Skip to main content

Sharing Colonial Sovereignty? The Anglo-French Experience of the New Hebrides Condominium, 1880s–1930s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
British and French Colonialism in Africa, Asia and the Middle East

Part of the book series: Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies ((CIPCSS))

Abstract

This chapter examines the Franco-British condominium in the New Hebrides archipelago in light of recent works in spatial history and colonial territories. It investigates the modalities of shared sovereignty over common territory, building on the multiple plans for partition promulgated during the condominium. It examines the legal grounds of this rule, the practical distribution of colonial authority, and how attempts at separation drove new ideas of colonial territory and power. This cosovereignty requires rethinking the classic opposition between the British and French colonial empires, taking into account the multiplicity of agents involved, including New Caledonian and Australian intermediaries. This study analyzes bilateral conventions and agreements signed between France and Great Britain between 1878 and 1926, as the two powers ruled as frenemies together. It examines those conventions with regard to local practices, including the various partition plans offered throughout the period by sailors, diplomats, and settler groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mohamed-Gaillard (2011).

  2. 2.

    Bonnemaison (1996 [1986]), Rodman (2001), and Riou (2010).

  3. 3.

    Samson (2003), Thompson (1980), MacClancy (1981), Foucrier (2005), and Bare (1985).

  4. 4.

    Politis (1908), Rannou (2011), and Bresnihan and Woodward (2002).

  5. 5.

    It consists of twelve large islands and many smaller ones, along a volcanic axis extending 1,200 km from latitude 13 to 20 south, and longitude 166 to 169 east. The main island of Espiritu Santo is a little over 4,000 km2.

  6. 6.

    Archives du Ministère des Affaires Etrangères (hereafter MAE), La Courneuve, 186CPCOM5.

  7. 7.

    Due to disease and work-related travel. The population is estimated at 57,000 in 1910 and most probably 50,000 in 1920 (Bonnemaison 1986).

  8. 8.

    Adams (1986), Bonnemaison (1986), and Guiart (1986).

  9. 9.

    Archives nationales d’Outre Mer (hereafter ANOM), Aix-en-Provence, Fm, SG, NHB//1, 25 October 1888, Ministry of the Navy and Colonies to Minister of Foreign Affairs: “What the Ministry of the Navy and Colonies dreads most in this arrangement is that it will in fact lead to a kind of condominium or dual protectorate, which would result in the immediate loss of the advantageous dominant situation won by our colonists in the New Hebrides.”

  10. 10.

    The convention was signed on 20 October 1906 and later modified by the protocol of 6 August 1914, which was in turn ratified on 18 March 1922.

  11. 11.

    Benton (2006).

  12. 12.

    On the matter of land ownership and the plantation economy in the New Hebrides, see Adams (1986), Banner (2007), Guiart (1986), Neilson (1979), and Van Trease (1987).

  13. 13.

    A number of political systems existed on the archipelago. There is evidence of systems of elective or hereditary chiefdoms on the central and southern islands. In northern and certain central islands, there was a system based on a hierarchy of ranks (Bonnemaison 1996). Most European observers did not see—or did not want to acknowledge—this complex sociopolitical organization.

  14. 14.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//1, 16 March 1892, captain of the frigate DAGAUD to the French Consul in Sydney (A1 (2)).

  15. 15.

    Thomson (2000).

  16. 16.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//35 DOMAINE incident on Api island caused by the displaying of a British flag by a native, 18 September 1903.

  17. 17.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//4, Picanon report from 1903.

  18. 18.

    MAE, 186CP/COM/4, 1887: Proposal by commanding officer Bayle, leaving Banks and Torres and the southern islands to the British.

  19. 19.

    MAE, 186CP/COM/4.

  20. 20.

    The New Hebrides was a target of the blackbirding practiced by Australians in the Pacific during the nineteenth century.

  21. 21.

    With the creation of a German and US Samoa, along with the renunciation of Great Britain, which obtained a protectorate over the Salomon Islands (and territories in Africa), a short-lived condominium was established by the Treaty of Berlin in 1889, lasting ten years. The condominium recognized the independence of the Samoan government (Gilson 1970 and Ryden 1975).

  22. 22.

    MAE, 186CP/COM/5, 12 February 1900, letter from Ambassador of France Cambon to London.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    MAE, 186CP/COM/8, note for the minister, 16 June 1908.

  25. 25.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//35 Domaine, Cabinet of the Governor, New Caledonia, Nouméa, 8 August 1905, Partition plan for the archipelago.

  26. 26.

    Verzijl (1970).

  27. 27.

    Protocol of February 1906. Bilingual version. Original text online (http://www.vanuatu.usp.ac.fj/library/Online/Texts/New_Hebrides/archive.htm).

  28. 28.

    Emphasis mine.

  29. 29.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//6 Nouméa, 29 September 1909, Resident Commissioner of France to the NH to the High Commissioner of France to the New Hebrides.

  30. 30.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//6 Nouméa, 29 September 1909, Resident Commissioner of France to the NH to the High Commissioner of France to the New Hebrides.

  31. 31.

    ANOM, Fm, SG, NHB//1.

  32. 32.

    ANOM, Fm, SG; NHB//8, 7 October 1920, from the Minister of Foreign Affairs to the Minister of the Colonies.

  33. 33.

    MAE 38CP/COM/8, 30 April 1925, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  34. 34.

    MAE, 38CP/COM/8, 14 November 1926.

  35. 35.

    Agnew (2009).

  36. 36.

    It has sometimes been argued that as a result of this novel situation, colonial domination in the New Hebrides was rather “soft,” at least for the everyday lives of New Hebridians, who in the end were not greatly affected by this administration that lacked substance: “The condominium left a large de facto sphere of autonomy and liberty to Melanesian society, which could rebuild in accordance with its own conceptions once the devastating shock of initial contact with the external world had passed” (Antheaume and Bonnemaison 1988, 65). The fact remains that the seizure of lands was a reality, whose relation to the problems of economic development encountered by the state of Vanuatu upon its independence cannot be denied.

  37. 37.

    In similar fashion but in a different register, the indigénat system established in the French empire led to a differentiated way of ruling over populations living on the same territory.

  38. 38.

    Darwin (2011).

  39. 39.

    Stoler et al. (2007).

Bibliography

Archival Sources

    Archives du Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, La Courneuve (MAE)

    Archives nationales d’Outre Mer, Aix-en-Provence (hereafter ANOM)

    Printed Sources

    • Adams, Ron. 1986. Indentured Labour and the Development of Plantations in Vanuatu, 1867–1922. Journal de la société des océanistes, 42, nos. 82–83: 41–63.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Agnew, John. 2009. Globalization and Sovereignty. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

      Google Scholar 

    • Aldrich, Robert. 1990. The French Presence in the South Pacific, 1842–1940. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    • Antheaume, Benoît, and Joël Bonnemaison. 1988. Atlas des îles et des Etats du Pacifique Sud. Montpellier: Gip reclus, Paris Publisud.

      Google Scholar 

    • Banner, Stuart. 2007. Possessing the Pacific: Land, Settlers, and Indigenous People from Australia to Alaska. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    • Baré, Jean-François. 1985. Le Malentendu pacifique: Des premières rencontres entre Polynésiens et Anglais et de ce qui s’ensuivit avec les Français jusqu’à nos jours. Paris: Hachette.

      Google Scholar 

    • Benoist, Hubert. 1972. Le Condominium des Nouvelles-Hébrides et la société mélanésienne. Paris: Éditions A. Pedone.

      Google Scholar 

    • Benton, Lauren. 2006. Spatial Histories of Empire. Itinerario 30: 19–34.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Blais, Hélène. 2005. Voyages au Grand Océan. Géographies du Pacifique et colonisation, 1815–1845. Paris: CTHS.

      Google Scholar 

    • Bonnemaison, Joël. 1975. Nouvelles Hébrides. Papeete: Editions du Pacifique.

      Google Scholar 

    • ———. 1986. Passion et misères d’une société coloniale: les plantations au Vanuatu entre 1920 et 1980. Journal de la société des océanistes, 42, nos. 82–83: 65–84.

      Google Scholar 

    • ———. 1996 [1986]. Les fondements géographiques d’une identité. L’archipel du Vanuatu. Essai de géographie culturelle – Livre I: Gens de pirogue et gens de la terre. Paris: ORSTOM éditions.

      Google Scholar 

    • Bresnihan, Brian J., and Keith Woodward. 2002. Tufala Gavman: Reminiscences from the Anglo-French Condominium of New Hebrides. Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies University of South Pacific.

      Google Scholar 

    • Darwin, John. 2011. The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World-System, 1830–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Foucrier, Annick, ed. 2005. The French and the Pacific world, 17th–19th centuries: Explorations, Migrations, and Cultural Exchanges. Burlington: Ashgate.

      Google Scholar 

    • Gilson, Richard Phillip. 1970. Samoa 1830 to 1900: The Politics of a Multi-cultural Community. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Guiart, Jean. 1986. La conquête et le déclin: les plantations, cadre des relations sociales et économiques au Vanuatu. Journal de la société des océanistes, 42, nos. 82–83: 7–40.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • MacClancy, Jeremy. 1981. To Kill a Bird with Two Stones: A Short History of Vanuatu. Port Vila: Imprimerie SOCOM (traduction française, Port-Vila, Centre culturel du Vanuatu, Faire de deux pierres un coup, Une brève histoire du Vanuatu jusqu’à l’indépendance, 2002).

      Google Scholar 

    • Mohamed-Gaillard, Sarah. 2011. Du condominium franco-britannique des Nouvelles-Hébrides au Vanuatu: deux métropoles pour une indépendance. Le Journal de la Société des Océanistes 133: 309–322.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Neilson, David John. 1979. Might or Misery?: British Planters in the New Hebrides 1920–40. Auckland: History, University of Auckland.

      Google Scholar 

    • New Hebrides, British Service. 1921–1972. Colonial Reports, New Hebrides. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.

      Google Scholar 

    • Politis, N. 1908. Le Condominium Franco-Anglais des Nouvelles-Hébrides. Paris: A. Pedone.

      Google Scholar 

    • Rannou, Gwendal. 2011. L’archipel aux deux drapeaux: Le condominium des Nouvelles-Hébrides de 1908 à 1923. Master’s thesis under the direction of Hugues Tertrais, University of Paris I.

      Google Scholar 

    • Riou, Virginie. 2010. Trajectoires pseudo-coloniales: Les Français du condominium franco-anglais des ex Nouvelles-Hébrides (Vanuatu) de la fin du XIXe siècle à l’entre deux guerres. EHESS. Anthropology thesis under direction of Alban Bensa.

      Google Scholar 

    • Rodman, Margaret Critichlow. 2001. Houses Far from Home: British Colonial Space in the New Hebrides. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ryden, George Herbert. 1975. The Foreign Policy of the United States in Relation to Samoa. New York: Octagon Press. (Reprint by Special Arrangement with Yale University Press. Originally Published at New Haven: Yale University Press. 1928).

      Google Scholar 

    • Samson, Jane, ed. 2003. British Imperial Strategies in the Pacific, 1750–1900. Burlington: Ashgate.

      Google Scholar 

    • Stoler, Laura Ann, McGranahan Carole, and Peter C. Perdue, eds. 2007. Imperial Formations. London: James Currey.

      Google Scholar 

    • Thompson, Roger C. 1980. Australian Imperialism in the Pacific: The Expansionist Era, 1820–1920. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Thomson, Anne-Gabrielle. 2000. John Higginson: Spéculateur-aventurier à l’assaut du Pacifique: Nouvelle-Calédonie/Nouvelles-Hébrides. Paris: L’Harmattan.

      Google Scholar 

    • Van Trease, Howard. 1987. The Politics of Land in Vanuatu: From Colony to Independence. Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies of University of the South Pacific.

      Google Scholar 

    • Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem. 1970. International Law in Historical Perspective, Part III, State Territory. Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff..

      Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    Authors

    Editor information

    Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2019 The Author(s)

    About this chapter

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this chapter

    Blais, H. (2019). Sharing Colonial Sovereignty? The Anglo-French Experience of the New Hebrides Condominium, 1880s–1930s. In: Fichter, J.R. (eds) British and French Colonialism in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97964-9_10

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97964-9_10

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

    • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97963-2

    • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97964-9

    • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics