Skip to main content

Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications of Surgery for Male Urinary and Fecal Incontinence

Abstract

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is most commonly a consequence of prostatic surgery except when symptoms are driven by a neurological concomitant condition. Hence, compared to what urologists know about current clinical practice in female SUI, the diagnostic phase in men is a very particular and important step in the management of the disease, with accurate evaluation of the clinical context, SUI cause, quality of life assessment, and patient complaints [1, 2]. Improvements in urinary leakage after prostatic surgery (RP and TURP) may occur spontaneously or with conservative measures within the first 12 months after surgery. However, management of persistent incontinence is often challenging and may be frustrating for both a patient and his doctor, and as a consequence, it can negatively affect patients’ quality of life and doctor–patient relationship [3]. Urinary incontinence causes problems, such as poor hygiene and loss of self-confidence that directly affect the quality of life of patients. The mechanism for male SUI after prostate surgery appears to be internal sphincter deficiency. The probable mechanism for internal sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery includes rhabdo-sphincter injury during apical dissection, large and deep sutures during vesico-urethral anastomosis, or injury of the neurovascular bundles [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, et al. EAU guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012a;62:1130–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012b;62:1118–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crivellaro S, Morlacco A, Bodo G, Agro’ EF, Gozzi C, Pistolesi D, Del Popolo G, Ficarra V. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(8):875–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta S, Peterson AC. Stress urinary incontinence in the prostate cancer survivor. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(4):395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hubner W, et al. Contemporary management of post prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59:985–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Appell RA. Collagen injection therapy for urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21:177–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stenberg A, Larsson E, Lindholm A, Ronneus B, Stenberg A, Läckgren G. Injectable dextranomer-based implant: histopathology, volume changes and DNA analysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999;33:355–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, et al. Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA. 1984;251:3277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Onur R, Singla A. Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence. Int J Urol. 2006;13:1207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire EJ. Urethral bulking agents. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:234–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C, et al. Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol. 2012;188:205–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, et al. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189:602–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith D, Appell R, Rackley R, et al. Collagen injection therapy for post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1998;160:364–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Westney O, Bevan-Thomas R, Palmer J, et al. Transurethral collagen injections for male intrinsic sphincter deficiency: the University of Texas-Houston experience. J Urol. 2005;174:994–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafik A. Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence. Int Surg. 1993;78:159–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Altomare DF, La Torre F, Rinaldi M, Binda G, Pescatori M. Carbon-coated microbeads anal injection in outpatient treatment of minor fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;5:432–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG. Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1526–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. La Torre F, de la Portilla F. Long-term efficacy of dextranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA/dx) for treatment of faecal incontinence. Color Dis. 2013;15:569–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratto C, Parello A, Dionisi L, et al. Novel bulking agent for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1644–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Kerrebroeck P, ter Meulen F, Farrelly E, et al. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence: recent developments in the role of urethral injection. Urol Res. 2003;30:356–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pycha A, Klinger CH, Haitel A, et al. Implantable microballoons: an attractive alternative in the management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 1998;33:469–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Menard S, Porta GD. Incidence, growth and antigenicity of fibrosarcomas induced by Teflon disc in mice. Tumori. 1976;62:565–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Witherspoon P, Bryson G, Wright DM, et al. Carcinogenic potential of commonly used hernia repair prostheses in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2004;91:368–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tjandra J, Tan JJ, Lim F, Murray-Green C. Long-term results of injectable silicone biomaterial for passive fecal incontinence – a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:730–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank, DIEGO COLETTA, NORMA DEPALMA and ILARIA CLEMENTI for contributing to the realization of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pennisi, M., Pastore, A.L., La Torre, F. (2020). Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. In: Siracusano, S., Dodi, G., Pennisi, M., Gozzi, C., Pastore, A., Cerruto, M. (eds) Complications of Surgery for Male Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98263-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98264-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics