Skip to main content

Observability-Aware Post-Silicon Test Generation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Silicon Validation and Debug
  • 1042 Accesses

Abstract

Simulation is the most widely used form of validation using billions of random and pseudo-random tests in the traditional design flow. A critical problem in post-silicon debug is to generate efficient tests that both activate requisite coverage goal on the target hardware as well as produce results that are observable through a given on-chip design-for-debug architecture. Unfortunately, such tests cannot be generated directly from register-transfer level (RTL) models, both due to design complexity and due to bugs in the design itself. In this chapter, we discuss a directed test generation approach which facilities the observation of expected outputs of the generated tests using the traced signals. The proposed approach uses transaction-level models (TLM) for post-silicon test generation. The basic idea is to transform an RTL assertion as well as observability constraints to create a TLM assertion with observability constraints. The TLM assertion/property would be used to enable TLM analysis to generate post-silicon tests. Finally, the TLM test would be translated to an RTL test that is debug-friendly. In this chapter, we provide case studies from a number of different design classes to demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of the approach.

The content of this chapter has been developed based on [10] with permission from EDAA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For some assertions like \(P_{i} \rightarrow \) \(P_{j}\), backward traversal from \(P_{i}\) and forward traversal from \(P_{j}\) would be beneficial. However, in most of the cases performing one of them is enough.

References

  1. A. Adir, E. Almog, L. Fournier, E. Marcus, M. Vinov, A. Ziv, Genesys-pro: innovations in test program generation for functional processor verification. 2, 84–93 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Adir, S. Copty, S. Landa, A. Nahir, G. Shurek, A. Ziv, C. Meissner, J. Schumann, A unified methodology for pre-silicon verification and post-silicon validation, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) (2011), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ahmed, P. Mishra, Quebs: qualifying event based search in concolic testing for validation of RTL models, in 2017 IEEE 35th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ahmed, P. Mishra, Directed test generation using concolic testing of RTL models, in IEEE/ACM Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) (IEEE, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Basu, P. Mishra, Efficient trace signal selection for post silicon validation and debug, in 2011 24th International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSI Design) (2011), pp. 352 –357

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Bombieri, R. Filippozzi, G. Pravadelli, F. Stefanni, RTL property abstraction for TLM assertion-based verification, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) (2015), pp. 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cadence Berkeley Lab, http://www.kenmcmil.com. The Cadence SMV Model Checker

  8. M. Chen, P. Mishra, D. Kalita, Automatic RTL test generation from SystemC TLM specifications. 11(2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Chen, X. Qin, H. Koo, P. Mishra, System-Level Validation - High-Level Modeling and Directed Test Generation Techniques (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Farahmandi, P. Mishra, S. Ray, Exploiting transaction level models for observability-aware post-silicon test generation, in 2016 Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1477–1480

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Hong, Y. Li, S. Park, D. Mui, D. Lin, Z. Kaleq, N. Hakim, H. Naeimi, D. Gardner, S. Mitra, QED: quick error detection tests for effective post-silicon validation, in International Test Conference (ITC) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.F. Ko, N. Nicolici, Algorithms for state restoration and trace-signal selection for data acquisition in silicon debug. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 28(2), 285–297 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Li, Y. Guo, S. Li, Assertion-based automated functional vectors generation using constraint logic programming, in ACM Great Lakes Sympoisum on VLSI (2004), pp. 288–291

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Lin, T. Hong, F. Fallah, N. Hakim, S. Mitra, Quick detection of difficult bugs for effective post-silicon validation, in Design Automation Conference (DAC) (2012), pp. 561–566

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Liu, D. Sheridan, W. Tuohy, S. Vasudevan, Towards coverage closure: using goldmine assertions for generating design validation stimulus, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) (2011), pp. 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Liu, S. Vasudevan, Efficient validation input generation in RTL by hybridized source code analysis, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Patra, On the cusp of a validation wall. IEEE Des. Test Comput. 24, 193–196 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Rahmani, P. Mishra, S. Ray, Scalable trace signal selection using machine learning, in 2013 IEEE 31st International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) (2013), pp. 384–389

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Sabaghian-Bidgoli, P. Behnam, B. Alizadeh, Z. Navabi, Reducing search space for fault diagnosis: a probability-based scoring approach, in 2017 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 545–550

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Sadredini, R. Rahimi, P. Foroutan, M. Fathy, Z. Navabi, An improved scheme for pre-computed patterns in core-based soc architecture, in 2016 IEEE East-West Design and Test Symposium (EWDTS) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Sousa, A. Sen, Generation of TLM testbenches using mutation testing, in International Symposium on Harwdare Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Tong, M. Boule, Z. Zilic, Airwolf-tg: A test generator for assertion-based dynamic verification, in International Workshop on High Level Design Validation and Test (HLDVT) (2009), pp. 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Wagner, V. Bertacco, Reversi: post-silicon validation system for modern microprocessors, in International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) (2008), pp. 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Yerramilli, Addressing post-silicon validation challenge: leverage validation and test synergy. Keynote Int. Test Conf. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Zokaee, H. Sabaghian-Bidgoli, V. Janfaza, P. Behnam, Z. Navabi, A novel sat-based ATPG approach for transition delay faults, in 2017 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 17–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farimah Farahmandi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farahmandi, F., Mishra, P. (2019). Observability-Aware Post-Silicon Test Generation. In: Mishra, P., Farahmandi, F. (eds) Post-Silicon Validation and Debug. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98116-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98116-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98115-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98116-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics