Abstract
The incidence of SUI after radical prostatectomy has been reported to range from 8% to 47% [1–4], whereas the incidence of SUI after benign prostatic surgery has been reported to be 0.5% [5]. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment should be considered. AUS is considered the gold standard treatment for male SUI, with a success rate ranging from 59% to 90% and a patient satisfaction rate of 76% [6, 7]. However, the revision rate for AUS is relatively high (20% to 29%) owing to infection, urethral erosion, and mechanical failure [6, 7]. Compared with AUS, a male sling operation has several advantages, including the absence of mechanical problems, no need for device training, immediate efficacy, and an overall reduced revision rate. The success rate of a male sling operation ranges from 54% to 83% [8, 9]. However, urinary retention, erosion, infection, system dislocation, and persistent pain are possible complications of a male sling operation, whereas technical difficulty is another problem in patients who have undergone radical pelvic surgery [10].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Ping R, et al. Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions. Rev Urol. 2009;11:145–65.
Kundu S, Roehl K, Eggener S, et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004;172:2227–31.
Kim JC, Cho KJ. Current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:511–8.
Begg C, Riedel E, Bach P, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1138–44.
Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969–80.
Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166:1755–8.
Trigo Rocha F, Gomes CM, Mitre AI, Arap S, Srougi M. A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes. Urology. 2008;71:85–9.
Cornel EB, Elzevier HW, Putter H. Can advance transobturator sling suspension cure male urinary postoperative stress incontinence? J Urol. 2010;183:1459–63.
Hübner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER. Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2011;107:777–82.
Elsergany R, Ghoniem GM. Collagen injection for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in men: a reasonable option in selected patients. J Urol. 1998;159:1504–6.
Westney OL, Bevan-Thomas R, Palmer JL, Cespedes RD, McGuire EJ. Transurethral collagen injections for male intrinsic sphincter deficiency: the University of Texas-Houston experience. J Urol. 2005;174:994–7.
Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, Sande JR, Barham SS, Benson RC Jr, et al. Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon). JAMA. 1984;251:3277–81.
Faerber GJ, Richardson TD. Long-term results of transurethral collagen injection in men with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Endourol. 1997;11:273–7.
Cespedes RD. Collagen injection or artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: collagen. Urology. 2000;55:5–7.
Aboseif SR, O’Connell HE, Usui A, McGuire EJ. Collagen injection for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in men. J Urol. 1996;155:10–3.
Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO. Transurethral collagen injections in the therapy of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1996;155:1011–3.
Griebling TL, Kreder KJ, Williams RD. Transurethral collagen injection for treatment of post prostatectomy incontinence in men. Urology. 1997;49:907–12.
Stothers L, Goldenberg SL. Delayed hypersensitivity and systemic arthralgia following transurethral collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1998;159:1507–9.
Santarosa RP, Blaivas JG. Periurethral injection of autologous fat for the treatment of sphincteric incontinence. J Urol. 1994;151:607–11.
Kylmala T, Tainio H, Raitanen M, Tammela TL. Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence using transurethral macroplastique injections. J Endourol. 2003;17:113–5.
Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO. Transurethral collagen injections in the therapy of post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence. J Urol. 1996;155:1011–3.
Klutke JJ, Subir C, Andriole G, Klutke CG. Long-term results after antegrade collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1999;53:974–7.
Martins FE, Bennett CJ, Dunn M, Filho D, Keller T, Lieskovsky G. Adverse prognostic features of collagen injection therapy for urinary incontinence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;158:1745–9.
Colombo T, Augustin H, Breinl E, Schips L, Hubmer G. The use of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol. 1997;80:923–6.
Bridges MD, Petrou SP, Lightner DJ. Urethral bulking agents: imaging review. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(1):257–64.
Lightner DJ. Review of the available urethral bulking agents. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:333–8.
Sweat SD, Lightner DJ. Complications of sterile abscess formation and pulmonary embolism following periurethral bulking agents. J Urol. 1999;161:93–6.
McKinney CD, Gaffey MJ, Gillenwater JY. Bladder outlet obstruction after multiple periurethral polytetrafluoroethylene injections. J Urol. 1995;153:149–51.
Hartanto VH, Lightner DJ, Nitti VW. Endoscopic evacuation of Durasphere. Urology. 2003;62:135–7.
Van Kerrebroeck P, ter Meulen F, Larsson G, Farrelly E, Edwall L, Fianu-Jonasson A. Efficacy and safety of a novel system (NASHA/dx copolymer using the Implacer device) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2004;64:276–81.
ter Meulen PH, Berghmans LC, van Kerrebroeck PE. Systematic review: efficacy of silicone microimplants (Macroplastique) therapy for stress urinary incontinence in adult women. Eur Urol. 2003;44:573–82.
Pannek J, Brands FH, Senge T. Particle migration after transurethral injection of carbon coated beads for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2001;166:1350–3.
Solomon LZ, Birch BR, Cooper AJ, Davies CL, Holmes SA. Nonhomologous bioinjectable materials in urology: ‘size matters’? BJU Int. 2000;85:641–5.
Watson NF, et al. Color Dis. 2012;14(Suppl 3):29–33.
Guerra F, La Torre M, Giuliani G, Coletta D, Amore Bonapasta S, Velluti F, et al. Long-term evaluation of bulking agents for the treatment of fecal incontinence: clinical outcomes and ultrasound evidence. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19:23–7.
Hussain ZI, Lim M, Stojkovic SG. Systematic review of perianal implants in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1526–36.
Morris OJ, Smith S, Draganic B. Comparison of bulking agents in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:517–23.
Ratto C, Buntzen S, Aigner F, Altomare DF, Heydari A, Donisi L, Lundby L, Parello A. Multicentre observational study of the Gatekeeper for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2016;103:290–9.
Al-Ozaibi L, Kazim Y, Hazim W, Al-Mazroui A, Al-Badri F. The Gatekeeper™ for fecal incontinence: another trial and error. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:936–8.
de la Portilla F, Reyes-Díaz ML, Maestre MV, Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, García-Cabrera AM, Vázquez-Monchul JM, Díaz-Pavón JM, Padillo-Ruiz FC. Ultrasonographic evidence of Gatekeeper™ prosthesis migration in patients treated for faecal incontinence: a case series. Int J Color Dis. 2017;32(3):437–40.
Acknowledgements
We thank Diego Coletta, Norma Depalma, and Ilaria Clementi for contributing to the realization of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pennisi, M., Pastore, A.L., La Torre, F. (2020). Bulking Agents for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. In: Siracusano, S., Dodi, G., Pennisi, M., Gozzi, C., Pastore, A., Cerruto, M. (eds) Complications of Surgery for Male Urinary and Fecal Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98264-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98263-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98264-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)