Advertisement

Klima|Anlage—Performing Climate Data

  • Katharina Groß-VogtEmail author
  • Thomas Hermann
  • Martin W. Jury
  • Andrea K. Steiner
  • Sukandar Kartadinata
Chapter
  • 682 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

The urgent need to inform the general public about climate change is evident. Typically, this is done with the aid of visual and textual interpretations of findings of climate research. Other modes of perception might attract more attention. Sonification is a relatively new means of perceptualizing data by translating it into sound. This paper describes the Klima|Anlage, a walk-in sound installation “performing climate data”. The climate data for this purpose were obtained from a global climate modeling experiment providing climate projections for the latest assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate data from 1950 to 2100 can be chosen interactively by the listener for twelve selected regions of the world. The installation is based on four sound generators: a drip device with controlled drip rate for precipitation data, a record player with marble disks for wind data, a tetrachord instrument that is excited by radiation data, and three thunder sheets that play air temperature data. In addition, purely electronic sounds convey data of the global greenhouse gas concentrations. The Klima|Anlage has been exhibited at several locations since 2015, and excerpts of the sound recordings have been broadcast on Deutschlandradio, a German radio station. Sound and video examples may be accessed at http://klima-anlage.org/ and as supplementary material to this paper (http://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2914786). This paper contributes to a greater understanding of how to communicate complex scientific data to the public, using innovative communication channels. Conclusions on the design of the Klima|Anlage can be generalized to other sound installations at the border of science and media arts.

Keywords

Sonification Auditory display Climate modeling Media arts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Marcus Gammel initiated the project and led it with great care and involvement. Werner Cee was responsible for the main sound layout and for creating the instruments. Esther Schelander accompanied the project workshops and created the feature for Deutschlandradio. Valdis Wish of the Bureau for Digital Good is responsible for the website. Thanks to Hanns Holger Rutz for help with the preparation of data. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling for the provision of CMIP5 model output, as well as the climate modeling group of the Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany, for producing and making available their model output. This research was partly supported by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277) at Bielefeld University, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under research grant P24159 (SysSon). Many thanks to Hank Fullenwider for proofreading and giving feedback for this manuscript.

References

  1. Cesarini D, Ungerechts B, Hermann T (2015) Swimmers in the loop: sensing moving water masses for an auditive biofeedback system. In: 2015 IEEE sensors applications symposium (SAS) proceedings, IEEE,  https://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2718039
  2. Dombois F (2002) In: Schürmann A, Weiss B (eds) Wann hören? Vom Forschen mit den OhrenGoogle Scholar
  3. Galison P (1997) Image and logic. A material culture of microphysics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ISBN 9780226279176Google Scholar
  4. Gaver WW (1986) Auditory icons: using sound in computer interfaces. Hum Comput Interact 2:167–177.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0202_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giorgetta MA, Jungclaus J, Reick CH, Legutke S, Bader J, Böttinger M, Brovkin V, Crueger T, Esch M, Fieg K, Glushak K, Gayler V, Haak H, Hollweg H-D, Ilyina T, Kinne S, Kornblueh L, Matei D, Mauritsen T, Mikolajewicz U, Mueller W, Notz D, Pithan F, Raddatz T, Rast S, Redler R, Roeckner E, Schmidt H, Schnur R, Segschneider J, Six KD, Stockhause M, Timmreck C, Wegner J, Widmann H, Wieners K-H, Claussen M, Marotzke J, Stevens B (2013) Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5. J Adv Modeling Earth Syst 5:572–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goudarzi V (2015) Designing an interactive audio interface for climate science. IEEE Multimed 22:41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2015.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halim Z, Baig R, Bashir S (2006) Sonification: a novel approach towards data mining. In: 2006 International Conference on Emerging Technologies, Peshawar, IEEE, 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2006.336029
  8. Hermann T (2008) Taxonomy and definitions for sonification and auditory display. In: Susini P, Warusfel O (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2008), IRCAMGoogle Scholar
  9. Hermann T, Baier G (2013). Sonification of the human EEG. In: Franinović K, Serafin S (eds) Sonic interaction design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 285–297Google Scholar
  10. Hermann T, Drees JM, Ritter H (2003) Broadcasting auditory weather reports—a pilot project. In: Brazil E, Shinn-Cunningham B (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display, Boston University Publications, Production DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermann T, Nehls AV, Eitel F, Barri T, Gammel M (2012) Tweetscapes—real-time sonification of twitter data streams for radio broadcasting. In: Nees MA, Walker BN, Freeman J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2012)Google Scholar
  12. Keller JM, Prather E, Boynton VW, Enos LH, Jones VL, Pompea S, Slater T, Quinn M (2003) Educational testing of an auditory display regarding seasonal variation of martian polar ice caps. In: Brazil E, Shinn-Cunningham B (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2003)Google Scholar
  13. Kramer G, Walker B, Bonebright T, Cook P, Flowers J, Miner N, Neuhoff J, Bargar R, Barrass S, Berger J, Evreinov G, Fitch W, Gröhn M, Handel S, Kaper H, Levkowitz H, Lodha S, Shinn-Cunningham B, Simoni M, Tipei S (1999) The sonification report: status of the field and research agenda. Report prepared for the national science foundation by members of the international community for auditory display. ICAD, Santa FeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladstädter F, Steiner AK, Lackner BC, Kirchengast G, Muigg P, Kehrer J, Doleisch H (2009) SimVis: an interactive visual field exploration tool applied to climate research. In: Steiner AK, Pirscher B, Foelsche U, Kirchengast G (eds) New horizons in occultation research: studies in atmosphere and climate. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Ladstädter F, Steiner AK, Lackner BC, Pirscher B, Kirchengast G, Kehrer J, Hauser H, Muigg P, Doleisch H (2010) Exploration of climate data using interactive visualization. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 667–679.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jtecha1374.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nocke T, Sterzel T, Böttinger M, Wrobel M (2008) Visualization of climate and climate change data: an overview. Digital earth summit on geoinformatics 2008: tools for global change research (ISDE’08). Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 226–232Google Scholar
  17. Polli A (2005) Atmospherics/weather works: a spatialized meteorological data sonification project. Leonardo 38:31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2005.38.1.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quinn M (2001) Research set to music: the climate symphony and other sonifications of ice core, radar, DNA, seismic and solar wind data. In: Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2001)Google Scholar
  19. Rutz HH, Höldrich R (2017) A sonification interface unifying real-time and offline processing. In: Proceedings of the 14th sound and music computing conference (SMC), Espoo, SMCGoogle Scholar
  20. Rutz HH, Vogt K, Höldrich R (2015) The SysSon platform: a computer music perspective of sonification. In: Vogt K, Andreopoulou A, Goudarzi V (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2015)Google Scholar
  21. Speeth S (1961) Seismometer sounds. J Acous Soc Am 33:909–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Steiner AK, Lackner BC, Ladstädter F, Scherllin-Pirscher B, Foelsche U, Kirchengast G (2011) GPS radio occultation for climate monitoring and change detection. RadioSci 46.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010rs004614
  23. Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley P (eds) 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324Google Scholar
  24. Supper A (2011) The search for the ‘‘killer application’’: drawing the boundaries around the sonification of scientific data. In: Pinch T, Bijsterveld K (eds) The Oxford handbook of sound studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195388947.013.0064Google Scholar
  25. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteor Soc 93:485–498.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris agreement. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
  27. Vogt K (2010) Sonification of simulations in computational physics. University of Music and Performing Arts GrazGoogle Scholar
  28. Vogt K, Goudarzi V, Höldrich R (2012) SysSon—a systematic procedure to develop sonifications. In: Proceedings of the international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2012)Google Scholar
  29. Vogt K, Pirrò D, Kobenz I, Höldrich R, Eckel G (2010) PhysioSonic—evaluated movement sonification as auditory feedback in physiotherapy. In: Ystad S, Aramaki M, Kronland-Martinet R, Jensen K (eds) Auditory display. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5954. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12439-6_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilhelmsen H, Ladstädter F, Scherllin-Pirscher B, Steiner AK (2018) Atmospheric QBO and ENSO indices with high vertical resolution from GNSS radio occultation temperature measurements. Atmos Meas Tech 11:1333–1346. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1333-2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Groß-Vogt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Hermann
    • 2
  • Martin W. Jury
    • 3
  • Andrea K. Steiner
    • 3
  • Sukandar Kartadinata
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics, University of Music and Performing Arts GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Ambient Intelligence GroupCITEC, Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  3. 3.Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, University of GrazGrazAustria
  4. 4.Free Music Instrument Builder, GluiBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations