Abstract
The economics of fusion power is addressed by looking at various financing models which have emerged for existing nuclear power plants (NPPs) now on the grid, with emphasis on the progression from early, strongly government-supported finance models to corporate balance-sheet funding. The concepts of debt and equity funding are studied from the payback schedule and the net present value (NPV) concept, i.e., “the cost of money,” tied in with the internal rate of return (IRR). Some novel approaches such as the Finnish Mankala model and the French Exeltium model are studied from the perspective of future fusion reactor financing. Modified government support in the form of Export credit agencies (ECAs) and loan guarantees is also discussed. The licensing process for NPPs is discussed, and what the key points for licensing a fusion NPP will be. Environmental impacts of fusion NPPs are seen from tritium dose calculations for routine release, with a discussion of prevailing winds. Accident scenarios are discussed from the standpoint of a design basis accident, and the strengths and weaknesses of fault tree analysis are examined. Plume models for release of activated wall materials are shown. Finally, some simple design recommendations for the safe operation of fusion NPPs are given.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrew, P., Brennan, P., Coad, J., Ehrenberg, J., Gadeberg, M., Gibson, A., Hillis, D., How, J., Jarvis, O., Jensen, H., Lässer, R., Marcus, F., Monk, R., Morgan, P., Orchard, J., Peacock, A., Pick, M., Rossi, A., Schild, P., Schunke, B., Stork, D., Pearce, R.: Tritium retention and clean-up in JET. Fusion Eng. Des. 47(2), 233–245 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(99)00084-8; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379699000848
Ashley, R.L., et al.: SRE fuel element damage, final report of the Atomics International Ad Hoc Committee. Technical report, NAA-SR-4488-supl. Atomics International, Canoga Park (1961). https://www.etec.energy.gov/Library/Main/Doc._No._2_SRE_Fuel_Element_Damage_Final_Report_1961_NAA-SR-4488_(suppl).pdf
Conn, R., Holdren, J., Sharafat, S., Steiner, D., Ehst, D., Hogan, W., Krakowski, R., Miller, R., Najmabadi, F., Schultz, K.: Economic, safety and environmental prospects of fusion reactors. Nucl. Fusion 30(9), 1919 (1990). http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/30/i=9/a=015
Hagen, E.: Kahl relay common-mode failure. Nucl. Saf. 20, 579–581 (1979)
Hollnagel, E., Fujita, Y.: The Fukushima disaster - systemic failures as the lack of resilience. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 45(1), 13–20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.03.2011.078; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315300024
Iida, H., Seki, Y., Ide, T.: Induced activity and dose rate in a fusion reactor with molybdenum blanket structure. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 14(11), 836–838 (1977)
Kazimi, M.: Safety aspects of fusion. Nucl. Fusion 24(11), 1461 (1984). http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/24/i=11/a=007
Kovari, M., Coleman, M., Cristescu, I., Smith, R.: Tritium resources available for fusion reactors. Nucl. Fusion 58(2), 026010 (2018). http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/58/i=2/a=026010
McKone, T.E., Brand, K.P., Shan, C.: Environmental health risk assessment for tritium releases at the National Tritium Labeling Facility at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Technical report, LBL-37760. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley (1997). http://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/environmental_health-risk_assesment.pdf
Merrill, B.J.: A lithium-air reaction model for the melcor code for analyzing lithium fires in fusion reactors. Fusion Eng. Des. 54(3), 485–493 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00577-9, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379600005779
Neilson, R.: Volatility of V15Cr5Ti fusion reactor alloy. J. Nucl. Mater. 141–143, 607–610 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(86)90062-0; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022311586900620
Office of Nuclear Safety, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security: Technical report for calculations of atmospheric dispersion at onsite locations for Department of Energy nuclear facilities. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy (2015). https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f22/Technical-Report-for%20-Calculations-of-Atmospheric-Dispersion-at-Onsite-Locations-for-DOE-Nuclear-Facilities.pdf
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Advice letter to the California Public Utilities Commision (2017). https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/adviceletter/GAS_3887-G.pdf
Piet, S.J., Kazimi, M.S., Lidsky, L.M.: Modeling of fusion activation product release and reactor damage from rapid structural oxidation. Nucl. Technol. Fusion 4(2P3), 1115–1120 (1983). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A23007
Piet, S.J., Kazimi, M.S., Lidsky, L.M.: Relative public health effects from accidental release of fusion structural radioactivity. Nucl. Technol. Fusion 4(2P2), 533–538 (1983). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A22918
Piet, S., Kraus, H., Neilson, R., Jones, J.: Oxidation/volatilization rates in air for candidate fusion reactor blanket materials, pca and ht-9. J. Nucl. Mater. 141–143, 24–28 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(86)80005-8; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022311586800058
Reilly, F.: Innovative ways of funding nuclear power projects. World Nuclear News (18 Feb 2016). http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/V-Innovative-ways-of-funding-nuclear-power-projects-18021601.html
Russell, R.: Muni bonds: The most dangerous bonds to own: defaults are rare, but risks remain. U. S. News and World Report (22 Feb 2013). https://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-smarter-mutual-fund-investor/2013/02/22/muni-bonds-the-most-dangerous-bonds-to-own
Sugiyama, G., Nasstrom, J., Pobanz, B., Foster, K., Simpson, M., Vogt, P., Aluzzi, F., Homann, S.: Atmospheric dispersion modeling: challenges of the Fukushima Dai-ichi response. Health Phys. J. 102(5), 493–508 (2012)
Tillack, M.S., Kazimi, M.S.: Modeling of lithium fires. Nucl. Technol. Fusion 2(2), 233–245 (1982). https://doi.org/10.13182/FST82-A20753
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency: §309: reviewers guidance for new nuclear power plant environmental impact statements. EPA Publication, 315-X-08-001 (2008). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/309-reviewers-guidance-for-new-nuclear-power-plant-eiss-pg.pdf
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commmission: Backgrounder on tritium, radiation protection limits, and drinking water standards (08 April 2016). https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/tritium-radiation-fs.html. Accessed 30 May 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morse, E. (2018). Economics, Environmental, and Safety Issues. In: Nuclear Fusion. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98171-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98171-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98170-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98171-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)