Skip to main content

Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Complications of Surgery for Male Urinary and Fecal Incontinence

Abstract

The incidence of SUI after radical prostatectomy has been reported to range from 8% to 47% [1–4], whereas the incidence of SUI after benign prostatic surgery has been reported to be 0.5% [5]. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment should be considered. AUS is considered the gold standard treatment for male SUI, with a success rate ranging from 59% to 90% and a patient satisfaction rate of 76% [6, 7]. However, the revision rate for AUS is relatively high (20% to 29%) owing to infection, urethral erosion, and mechanical failure [6, 7]. Compared with AUS, a male sling operation has several advantages, including the absence of mechanical problems, no need for device training, immediate efficacy, and an overall reduced revision rate. The success rate of a male sling operation ranges from 54% to 83% [8, 9]. However, urinary retention, erosion, infection, system dislocation, and persistent pain are possible complications of a male sling operation, whereas technical difficulty is another problem in patients who have undergone radical pelvic surgery [10].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Ping R, et al. Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions. Rev Urol. 2009;11:145–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kundu S, Roehl K, Eggener S, et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004;172:2227–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JC, Cho KJ. Current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:511–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Begg C, Riedel E, Bach P, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1138–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166:1755–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trigo Rocha F, Gomes CM, Mitre AI, Arap S, Srougi M. A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology. 2008;71:85–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cornel EB, Elzevier HW, Putter H. Can advance transobturator sling suspension cure male urinary postoperative stress incontinence? J Urol. 2010;183:1459–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hübner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER. Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2011;107:777–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elsergany R, Ghoniem GM. Collagen injection for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in men: a reasonable option in selected patients. J Urol. 1998;159:1504–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Westney OL, Bevan-Thomas R, Palmer JL, Cespedes RD, McGuire EJ. Transurethral collagen injections for male intrinsic sphincter deficiency: the University of Texas-Houston experience. J Urol. 2005;174:994–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, Sande JR, Barham SS, Benson RC Jr, et al. Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA. 1984;251:3277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Faerber GJ, Richardson TD. Long-term results of transurethral collagen injection in men with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Endourol. 1997;11:273–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cespedes RD. Collagen injection or artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: collagen. Urology. 2000;55:5–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aboseif SR, O’Connell HE, Usui A, McGuire EJ. Collagen injection for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in men. J Urol. 1996;155:10–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO. Transurethral collagen injections in the therapy of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1996;155:1011–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Griebling TL, Kreder KJ, Williams RD. Transurethral collagen injection for treatment of post prostatectomy incontinence in men. Urology. 1997;49:907–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stothers L, Goldenberg SL. Delayed hypersensitivity and systemic arthralgia following transurethral collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1998;159:1507–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santarosa RP, Blaivas JG. Periurethral injection of autologous fat for the treatment of sphincteric incontinence. J Urol. 1994;151:607–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kylmala T, Tainio H, Raitanen M, Tammela TL. Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence using transurethral macroplastique injections. J Endourol. 2003;17:113–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO. Transurethral collagen injections in the therapy of post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence. J Urol. 1996;155:1011–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klutke JJ, Subir C, Andriole G, Klutke CG. Long-term results after antegrade collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1999;53:974–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martins FE, Bennett CJ, Dunn M, Filho D, Keller T, Lieskovsky G. Adverse prognostic features of collagen injection therapy for urinary incontinence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;158:1745–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Colombo T, Augustin H, Breinl E, Schips L, Hubmer G. The use of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol. 1997;80:923–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bridges MD, Petrou SP, Lightner DJ. Urethral bulking agents: imaging review. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(1):257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lightner DJ. Review of the available urethral bulking agents. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:333–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweat SD, Lightner DJ. Complications of sterile abscess formation and pulmonary embolism following periurethral bulking agents. J Urol. 1999;161:93–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McKinney CD, Gaffey MJ, Gillenwater JY. Bladder outlet obstruction after multiple periurethral polytetrafluoroethylene injections. J Urol. 1995;153:149–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hartanto VH, Lightner DJ, Nitti VW. Endoscopic evacuation of Durasphere. Urology. 2003;62:135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Kerrebroeck P, ter Meulen F, Larsson G, Farrelly E, Edwall L, Fianu-Jonasson A. Efficacy and safety of a novel system (NASHA/dx copolymer using the Implacer device) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2004;64:276–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ter Meulen PH, Berghmans LC, van Kerrebroeck PE. Systematic review: efficacy of silicone microimplants (Macroplastique) therapy for stress urinary incontinence in adult women. Eur Urol. 2003;44:573–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pannek J, Brands FH, Senge T. Particle migration after transurethral injection of carbon coated beads for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2001;166:1350–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Solomon LZ, Birch BR, Cooper AJ, Davies CL, Holmes SA. Nonhomologous bioinjectable materials in urology: ‘size matters’? BJU Int. 2000;85:641–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Watson NF, et al. Color Dis. 2012;14(Suppl 3):29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guerra F, La Torre M, Giuliani G, Coletta D, Amore Bonapasta S, Velluti F, et al. Long-term evaluation of bulking agents for the treatment of fecal incontinence: clinical outcomes and ultrasound evidence. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19:23–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG. Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1526–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Morris OJ, Smith S, Draganic B. Comparison of bulking agents in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:517–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ratto C, Buntzen S, Aigner F, Altomare DF, Heydari A, Donisi L, Lundby L, Parello A. Multicentre observational study of the Gatekeeper for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2016;103:290–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Ozaibi L, Kazim Y, Hazim W, Al-Mazroui A, Al-Badri F. The Gatekeeper™ for fecal incontinence: another trial and error. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:936–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. de la Portilla F, Reyes-Díaz ML, Maestre MV, Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, García-Cabrera AM, Vázquez-Monchul JM, Díaz-Pavón JM, Padillo-Ruiz FC. Ultrasonographic evidence of Gatekeeper™ prosthesis migration in patients treated for faecal incontinence: a case series. Int J Color Dis. 2017;32(3):437–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Diego Coletta, Norma Depalma, and Ilaria Clementi for contributing to the realization of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Luigi Pastore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pennisi, M., Pastore, A.L., La Torre, F. (2020). Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. In: Siracusano, S., Dodi, G., Pennisi, M., Gozzi, C., Pastore, A., Cerruto, M. (eds) Complications of Surgery for Male Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98263-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98264-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics