Skip to main content

Strategic Planning of Short Sea Shipping Within Maritime Clusters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics of Short Sea Shipping

Abstract

Industry clusters provide a novel framework for interpreting industries. They offer a penetrating understanding as to the rudiments of economic activity, within a region. There has been a substantial drive in recent years, to research and support the cluster concept, though this process is far from delivering an understanding without caveats and restrictions. Clusters can provide valuable insight within industries, as they pertain to eventualities that harbour collective health, for many organizations. This instance summates the basic strength, but also, the elementary weakness of the concept. At the same time, caution should be applied, as the construct is not straightforward, and is many times left to selective interpretation. This chapter aims at investigating the complementarities of strategic planning of short sea shipping within a maritime cluster perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amdam, R.P., and O. Bjarnar. 2015. Globalization and the development of industrial clusters: Comparing two Norwegian clusters, 1900–2010. Business History Review 894: 693–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arof, A.M., and R. Nair. 2017. The identification of key success factors for interstate Ro-Ro short sea shipping in Brunei-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines: A Delphi approach. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 9 (3): 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baindur, D., and J.M. Viegas. 2012. Success factors for developing viable motorways of the sea projects in Europe. Logistics Research 4 (3–4): 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baños, J. F., L. Valdés, E. Del Valle, and E. Zapico. 2018. Economic importance of the motorways of the sea for tourism: The experience of the route Nantes–Gijón. Maritime Economics and Logistics 20: 300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batur, T. 2010. Maritime clusterisation and cluster facilitators in the European Union [Pomorska klasterizacija i cimbenici razvitka u Europskoj Uniji]. Nase More 57 (5–6): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendall, H.B., and M.R. Brooks. 2011. Short sea shipping: Lessons for or from Australia. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 3 (4): 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, G.R.G., E. Berger, M. De La Forest, and J. Shum. 2003. A cluster analysis of the maritime sector in Norway. International Journal of Transport Management 14: 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergantino, A., S. Bolis, and C. Canali. 2006. A methodological framework to analyse the market opportunities of short sea shipping: The adaptive stated preference approach. In Towards better performing transport networks, 285–304. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, A., M.C. Dickow, and C. Drangmeister. 2010. Development potentials and networks of maritime clusters in Germany [Entwicklungspotenziale und Netzwerkbeziehungen maritimer Cluster in Deutschland]. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie 54 (3–4): 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunmüller, K. 1997. Communication strategies in the area of the hanseatic league: The approach by semi-communication. Multilingua 16 (4): 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, V., and M. Roe. 2010. The potential for the clustering of the maritime transport sector in the greater Dublin region. Maritime Policy and Management 371: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M.R., S.M. Puckett, D.A. Hensher, and A. Sammons. 2012. Understanding mode choice decisions: A study of Australian freight shippers. Maritime Economics and Logistics 14 (3): 274–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casaca, A.C.P., and P.B. Marlow. 2007. The impact of the trans-European transport networks on the development of short sea shipping. Maritime Economics and Logistics 9 (4): 302–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casaca, A.C.P., S. Carvalho, and M. Oliveira. 2013. Improving port of Sines competitiveness. A subjective benchmarking approach. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 5 (2): 174–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casaca, A.C.P., C.B. Galvão, L.T. Robles, and S.S. Cutrim. 2017. Domestic short sea shipping services in Brazil: Competition by enhancing logistics integration. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 9 (3): 280–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castejón Arqued, R. 1996. Commercial ports in Spain. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 87 (4): 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chainas, K. 2017. A dynamic routing system for short sea shipping following ship immobilization. International Journal of Business and Systems Research 11 (1–2): 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-C. 2011. Maritime clusters: What can be learnt from the south west of England. Ocean and Coastal Management 54 (6): 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhetri, P., T. Butcher, and B. Corbitt. 2014. Characterising spatial logistics employment clusters. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 443: 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, T.W. 2016. A study on logistics cluster competitiveness among Asia main countries using the Porter’s diamond model. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 324: 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of London. 2004. The future of London’s maritime services cluster: A call for action. Available at https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/business/economic-research-and-information/research-publications/Documents/2007-2000/The%20Future%20of%20London%E2%80%99s%20Maritime%20Services%20Cluster_executive%20summary.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2017.

  • Colbourne, B. 2006. St. John’s ocean technology cluster: Can government make it so? Canadian Public Administration 491: 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P.W. 2002. Clustering and performance: The case of maritime clustering in the Netherlands. Maritime Policy and Management 293: 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, A.-M., H.F. Zhong, H.L. Li, and J. Wang. 2013. Review of researches on logistics industry clusters sustainable development. In International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation: Core Areas of Industrial Engineering, IEMI 2012 – Proceedings, 1227–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D. 2017. What is a maritime cluster? Marine Policy 83: 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., and Y. Melançon. 2006. The ambitious wager of Quebec’s maritime cluster: Current situation and public policies [Le pari ambitieux du cluster maritime du Québec: État de la situation et politiques publiques]. Geographie Economie Societe 8 (4): 467–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., and R. Shearmur. 2009. Maritime clusters in diverse regional contexts: The case of Canada. Marine Policy 33 (3): 520–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., R. Shearmur, and D. Figueiredo. 2016. Québec’ coastal maritime cluster: Its impact on regional economic development, 2001–2011. Marine Policy 71: 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, W. 2010. Regional service clusters and networks. Two approaches to empirical identification and development: The case of logistics in the German port city-states Hamburg and Bremen. International Review of Applied Economics 241: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafaliou, I., M. Lekakou, and I. Theotokas. 2006. Is the European shipping industry aware of corporate social responsibility? The case of the Greek-owned short sea shipping companies. Marine Policy 30 (4): 412–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Macho, J., A. Murillas, A. Ansuategi, M. Escapa, C. Gallastegui, P. González, R. Prellezo, and J. Virto. 2015. Measuring the maritime economy: Spain in the European Atlantic arc. Marine Policy 60: 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. 2011. Under what conditions may social contracts arise? Evidence from the Hanseatic league. Constitutional Political Economy 22 (2): 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Hanseatic league and the concept of functional overlapping competing jurisdictions. Kyklos 65 (2): 194–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fløysand, A., S.E. Jakobsen, and O. Bjarnar. 2012. The dynamism of clustering: Interweaving material and discursive processes. Geoforum 435: 948–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosso, M., A.R. Lynce, A. Silla, and G.K. Vaggelas. 2010. Short sea shipping, intermodality and parameters influencing pricing policies: The Mediterranean case. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 11 (1): 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse, L.L. 2017. The evolution and transformation of industrial clusters: A conceptual model. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management 31 (1–3): 176–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilmola, O.-P., H. Lorentz, and D.L. Rhoades. 2015. New environmental demands and the future of the Helsinki-Tallinn freight route. Maritime Economics and Logistics 17 (2): 198–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. 2015. A deeper channel floats all boats: The port economy as urban growth engine. Environment and Planning A 474: 783–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, K. 2011. An innovation and engineering maturity model for marine industry networks. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 362 AICT, 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L.-M. 2012. Humanitarian cluster leads: Lessons from 4PLs. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 22: 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen, J.I. 2003. Innovation, capabilities and competitive advantage in Norwegian shipping. Maritime Policy and Management 302: 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J.-C., and H. Zhen. 2013. Research on the maritime cluster competition based on ecological niche theory. Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 13 (6): 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., and W. Percy. 1970. The age of recovery – The fifteenth century. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., M. Johansson, and K. Andersson. 2014. Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: An action research case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 66: 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juchelka, R., and J. Brenienek. 2016. Evaluation of impacts of logistics clusters in the corridor Rotterdam-genoa. Contributions to Economics 207: 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapros, S., and C. Panou. 2007. Chapter 10 coastal shipping and Intermodality in Greece: The weak link. Research in Transportation Economics 21: 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., C. Markmann, and H.A. von der Gracht. 2015. Foresight support systems to facilitate regional innovations: A conceptualization case for a German logistics cluster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 97: 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koliousis, I., P. Koliousis, and S. Papadimitriou. 2013. Estimating the impact of road transport deregulation in short sea shipping: Experience from deregulation in the European Union. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 5 (4–5): 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koliousis, I.G., S. Papadimitriou, E. Riza, P.J. Stavroulakis, and V. Tsioumas. 2017. Strategy, policy, and the formulation of maritime cluster typologies. Marine Policy 86: 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. Scarcity theory and maritime clusters: From paradox to modelling. Marine Policy 93: 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koliousis, I.G., S. Papadimitriou, P.J. Stavroulakis, and V. Tsioumas. 2018b. The management of change within maritime clusters. FME Transactions 46 (3): 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotowska, I. 2015. The role of ferry and Ro-Ro shipping in sustainable development of transport. Review of Economic Perspectives 15 (1): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Method of assessing the role of short sea shipping in sustainable development of transport. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 8 (6): 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, J.R., Y. Chen, and P. Mangiameli. 2013. Estimating demand for container freight service at the port of Davisville. Interfaces 43 (2): 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaksonen, E., and H. Mäkinen. 2013. The competitiveness of the maritime clusters in the Baltic sea region: Key challenges from the Finnish perspective. Journal of East-West Business 19 (1–2): 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le-Griffin, H.D., and M.T. Griffin. 2010. Managing empty container flows through short sea shipping and regional port systems. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 2 (1): 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, K. 2007. When seafaring is or was a calling: Norwegian seafarers’ career experiences. Maritime Policy and Management 344: 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, H., E. Laaksonen, and K. Liuhto. 2014. Energy and maritime clusters in the eastern Baltic sea region: Competitiveness through international inter-cluster cooperation? In Geo-Regional Competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe, the Baltic Countries, and Russia: 184–210. IGI Global, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen, T., T. Inkinen, and J. Saarni. 2013. Innovation types in the Finnish maritime cluster. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 121: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3 (1): 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-López, A., J. Kronbak, and L. Jiang. 2015a. Cost and time models for the evaluation of intermodal chains by using short sea shipping in the North Sea region: The Rosyth-Zeebrugge route. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 7 (4): 494–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-López, A., P.C. Sobrino, and L.C. Santos. 2015b. Definition of optimal fleets for sea motorways: The case of France and Spain on the Atlantic coast. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 7 (1): 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-López, A., P.C. Sobrino, and M.M. González. 2016. Influence of external costs on the optimisation of container fleets by operating under motorways of the sea conditions. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 8 (6): 653–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Md Arof, A. 2015. Determinants for a feasible short sea shipping: Lessons from Europe for ASEAN. Asian Social Science 11 (15): 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, A. 2013. Unaccompanied transport as a strategy for international road hauliers in Ro-Ro short sea shipping. Maritime Economics and Logistics 15 (3): 374–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihaela Bukuaš Skočí, B.U.Š., and N. Jolič. 2010. Functional analysis of republic of Croatia for short sea shipping development. Promet – Traffic – Traffico 22 (1): 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroussi, K. 2008. Employment of seafarers in the EU context: Challenges and opportunities. Marine Policy 326: 1043–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, P.V. 2016. The role of knowledge-intensive service activities on inducing innovation in co-opetition strategies: Lessons from the maritime cluster of the Algarve region. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 151: 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, P., T. de Noronha, and P. Neto. 2013. A differentiation framework for maritime clusters: Comparisons across Europe. Sustainability (Switzerland) 5 (9): 4076–4105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novo-Corti, I., and F. González-Laxe. 2009. Maritime transport and trade: The impact of European transport policy. An overview of maritime freight transport patterns. European Research Studies Journal 12 (1): 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowakowska-Grunt, J., D. Jelonek, and H. Koscielniak. 2014. Logistics’ clusters as a part of regional policy in Poland. In 2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport, ICALT 2014, art. no. 6866313, 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2003. Geographic concentration and territorial disparity in OECD countries. www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/15179757.DOC.

  • Ortega, C., C. Nogueira, and H. Pinto. 2013. Sea and littoral localities’ economy: Exploring potentialities for a maritime cluster – An integrated analysis of Huelva, Spain and Algarve, Portugal. Journal of Maritime Research 102: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özer, D., N. Nikitakos, A.G. Cerit, E.Z. Oral, and E.G. Stratakos. 2005. Analysis of the short sea shipping potential between Turkey and the Greek Islands. 1st International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics 2005, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, A., G. Wang, O. Sánchez, R. Ungo, and E. Tapiero. 2016. The impact of the Panama Canal expansion on Panama’s maritime cluster. Maritime Policy and Management 43 (2): 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paixão Casaca, A.C. 2008. Motorway of the sea port requirements: The viewpoint of port authorities. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 11 (4): 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paixão, A.C., and P.B. Marlow. 2002. Strengths and weaknesses of short sea shipping. Marine Policy 26 (3): 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, H., and A.R. Cruz. 2012. Structuring a knowledge-based maritime cluster: Contributions of network analysis in a tourism region. Revista de Estudios Regionales (95): 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, H., A.R. Cruz, and C. Combe. 2015. Cooperation and the emergence of maritime clusters in the Atlantic: Analysis and implications of innovation and human capital for blue growth. Marine Policy 57: 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14 (1): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prause, G. 2014. Sustainable development of logistics clusters in green transport corridors. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 41: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaraftis, H.N. 2005. EU ports policy: Where do we go from here? Maritime Economics and Logistics 7 (1): 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaraftis, H.N., and C.A. Kontovas. 2011. Ship emissions, costs and their tradeoffs. In Advances in maritime logistics and supply chain systems, 257–295. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Puckett, S.M., D.A. Hensher, M.R. Brooks, and V. Trifts. 2011. Preferences for alternative short sea shipping opportunities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 47 (2): 182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L., Y. Sheffi, and R. Welsch. 2014. Logistics agglomeration in the US. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 59: 222–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L., D. Gligor, and Y. Sheffi. 2016a. The benefits of logistics clustering. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 463: 242–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L., Y. Sheffi, and D. Knoppen. 2016b. Logistics clusters: The impact of further agglomeration, training and firm size on collaboration and value added services. International Journal of Production Economics 179: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F., G. Musolino, and V. Assumma. 2016. Competition between ro-ro and lo-lo services in short sea shipping market: The case of Mediterranean countries. Research in Transportation Business and Management 19: 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, R. 2014. Maritime clusters evolution. The (not so) strange case of the Portuguese maritime cluster. Journal of Maritime Research 11: 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, R., A. Simões, and C. Guedes Soares. 2016. The economic features, internal structure and strategy of the emerging Portuguese maritime cluster. Ocean and Coastal Management 129: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Rodrigues, V., S. Pettit, I. Harris, A. Beresford, M. Piecyk, Z. Yang, and A. Ng. 2015. UK supply chain carbon mitigation strategies using alternative ports and multimodal freight transport operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 78: 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schøyen, H., and S. Bråthen. 2015. Measuring and improving operational energy efficiency in short sea container shipping. Research in Transportation Business and Management 17: 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seoane, M.J.F., F.G. Laxe, and C.P. Montes. 2017. Short sea shipping in the Atlantic Arc: A spatial shift-share approach. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 9 (3): 323–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. 2013. Logistics-intensive clusters: Global competitiveness and regional growth. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 181: 463–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, M. 2010. Maritime cluster of Japan: Implications for the cluster formation policies. Maritime Policy and Management 374: 377–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sornn-Friese, H., and M.J. Lversen. 2014. The establishment of the Danish International Ship Register DIS and its connections to the maritime duster. International Journal of Maritime History 261: 82–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavroulakis, P.J., and S. Papadimitriou. 2016. The strategic factors shaping competitiveness for maritime clusters. Research in Transportation Business and Management 19: 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Situation analysis forecasting: The case of European maritime clusters. Maritime Policy and Management 44 (06): 779–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styhre, L. 2009. Strategies for capacity utilisation in short sea shipping. Maritime Economics and Logistics 11 (4): 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Alemán, A., L. Trujillo, and K.P.B. Cullinane. 2014. Time at ports in short sea shipping: When timing is crucial. Maritime Economics and Logistics 16 (4): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo, L., and B. Tovar. 2007. The European port industry: An analysis of its economic efficiency. Maritime Economics and Logistics 9 (2): 148–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trupac, I. 2008. More competitiveness for Slovenia and its companies through the Slovenian transport logistics cluster. Promet – Traffic – Traffico 201: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzannatos, E.S. 2005. Technical reliability of the Greek coastal passenger fleet. Marine Policy 29 (1): 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Val, S., and N. Blázquez. 2009. Analysis of trans-Pyrenean railway bottlenecks. International Journal of Procurement Management 2 (4): 388–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valadas-Monteiro, P. 2014. General insights of the Portuguese maritime economy and particularly of the algarve region: Contributing towards a strategic vision. Journal of Maritime Research 11: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnolst, N., and F.A.J. Waals. 2005. European short sea fleet renewal: Opportunities for shipowners and shipyards. In 1st International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics 2005, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagkas, V.K., and D.V. Lyridis. 2011. A framework for modelling and benchmarking maritime clusters: An application to the maritime cluster of Piraeus. In Advances in maritime logistics and supply chain systems, 131–156. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., and J.S.L. Lam. 2013. Maritime cluster evolution based on symbiosis theory and Lotka-Volterra model. Maritime Policy and Management 402: 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. An empirical analysis of maritime cluster evolution from the port development perspective – Cases of London and Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 105: 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papadimitriou, S., Lyridis, D.V., Koliousis, I.G., Tsioumas, V., Sdoukopoulos, E., Stavroulakis, P.J. (2018). Strategic Planning of Short Sea Shipping Within Maritime Clusters. In: The Dynamics of Short Sea Shipping. Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98044-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98044-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98044-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics