Skip to main content

‘A Unique Way of Being’: The Place of Music in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performance Phenomenology

Part of the book series: Performance Philosophy ((PPH))

  • 866 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine Merleau-Ponty’s references to music in his classic text Phenomenology of Perception. This procedure reveals four major themes related to music, namely notions of motor space and tacit knowledge, the unity of music and sound, music and the tradition, and intersubjectivity and contestation. Recent work in neuroscience seems to bear out the relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s thinking to musicking as a fundamentally embodied process, what he terms ‘a unique way of being.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The grand piano, whose design and construction materials have largely become standardised since the 1860s (Rowland 1998) conforming to a keyboard layout of eighty-eight black and white notes, presents a different set of problems related to touch (how much bodily energy is required to produce a given musical dynamic)—that is, how the instrument responds to the performer’s actions at any given moment.

  2. 2.

    ‘Representations are one of the fundamental explanatory tools of cognitive science. Cognitive scientists regularly explain particular cognitive achievements (such as the navigational achievements of rats in mazes) by modeling how the organism is using representations of the environment’ (Bermúdez 2014, 11). However, the behaviour patterns of rats learning to navigate mazes do not begin to approach the ecological and cognitive complexity of the human experience of music. This begs the question as to the ‘size and shape’ of musical representations: Are these schema-based (Leman 1995), notation-based (for professional western art music practitioners), or altogether a fiction (Chemero 2011)?

  3. 3.

    See also Dreyfus (2006) for a discussion of the concepts of ‘intentional arc’ and ‘skilful coping’ from a contemporary neuroscientific perspective.

  4. 4.

    Defined (Reybrouck 2015, 5) as the immediate environment of the creature, following Uexkull.

  5. 5.

    Examples such as Joni Mitchell’s disastrous solo piano performance at the Isle of Wight Festival (1970) and the less than friendly reception of Ornette Coleman’s music come to mind, as well as the tumultuous reception history of works by composers such as Debussy and Stravinsky.

References

  • Arbib, Michael A. 2006. “The Mirror System Hypothesis on the Linkage of Action and Languages.” In Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, edited by Michael A. Arbib, 3–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez, José Luis. 2014. Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind. 2nd ed. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, Georgina, and David Hesmondhalgh. 2000. Western Music and Its Others: Difference, Representation, and Appropriation in Music. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Wayne. 2004. “Cognition and the Body: Perspectives from Music Education.” In Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Toward Embodied Teaching and Learning, edited by Liora Bresler, 29–50. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camurri, Antonio, and Gualterio Volpe. 2004. Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. Edited by Antonio Camurri and Gualterio Volpe. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, Anthony. 2011. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, Anthony, and Charles Heyser. 2013. “Methodology and Reduction in the Behavioral Sciences: Object Exploration as a Case Study.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience, edited by John Bickle, 68–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. 1998. “Embodied, Situated, and Distributed Cognition.” In A Companion to Cognitive Science, edited by William Bechtel and George Graham, 506–517. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. “An Embodied Cognitive Science?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9): 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01361-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. “Embodiment and Explanation.” In Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by Paco Calvo and Antoni Gomila, 41–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-046616-3.00003-7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Eric F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, Thomas. 1983. Music as Heard: A Study in Applied Phenomenology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coessens, Katherine, Darla Crispin, and Anne Douglas. 2009. The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto. Ghent: Orpheus Institute (Leuven University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Nicholas. 1992. Music, Imagination, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1997. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Diana. 1996. “The Perception of Auditory Patterns.” In Handbook of Perception and Action, edited by Wolfgang Prinz and Bruce Bridgeman, vol. 1, 253–296. Amsterdam: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1874-5822(96)80011-9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2002. “Intelligence Without Representation—Merleau-Ponty’s Critique of Mental Representation: The Relevance of Phenomenology to Scientific Explanation.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. “Merleau-Ponty and Recent Cognitive Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B. N. Hansen, 129–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duby, Marc. 2013. “‘Knowledge in the Hands’: Towards a Phenomenological Approach to Assessing Live Ensemble Performance.” Musicus 41 (1): 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. “In Search of the Improvising Body: Towards an Epistemology of Embodied Improvisation.” Sonic Ideas/Ideas Sónicas 6 (12): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrenne, Mikel. 1987. In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics. Edited by Mark S. Roberts and Dennis Gallagher. Contemporary Studies in Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck, Marlene Johansson, and Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. 2012. “Embodied Motivation for Metaphorical Meanings.” Cognitive Linguistics 23 (2): 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0008.

  • Gallagher, Shaun. 2006. “The Intrinsic Spatial Frame of Reference.” In A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Mark A. Wrathall. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. 02 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. “Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 35–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. “Phenomenology and Non-Reductionist Cognitive Science.” In Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, edited by Shaun Gallagher and Daniel Schmicking, 21–34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2003. “Embodied Experience and Linguistic Meaning.” Brain and Language 84: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00517-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2006. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Stuart. 2015. “Heidegger’s Augenblick as the Moment of the Performance.” In Performance and Temporalisation: Time Happens, edited by Stuart Grant, Jodie McNeilly, and Maeva Veerapen, 213–229. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Patricia, and Christopher Holmes. 2013. “The Performer’s Experience: A Case for Using Qualitative (Phenomenological) Methodologies in Music Performance Research.” Musicae Scientiae 17 (1): 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864912467633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hytönen-Ng, Elina. 2013. Experiencing “Flow” in Jazz Performance. Ashgate Popular and Folk Music Series. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, Marc. 1995. Music and Schema Theory: Cognitive Foundations of Systematic Musicology. Springer Series in Information Sciences. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, Pieter-Jan, Edith Van Dyck, Micheline Lesaffre, Marc Leman, and Pieter M. Kroonenberg. 2014. “The Coupling of Action and Perception in Musical Meaning Formation.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 32 (1): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2008.104.1.92.this.

  • Mazzola, Guerino, Paul B. Cherlin, Matthias Rissi, and Nathan Kennedy. 2009. Flow, Gesture, and Spaces in Free Jazz: Towards a Theory of Collaboration. Edited by Guerino Mazzola. Computational Music Science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge Classics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Eugene. 2011. “Phenomenology and the ‘Hard Problem’ of Consciousness and Music.” In Music and Consciousness: Philosophical, Psychological, and Cultural Perspectives, edited by David Clarke and Eric Clarke, 29–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Steven J., and Steven M. Demorest. 2009. “Cultural Constraints on Music Perception and Cognition.” In Progress in Brain Research, 67–77. New York: Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17805-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztop, Erhan, Michael A. Arbib, and Nina Bradley. 2006. “The Development of Grasping and the Mirror System.” In Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System, edited by Michael A. Arbib, 397–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2006. “Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and Intersubjectivity.” In A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism, edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Mark A. Wrathall. Oxford: Blackwell Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405110778.2006.00026.x.

  • Reybrouck, Mark. 2015. “Music as Environment: An Ecological and Biosemiotic Approach.” Behavioral Sciences 5 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5010001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. 2011. Merleau-Ponty and Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, David. 1998. “The Piano Since c.1825.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Piano, edited by David Rowland, 40–56. Cambridge: Cambridge Companions Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaug, Gottfried. 2015. “Musicians and Music Making as a Model for the Study of Brain Plasticity.” In Music, Neurology, and Neuroscience: Evolution, the Musical Brain, Medical Conditions, and Therapies, edited by Eckart Altenmüller, Stanley Finger, François Boller, 37–55. Progress in Brain Research, 217. New York: Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred. 1964. “Making Music Together: A Study in Social Relationship.” In Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, edited by Arvid Brodersen, 1976, 159–178. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serio, John N. 2009. Wallace Stevens: Selected Poems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2011. The Primacy of Movement. Expanded 2nd ed. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, Christopher. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Bob. 2000. Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toop, David. 2004. Haunted Weather: Music, Silence and Memory. London: Serpent’s Tail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books. https://doi.org/10.1038/143391a0.

  • Wiskus, Jessica. 2013. The Rhythm of Thought: Art, Literature, and Music after Merleau-Ponty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Duby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duby, M. (2019). ‘A Unique Way of Being’: The Place of Music in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. In: Grant, S., McNeilly-Renaudie, J., Wagner, M. (eds) Performance Phenomenology. Performance Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98059-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics