Advertisement

Moving Forward in Climate Change Communication: Recommendations for Rethinking Strategies and Frames

  • Annemarie KörfgenEmail author
  • Alina Kuthe
  • Sybille Chiari
  • Andrea Prutsch
  • Lars Keller
  • Johann Stötter
Chapter
  • 750 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Climate change communication tailored to different target groups aims at creating awareness of climate change and willingness to engage in climate change mitigation, adaptation, and transformation, thus fostering a development towards a low-carbon society. As there is a long way to reach these goals, the question remains how to create effective communication strategies and topics. This paper identifies the status quo of climate change communication including existing challenges by taking the example of Austria. 101 stakeholders from science, civil society, public administration, media, and economy, who are actively communicating climate change, were questioned on their goals, target groups, strategies, and topics of communication. Further, they were asked to assess existing challenges in climate change communication from their experience as communicators. In order to derive recommendations for a practical application, the results were discussed in expert interviews. Recommendations include a stronger institutionalisation of climate change communication as well as target-group-specific communication strategies. The findings presented in this paper contribute to a greater understanding of climate change communication in its practical dimension. They can support stakeholders in applying climate change communication approaches aiming towards sustainable development, by contributing to the implementation of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.

Keywords

Climate change communication Communicator’s experience Communication strategies Framing Transdisciplinarity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Climate Change Centre Austria (CCCA) for financing the networking project C4AustriaConnecting Climate Change Communicators in Austria. The paper has additionally been prepared in the framework of ACRP financing—special thanks go to the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund. Further, we would like to thank everyone who has contributed to the success of this study, especially the climate change communicators involved in the project, the participants of the online-survey, and the interviewed experts.

References

  1. Bodansky D (2001) The History of the global climate change regime. In: Luterbacher U, Sprinz DF (eds) International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 23–40Google Scholar
  2. Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change. The role of human values. WIREs Clim Change 5(3):411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corner A, Lewandowsky S, Phillips M, Robert O (2015) The uncertainty handbook. University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  4. Frick J, Kaiser FG, Wilson M (2004) Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior. Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality Individ Differ 37(8):1597–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gammelgaard Ballantyne A (2016) Climate change communication. What can we learn from communication theory? WIREs Clim Change 2:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grothmann T, Leitner M, Glas N, Prutsch A (2017) A five-steps methodology to design communication formats that can contribute to behavior change. SAGE Open 7(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helfferich C (2014) Leitfaden- und Experteninterviews. In: Baur N, Blasius J (eds) Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp 559–574Google Scholar
  8. Kagawa F, Selby D (2013) Ready for the storm: education for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and mitigation. J Educ Sustain Develop 6(2):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  11. Lidskog R, Elander I (2009) Addressing climate change democratically. Multi-level governance, transnational networks and governmental structures. Sustain Dev 18:32–41Google Scholar
  12. Lorenz S (2010) Das Klima erkennen, verhandeln, prozessieren - Ein Einblick und Vorschlag zur transdisziplinären Diskussion. In: Voss M (Ed) Der Klimawandel. Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maibach E, Myers T, Leiserowitz A (2014) Climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth’s Future 2(5):295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayring P (2003) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  15. Mex G, Mruck K (2011) Qualitative Interviews. In: Naderer G, Balzer E (eds) Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp 258–288Google Scholar
  16. Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim Change 1(1):31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moser SC (2016) Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century. What more is there to say? WIREs. Clim Change 113:92Google Scholar
  18. Moser SC, Dilling L (2011) Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  19. Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. WIREs Clim Chang 1(1):97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson-Cole SA (2005) Representing climate change futures. A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29(3):255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Develop 51(2):12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96(10):1767–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation. Sci Commun 30(3):305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oreskes N (2004) Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702):369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oreskes N, Conway E (2010) Merchants of doubt. How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Otto-Banaszak I, Matczak P, Wesseler J, Wechsung F (2011) Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews. Reg Environ Change 11(2):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WBGU (2011) Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. WBGU, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Weingart P, Engels A, Pansegrau P (2000) Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understand Sci 9(3):261–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wibeck V (2014) Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups: local or distant, gradual or catastrophic? Public Understand Sci 2(23):204–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annemarie Körfgen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alina Kuthe
    • 1
  • Sybille Chiari
    • 2
  • Andrea Prutsch
    • 3
  • Lars Keller
    • 1
  • Johann Stötter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geography, University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Center for Global Change and Sustainability, University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.UmweltbundesamtViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations