Skip to main content

Role of Materials to Advanced Nuclear Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1617 Accesses

Abstract

Nuclear energy holds the promise to provide vast amounts of reliable baseline electricity at commercially competitive costs with modest environmental impact. However, the future of nuclear energy lies beyond the current generation of light-water reactors. Future reactors will be expected to provide additional improvements in safety, maintain high reliability, use uranium resources more efficiently, and produce lower volumes of less toxic solid wastes. Several advanced reactor concepts are under development to meet these demands. In most cases, these designs translate into higher operating temperatures and longer lifetimes, more corrosive environments, and higher radiation fields in which materials must reliably perform. The safe and economical operation of any nuclear power system relies to a great extent on the success of the fuel and the materials of construction. Materials used for fission and fusion-based nuclear engineering mainly include fuels, materials for fuel cladding, moderators and control rods, first-wall materials, materials for pressure vessels and heat exchangers. During the lifetime of a nuclear power system, the materials are subject to high temperature, corrosive environment, and damage from high-energy particles released during fission. The fuel which provides the power for the reactor has a much shorter life but is subject to the same types of harsh environments. This chapter will review and update nuclear energy reactors and the materials challenges that will determine the feasibility of these advanced concepts and define the long-term future of nuclear power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abram, T., Ion, S.: Generation-IV nuclear power: a review of the state of the science. Energy Policy. 36(12), 4323–4330 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandreanu, B., Sencer, B.H., Thaveeprungsriporn, V., Was, G.S.: The effect of grain boundary character distribution on the high temperature deformation behavior of Ni–16Cr–9Fe alloys. Acta Mater. 51(13), 3831–3848 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T., Busby, J., Meyer, M., Petti, D.: Materials challenges for nuclear systems. Mater. Today. 13(12), 14–23 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M.F., Smidman, M.: Materials for nuclear power systems. http://www.grantadesign.com/download/pdf/nuclear.pdf (2010). Accessed 05 Dec 2016

  • Azevedo, C.R.F.: Selection of fuel cladding material for nuclear fission reactors. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18, 1921–1942 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornschein, B., et al.: Tritium management and safety issues in ITER and DEMO breeding blankets. Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 466–471 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, W.: Status report on fusion research. Nuclear Fusion 45 (10A), International Fusion Research Council (IFRC), IAEA, Vienna (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, W.R.: US generation IV reactor integrated materials technology program. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 38(2006), 591–618 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B.: Pellet-clad interaction (PCI) failures of zirconium alloy fuel cladding–a review. J. Nucl. Mater. 172, 249–292 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeChiaro, L.F., Forsley, L.P.G., Mosier-Boss, P.: Strained layer ferromagnetism in transition metals and its impact upon low energy nuclear reaction. J. Cond. Matter Nucl. Sci. 17, 1–27 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, M., Pons, S.: Calorimetry of the Pd-D2O system: from simplicity via complications to simplicity. Physics Letters A 176(1–2), 118–129 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, Y.: Fuel: the “consumable” in reactors. In: Nuclear fuels. e-den—A Nuclear Energy Division Monograph. Philippe Pradel, Paris. http://www.materials.cea.fr/en/PDF/MonographiesDEN/Nuclear-fuels-CEA-en.pdf (2009). Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  • Guérin, Y., Was, G.S., Zinkle, S.J.: Materials challenges for advanced nuclear energy systems. MRS Bull. 34, 10–19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, C.K.: Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology, pp. 6339–6349. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IFRC: Status report on fusion research. Nuclear Fusion, Volume 45, Number 10A. International Fusion Research Council (IFRC), Vienna (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, M.: Coming back to nuclear energy—A resurgence of interest in new power plants is driving discovery of advanced materials. https://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/87/8734cover.html (2009). Accessed 24 Oct 2017

  • Kim, I., Choi, B.Y., Kang, C.Y., Okuda, T., Maziasz, P., Miyahara, K.: Effect of Ti and W on the mechanical properties and microstructure of 12% Cr base mechanical-alloyed nano-sized ODS ferritic alloys. ISIJ Int. 43, 1640–1646 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klueh, R.L.: Elevated temperature ferritic and martensitic steels and their application to future nuclear reactors. Int. Mater. Rev. 50, 287–310 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leenaers, A., Detavernier, C., Van den Berghe, S.: The effect of silicon on the interaction between metallic uranium and aluminum: a 50 year long diffusion experiment. J. Nucl. Mater. 381, 242–248 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, W., Spinrad, B.I.: Nuclear reactor device. https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-reactor (2017). Accessed 24 Oct 2017

  • Mukherjee, S., Jamnapara, N.I.: Materials research and development opportunities in fusion reactors. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 81(4), 827–839 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murty, K.L., Charit, I.: Structural materials for Gen-IV nuclear reactors: challenges and opportunities. J. Nucl. Mater. 383, 189–195 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murty, K.L., Charit, I.: An introduction to nuclear materials: fundamentals and applications, pp. 1–41. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, R.: Benefits and challenges of the use of high-Z plasma facing materials in fusion devices. AIP Conf. Proc. 1237, 62–77 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Northwood, D.O.: The development and application of zirconium alloys. Mater. Des. 6(2), 58–70 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philipps, V.: Tungsten as material for plasma-facing components in fusion devices. J. Nucl. Mater. 415(1 Supplement), S2–S9 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens, J.R., Nagel, D.J.: The status of low energy nuclear reactions technology. http://www.etcmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/OpenLENRfinal.pdf (2016). Accessed 03 Nov 2017

  • Pioro, I.: Nuclear Power as a Basis for Future Electricity Production in the World: Generation III and IV Reactors. https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/41271.pdf (2013). Accessed 24 Oct 2017

  • Popple, L.A.: The oxidation of magnesium alloys in reactor atmospheres. J. Nucl. Mater. 8, 60–76 (1963)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieth, M., et al.: Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in Europe. J. Nucl. Mater. 432, 482–500 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Prieto, Á., Camacho, A.M., Sebastián, M.A.: Materials selection criteria for nuclear power applications: a decision algorithm. JOM. 68(2), 496–506 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotti, C., et al.: Establishing ITER-grade properties in CuCrZr: The Indian experience. Fusion Sci. Technol. 65, 205–211 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snead, L.L., Zinkle, S.J.: Use of beryllium and beryllium oxide in space reactors. AIP Conf Proc. 746(February 6), 768–775 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storms, E.K.: The explanation of low energy nuclear reaction. Infinite Energy Press, Concord, NH (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Storms, E.: The present status of cold fusion and its expected influence on science and technology. Innov. Ener. Policies. 4(1), 113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-5009.1000113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tancret, F., Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H., MacKay, D.J.C.: Design of a creep-resistant nickel-base superalloy for power plant applications Part I—Mechanical properties modelling. Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 283–290 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vysotskii, V., Kornilova, A.A.: Low-energy nuclear reactions and transmutation of stable and radioactive isotopes in growing biological systems. J. Cond. Matter Nucl. Sci. 4, 146–160 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, B.D., Nordlund, K., Whyte, D.G., Xu, D.: Fusion materials modeling: Challenges and opportunities. MRS Bull. 36, 216–222 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C.P., et al.: Evaluation of the tungsten alloy vaporizing lithium first wall and blanket concept. Fusion Technol. 39, 815–822 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, H.: Failure of type 316 stainless steel cladding during thermal transients. J. Nucl. Mater. 78, 24–32 (1978)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Q.-Z., et al.: Status of R&D on plasma facing materials in China. J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S190–S197 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yurman, D.: TRISO Fuel Drives Global Development of Advanced Reactors. http://www.theenergycollective.com/dan-yurman/2402117/triso-fuel-drives-global-development-advanced-reactors (2017). Accessed 24 Oct 2017

  • Zinkle, S.J., Busby, J.T.: Structural materials for fission & fusion energy. Mater. Today. 12(11), 12–19 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercises

Exercises

10.1.1 Part I: General Questions

  1. 10.1.

    Write the balanced nuclear equation for each of the following:

    1. (a)

      α decay of gold-185.

    2. (b)

      β- decay of actinium-228.

    3. (c)

      proton emission of cobalt-56.

    4. (d)

      β + decay of holmium-158.

  2. 10.2.

    The half-life of 14C is 5730 years.

    1. (a)

      How old is a wooden bowl whose 14C activity is one-fourth of the activity of a contemporary piece of wood?

    2. (b)

      At Stonehenge, a charcoal sample is dug up, presumably the remains of a fire; its 14C activity is 9.65 disintegrations per minute per gram of carbon. Living tissues have a 14C activity of 15.3 disintegrations per minute per gram of carbon. When were the fires of Stonehenge ignited?

  3. 10.3.

    Potassium-40 is often used to date minerals. How old is the rock if two-fifths of the original K-40 exists in it?

  4. 10.4.

    Describe three major environmental and security problems associated with nuclear power.

  5. 10.5.

    Plutonium is very damaging when inhaled as small particles because of the ionization of tissue by its emitted alpha particles. One microgram of plutonium is known to produce cancer in experimental animals. From its atomic weight (239) and half-life (24,360 years), calculate how many alpha particles are emitted by a microgram of plutonium over the course of a year? About how many ionizations do the particles produce?

  6. 10.6.

    A neutron generated by fission typically possesses a kinetic energy of 2 MeV. When such a neutron collides with a hydrogen atom 18 times, its energy is reduced to its thermal energy of 0.025 eV, that is, the kinetic energy it would possess by virtue of the temperature of its surroundings. The same neutron would have to collide with a sodium atom more than 200 times to reduce its energy by the same amount. Explain how these characteristics make water a suitable coolant in the pressurized light-water reactor that utilizes U-235 as the fuel, whereas sodium is the suitable coolant in the breeder reactor.

  7. 10.7.

    Why are the spent fuel rods from fission reactors more radioactive than the initial fuel rods?

  8. 10.8.

    How does a breeder reactor extend the supply of nuclear fuel? What are the problems associated with the breeder design?

  9. 10.9.

    From the standpoint of weapons proliferation, why is it more dangerous to fuel reactors with plutonium than with uranium in which U-235 is enriched to 2–3%?

  10. 10.10.

    Considering the 238U decay scheme, which of the daughters of uranium are likely to be most abundant in uranium-bearing soil, and why?

  11. 10.11.

    Any large-scale nuclear process produces radioactive waste. Compare the problems of waste from uranium fission reactors and from tritium fusion reactors.

  12. 10.12.

    What is the percentage of 235U in naturally occurring uranium and what is the rest made of? A nuclear fission reaction of an 235U atom caused by a neutron produces one barium atom, one Krypton atom, and three more neutrons. Evaluate approximately how much energy is liberated by this reaction.

  13. 10.13.

    Approximately how much percentage of energy is carried by the fission fragments (no calculation necessary for the last part of the question)?

  14. 10.14.

    What is the difference between fissile and fertile isotopes? Give two examples of each. What is the role of fertile isotopes in a breeder reactor?

  15. 10.15.

    Define a nuclear reactor? What is the basic difference between an atomic bomb and a power-producing reactor?

  16. 10.16.

    What are the prime differences between LWR and CANDU reactors (comment mostly on materials aspects)?

  17. 10.17.

    Describe the importance of control materials with respect to reactor safety and control. What are the primary requirements for a control material? Give at least four examples of control materials.

  18. 10.18.

    Categorize neutrons based on their kinetic energy. What is the major difference between a thermal reactor and a fast reactor?

  19. 10.19.

    Zirconium and hafnium both have crystal structures (HCP) in the general operating regimes of LWRs. Naturally occurring Zr always has some Hf (1–3 wt.%) in it. Why are Hf-containing Zr alloys very common in chemical industries but not in nuclear industries? What is the main application of Zr alloys in LWRs? What are the various functions of this reactor component? What are the reasons that make Zr alloys suitable for such use?

  20. 10.20.

    What are the two main zirconium alloys used in light-water reactors? Give their compositions. Name two recently developed zirconium alloys with their compositions.

  21. 10.21.

    What is neutron economy? What significance does it have? How much influence does it exert in the selection of materials used in nuclear reactors?

  22. 10.22.

    Define neutron flux and neutron fluence. What are their units?

  23. 10.23.

    Define neutron cross section? Briefly comment on the importance of neutron cross section from a reactor perspective.

  24. 10.24.

    Neutrons of 10 keV energy are incident on a light-water barrier. The neutron cross section for hydrogen (protium) at 10 keV is about 20 b and that of oxygen is only 3.7 b. Determine the half-value thickness of neutron attenuation for the water barrier (assume that neutron interaction with oxygen in water molecule is negligible). Find out the half-thickness value for 1 MeV neutrons traveling through the water barrier (neutron cross section for protium is 4.1 b for 1 MeV neutrons). Comment on the significance of the results.

10.1.2 Part II: Thought-Provoking Questions

  1. 10.25.

    Address characteristics of advanced nuclear energy. For new Generation IV systems or the extension of current technology, explain why should we be aware of the possibility of new phenomena due to irradiation, corrosion, or aging in both materials and fuels performance.

  2. 10.26.

    List the major differences of fission and fusion reactors, and address their advantages and disadvantages.

  3. 10.27.

    Address materials selection criteria for nuclear power applications, and give some samples to explain.

  4. 10.28.

    Describe materials selected for advanced nuclear fission reactor components. What are the current status and future trends?

  5. 10.29.

    Explain major factors to cause materials degradation in reactor cores.

  6. 10.30.

    What are the major considerations for materials selection in fusion reactors?

  7. 10.31.

    Explain the major steps of nuclear fuel cycles.

  8. 10.32.

    Discuss the potential applications of low-energy nuclear reactions in condensed matter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tong, C. (2019). Role of Materials to Advanced Nuclear Energy. In: Introduction to Materials for Advanced Energy Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98002-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics