandes, A (2011). Museums and science centres as sites for deliberative democracy on climate change. Museum and society special issue: hot science, global citizens: The agency of the museum sector in climate change interventions, vol 9, no 2. http://www.le.ac.uk/ms/museumsociety.html. Last Accessed 3 June 2018
  11. deLanda M (2006) A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  13. Descola P (2013) Beyond nature and culture. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Domanska E (2010) Beyond anthropocentrism. Historical studies. Historein 10:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haraway D (2007) When species meet. University of Minnesota Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey G (2007) Animism: respecting the living world. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodge B (2011) Climate change and the museum sector: 10 reflections from the ‘Hot Science, Global Citizens’ symposium. Available at http://ccr.uws.edu.au/2011/05/18/climate-change-the-museum-sector-10-reflections-from-the-hot-science-global-citizens-symposium/. Last Accessed 18 Sept 2011
  18. Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour B (1998) To modernise or ecologize? That’s the question. In: Castree N, Willems-Braun B (eds) Remaking reality: nature at the millennium. Routledge, London, pp 221–242Google Scholar
  21. Latour B (2010) An attempt at a compositionist manifesto. New Literary Hist 41:471–490Google Scholar
  22. Morton T (2010) The ecological thought. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Nayar PK (2014) Posthuman. Polity, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Orstrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 20:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Protevi J (2013) Life war earth. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt J (2013) The empirical falsity of the human subject: new materialism, climate change and the shared critique of artiface. Resilience Int Politics Pract Discourses 1(3):174–192Google Scholar
  27. Stengers I (2015) In catastrophic times: resisting the coming barbarianism. Open Humanities Press, http://openhumanitiespress.org/books/download/Stengers_2015_In-Catastrophic-Times.pdf. Last Accessed 3 June 2018
  28. United Nations Development Programme, Sustainable Development Goals (2015) http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html. Last Accessed 3 June 2018
  29. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2016) Report on the Conference of the Parties held in Paris, 30th November to 13th December 2015. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/FCCC_CP_2015_10_Add.1.pdf. Last Accessed 3 June 2018
  30. Viveiros de Castro E (2005) Perspective and multi-naturalism in indigenous America. In: Surrallés A, García Hierro P (eds) The land within: indigenous territory and the perception of the environment IWGIA. Denmark, Copenhagen, pp 36–75Google Scholar
  31. Wolfe C (2010) What is posthumanism?. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  32. Woolgar S, Lezaun J (2013) The wrong bin bag: a turn to ontology. Soc Stud Sci 43:321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Culture and Society (TemaQ), Department of Societal Development and Culture Studies (ISAK)Linköping University (LIU)LinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations