Skip to main content

An Experience with Software Engineering Education Using a Software Process Improvement Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Higher Education for All. From Challenges to Novel Technology-Enhanced Solutions (HEFA 2017)

Abstract

Educational games offer different ways for representing complex themes. However, creating a game that precisely addresses the subject being taught and effectively provides students’ learning and engagement is a complicated task. With this in mind, we researched and created an educational game for improving students’ Software Process Improvement (SPI) knowledge. The aim of this game is to bring practices from the software development industry to the students. In an attempt to provide a better guidance, this work describes the issues and challenges associated with the creation and validation process of a Software Engineering educational game. We adopted an incremental and iterative approach, where each step involves different knowledge, allowing us to point out a set of important aspects that should be taken into account during the development. These aspects can guide new developers and instructors in the design and selection of educational games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this work we refer to educational games also using the term “serious games”.

  2. 2.

    We use the term “components” to refer to the structural elements of FASENG.

  3. 3.

    TikeSwing is a framework for Java Swing development providing high-level MVC architecture.

References

  1. Aasheim, C.L., Li, L., Williams, S.: Knowledge and skills requirements for entry-level information technology workers: a comparison of industry and academia. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 20(3), 349–356 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, W.F., Wu, W.H., Wang, T.L., Su, C.H.: A game-based learning system for software engineering education. In: 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, New York, October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navarro, E.O.: SimSE: a software engineering simulation environment for software process education. Ph.D. thesis, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drappa, A., Ludewig, J.: Simulation in software engineering training. In: 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2000, Limerick, Ireland, 4–11 June 2000, pp. 199–208 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peixoto, D.C., Resende, R.F., Pádua, C.I.P.: The issues of adopting simulation games in software engineering classes. In: 45th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, Texas, pp. 1–8, October 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul. Gaming 33(4), 441–467 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 661–686 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Wilson, A., Razak, A.: A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Comput. Educ. 102, 202–223 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peixoto, D.C.C., Resende, R.F., Pádua, C.I.P.S.: Evaluating software engineering simulation games: the UGALCO framework. In: 44th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 1–9, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calderón, A., Ruiz, M.: A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: an application to software project management. Comput. Educ. 87, 396–422 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyle, E.A., et al.: An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 94, 178–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedwell, W.L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E.: Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning. Simul. Gaming 43(6), 729–760 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caulfield, C., Xia, J.C., Veal, D., Maj, S.P.: A systematic survey of games used for software engineering education. Mod. Appl. Sci. 5(6), 28–43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de A. Souza, M.R., Veado, L., Moreira, R.T., Figueiredo, E., Costa, H.: A systematic mapping study on game-related methods for software engineering education. Inf. Softw. Technol. 95, 201–218 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ye, E., Liu, C., Polack-Wahl, J.: Enhancing software engineering education using teaching aids in 3-D online virtual worlds. In: 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2007, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pp. T1E-8–T1E-13, October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Oliveira Barros, M., Dantas, A.R., Veronese, G.O., Werner, C.M.L.: Model-driven game development experience and model enhancements in software project management education. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11(4), 411–421 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, A., Boehm, B.: SimVBSE: developing a game for value-based software engineering. In: 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Oahu, Hawaii, pp. 103–114, April 2006

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knauss, E., Schneider, K., Stapel, K.: A game for taking requirements engineering more seriously. In: First International Workshop on Multimedia Requirements Engineering, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, pp. 22–26. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, M., Rahim, L.A., Arshad, N.I.: A review of educational games design frameworks: an analysis from software engineering. In: 2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 1–6, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Staalduinen, J.P., de Freitas, S.: A game-based learning framework: linking game design and learning outcomes. In: Learning to Play: Exploring the Future of Education with Video Games, vol. 53, pp. 29–45 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marcos, A., Zagalo, N.: Instantiating the creation process in digital art for serious games design. Entertain. Comput. 2(2), 143–148 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommeregger, P., Kellner, G.: Brief guidelines for educational adventure games creation (EAGC). In: IEEE Fourth International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL), pp. 120–122, March 2012

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kirkley, S.E., Tomblin, S., Kirkley, J.: Instructional design authoring support for the development of serious games and mixed reality training. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Loh, C.S.: Researching and developing serious games as interactive learning instructions. Int. J. Gaming Comput.-Mediat. Simul. (IJGCMS) 1(4), 1–19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Schwarz, D., Albert, D., Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J.L., Bopp, M.: The Elektra project: towards a new learning experience. In: M3 - Interdisciplinary Aspects on Digital Media & Education, pp. 19–48 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Petri, G., von Wangenheim, C.G.: How to evaluate educational games: a systematic literature review. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 22(7), 992–1021 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fernandes, J., Duarte, D., Ribeiro, C., Farinha, C., Pereira, J.M., da Silva, M.M.: iThink: a game-based approach towards improving collaboration and participation in requirement elicitation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 15, 66–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Longstreet, C.S., Cooper, K.: A meta-model for developing simulation games in higher education and professional development training. In: 17th International Conference on Computer Games (CGAMES), pp. 39–44, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kohwalter, T.C., Clua, E.W.G., Murta, L.G.P.: SDM - an educational game for software engineering. In: Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGAMES), pp. 222–231 (Nov 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bollin, A., Hochmuller, E., Mittermeir, R., Samuelis, L.: Experiences with integrating simulation into a software engineering curriculum. In: IEEE 25th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 62–71, April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  31. Monasor, M.J., Vizcaíno, A., Piattini, M.: Providing training in GSD by using a virtual environment. In: Dieste, O., Jedlitschka, A., Juristo, N. (eds.) PROFES 2012. LNCS, vol. 7343, pp. 203–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31063-8_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Galvão, T.A.B., Neto, F.M.M., Bonates, M.F., Campos, M.T.: A serious game for supporting training in risk management through project-based learning. In: Putnik, G.D., Cruz-Cunha, M.M. (eds.) ViNOrg 2011. CCIS, vol. 248, pp. 52–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Stansfield, M., Boyle, E.A.: Evaluation of a game to teach requirements collection and analysis in software engineering at tertiary education level. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 21–35 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kupsch, D.C.C.: SPIAL: a tool for software process improvement training. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. CMMI: CMMI®for development, version 1.3. Technical report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033, Software Engineering Institute (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Peixoto, D.C.C., Batista, V.A., Resende, R.F., Pádua, C.I.P.S.: Learning from students’ mistakes in software engineering courses. In: 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2010, Northern Virginia/Washington, D.C., pp. F1J-1–F1J-6, October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peixoto, D.C.C., Possa, R.M., Resende, R.F., Pádua, C.I.P.S.: FASENG: a framework for development of software engineering simulation games. In: 42nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012, Seattle, Washington, D.C., October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dantas, A.R., Barros, M.O., Werner, C.M.L.: A simulation-based game for project management experiential learning. In: 16th the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. SEKE 2004, Banff, Anbert, Canada, pp. 19–24, June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Souza, C.S., Leitão, C.F., Prates, R.O., Amélia Bim, S., da Silva, E.J.: Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 68, 22–40 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela C. C. Peixoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peixoto, D.C.C., Resende, R.F., Pádua, C.I.P.S. (2018). An Experience with Software Engineering Education Using a Software Process Improvement Game. In: Cristea, A., Bittencourt, I., Lima, F. (eds) Higher Education for All. From Challenges to Novel Technology-Enhanced Solutions. HEFA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97933-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97934-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics