Skip to main content

Using Joint Conversation Analysis Between Clinicians and Researchers: Developing Reflexivity in Community Mental Health Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interprofessional Care and Mental Health

Part of the book series: The Language of Mental Health ((TLMH))

Abstract

Analysing data in groups is highly beneficial in ensuring the credibility and accuracy of analysis. This chapter detailed how we developed joint Conversation Analysis (CA) groups run with clinicians and researchers. We outline how data groups work when using CA as the main framework for analysis, to ensure the credibility of the analysis. Limited research reports the use of joint analysis groups with participants, service users or clinicians. We review the challenges this approach creates and discuss how we were able to achieve this, and how it added to the research in enhancing confidence in the accuracy of transcriptions, and through ensuring the relevance of the analysis. We provide a protocol to guide how future joint analysis groups could be run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baxter, L., Thorne, T., & Mitchell, A. (2001). Small voices big noises. Exeter: Washington Singer Press. This report is also available from the INVOLVE website: www.invo.org.uk.

  • Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, J., Stronach, I., Bibi-Nawaz, S., Cahill, G., Cui, V., Dymoke, M., …, Mohd Khir, M. (2014). Deskilling data analysis: The virtues of dancing in the dark. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.795531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, S., Chambers, M., & Giles, M. (2015). Service user involvement in mental health care: An evolutionary concept analysis. Health Expectations. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mjøsund, N. H., Eriksson, M., Espnes, G. A., Haaland-Øverby, M., Jensen, S. L., Norheim, I., …, Vinje, H. F. (2017). Service user involvement enhanced the research quality in a study using interpretative phenomenological analysis—The power of multiple perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(1), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NICE. (2011). NICE CG136: Service user experience in adult mental health: Improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS mental health services. London: NICE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, A., Brannen, J., Elliott, H., Smithson, J., Morris, P., Smart, C., …, Bauer, E. (2016, April). Group analysis in practice: Narrative approaches. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2391.

  • Smart, C. A., & Denman, K. (2017). Student and supervisor experiences of learning and teaching conversation analysis and discursive psychology for autism spectrum disorder focused research: A reflective approach. In M. O’Reilly, J. Lester, & T. Muskett (Eds.), A practical guide to social interaction research in autism spectrum disorders. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedmon, J., & Dallos, R. (2009). Reflective practice in psychotherapy and counselling. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, A., Greenwood, K. E., Williams, S., Wykes, T., & Rose, D. S. (2013). Hearing the voices of service user researchers in collaborative qualitative data analysis: The case for multiple coding. Health Expectations, 16(4), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cordet Smart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A—Handouts Used

Appendix A—Handouts Used

(See, Table 14.1 and Fig. 14.1).

Table 14.1 Transcription symbols adapted from Jefferson (1984)
Fig. 14.1
figure 1

Handout used to introduce conversation analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smart, C., Reed, H., Tremblett, M., Froomberg, N. (2018). Using Joint Conversation Analysis Between Clinicians and Researchers: Developing Reflexivity in Community Mental Health Teams. In: Smart, C., Auburn, T. (eds) Interprofessional Care and Mental Health. The Language of Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics