Skip to main content

Data Federation in the Era of Digital, Consumer-Centric Cares and Empowered Citizens

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Well-Being in the Information Society. Fighting Inequalities (WIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 907))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

Breast cancers, similar to any other types of cancers or diseases, need treatments and other actions that generate medical and patient data. As the owner of the data about him-/herself, a patient has the right to get and inspect all basic, treatment and other data recorded about her/him. However, this data is typically in the form of inconsistent data entries, such as medical reports, x-ray and other images, blood test admission notes and results, medication history and diagnoses, and is provided to the patient “as is”. The structure, format and meanings of these data entries differ enormously. Thus, when a patient is given access to all data stored about her/him, (s)he usually lacks capabilities and tools to handle the data, and to use the data for her/his benefit. Still, patients are expected to be able to act on the basis of the data available to them, for example, to make appointments or to bring laboratory test results with them. In a previous study, we made the data of similarly different medical and patient ISs interoperable to the cancer specialists of breast cancer cases by using shared attributes as the linkage between data storages. In this conceptual article, we apply our federative approach to contemplate from the patient’s point of view, how data available to a patient could be made interoperable. We explain the theoretical background of the federative approach and related tools within the mentioned breast cancer case and in general. We then describe how the federative approach could be used in the context of digitalized citizen/patient services, empowered citizens and patient/citizen-centric care. With this article we contribute to research by developing the federative approach further and by explaining how (medical and patient) data can be made interoperable to patients/citizens. Our results suggest means to support citizens and digitalized healthcare service intermediaries as well as patient empowerment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Finnish Cancer Registry. https://cancerregistry.fi/statistics/cancer-statistics/

  2. Nykänen, P., Seppälä, A.: Collaborative approach for sustainable citizen-centered health care. In: Wickramasinghe, N., Bali, R.K., Sumoi, R., Kirin, S. (eds.) Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable E-health Solutions. HDIA, pp. 115–134. Springer, Boston (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1536-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Pratt, W.: Personal health information management. Commun. ACM 49(1), 51–55 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, P.C.: The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff. 24(5), 1290–1295 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Detmer, D., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., Tang, P.: Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 8(1), 45 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bos, L., Marsh, A., Carroll, D., Gupta, S., Rees, M.: Patient 2.0 empowerment. In: SWWS, pp. 164–168(2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Archer, N., Fevrier-Thomas, U., Lokker, C., McKibbon, K.A., Straus, S.E.: Personal health records: a scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(4), 515–522 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahlberg, T., Nokkala, T.: A framework for the corporate governance of data - theoretical background and empirical evidence. Bus. Manag. Educ. 13(1), 25–45 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlberg, T., Nokkala, T., Heikkilä, J., Heikkilä, M.: Data federation with a governance of data framework artifact as the federation tool: case on clinical breast cancer treatment data. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 292, 31–42 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mosley, M., Brackett, M., Earley, S., Henderson, D.: The DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge: DAMA-DMBOK Guide, 1st edn. Technics Publications, LLC, Bradley Beach (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cleven, A., Wortmann, F.: Uncovering four strategies to approach master data management. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2010, pp. 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dreibelbis, A., Hechler, E., Milman, I., Oberhofer, M., van Run, P., Wolfson, D.: Enterprise Master Data Management: An SOA Approach to Managing Core Information. Pearson Education, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loshin, D.: Master Data Management. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Berson, A., Dubov, L.: Master Data Management and Customer Data Integration for a Global Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wand, Y., Wang, R.: Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun. ACM 39(11), 86–95 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 16(11), 1282–1292 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shay, L.A., Lafata, J.E.: Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med. Decis. Mak. 35(1), 114–131 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, S., Roudsari, A., Raworth, R., Courtney, K.L., MacKay, L.: Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(4), 857–866 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Varshney, U.: Pervasive healthcare and wireless health monitoring. Mob. Netw. Appl. 12(2), 113–127 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Islam, S.R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M.H., Hossain, M., Kwak, K.: The Internet of Things for health care: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 3, 678–708 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Auerbach, S.M.: Should patients have control over their own health care?: Empirical evidence and research issues. Ann. Behav. Med. 22(3), 246–259 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiina Nokkala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nokkala, T., Dahlberg, T. (2018). Data Federation in the Era of Digital, Consumer-Centric Cares and Empowered Citizens. In: Li, H., Pálsdóttir, Á., Trill, R., Suomi, R., Amelina, Y. (eds) Well-Being in the Information Society. Fighting Inequalities. WIS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 907. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97931-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97931-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97930-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97931-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics