Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Agile in Automotive Embedded Development Projects Using Automotive SPICE 3.1

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 896))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automotive SPICE ® represents an assessment model which is used world-wide in mechatronic automotive projects where software is an essential part of the control system. In November 2018 a new version Automotive SPICE 3.1 has been published. This new version comes with an additional Automotive SPICE Guideline 1st Edition 2017 from VDA (available from Jan. 2018) which serves as a guideline to correctly interpret Automotive SPICE® 3.1. This Automotive SPICE Guideline for the interpretation of Automotive SPICE ® 3.1 includes rating rules and rating recommendations for agile projects. This article analyses these new rules and recommendations and illustrates how Automotive SPICE assessors will evaluate agile projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Automotive SPICE version 3.1, SPICE User Group, VDA – QMC, November 2017. www.automotivespice.com

  2. Automotive SPICE – Guidelines, Process Assessment using Automotive SPICE in the development of software-based systems, 1st edn. VDA – German Automotive Association, Berlin, December 2017. ISSN 0943-9412

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001). www.agilemanifesto.org

  4. Drobietz, M., Poth, A.: A new approach: not agile vs. traditional QM but applying the best of both. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 486–494. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. ISO - International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262 Road vehicles Functional Safety Part 1-10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kösling, M., Poth, A.: Agile development offers the chance to establish automated quality procedures. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 495–503. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. SOQRATES: Task Forces Developing Integration of Automotive SPICE, ISO 26262 and SAE J3061. http://soqrates.eurospi.net/

  8. Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C., Riel, A.: Integrating automotive SPICE, functional safety, and cybersecurity concepts: a cybersecurity layer model. Soft. Qual Prof. 18, 13–23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C., Riel, A., et al.: Implementing Functional Safety Standards has an Impact on System and SW Design - Required Knowledge and Competencies (SafEUr), Software Quality Professional (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Messnarz, R., Spork, G., Riel, A., Tichkiewitch, S.: Dynamic learning organisations supporting knowledge creation for competitive and integrated product design. In: Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference – Competitive Design, Cranfield University, 30–31 March 2009, p. 104 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Macher, G., Sporer, H., Brenner, E., Kreiner, C.: Supporting cyber-security based on hardware-software interface definition systems. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 148–159. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Macher, G., Messnarz, R., Kreiner, C., et al.: Integrated safety and security development in the automotive domain. Working Group 17AE-0252/2017-01-1661, SAE International, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Redmill, F.: Understanding the use, misuse and abuse of safety integrity levels. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Southampton, 8–10 February 2000. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Much, A.: Automotive security: challenges, standards and solutions. Soft. Qual. Prof. 18, 4–12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Messnarz, R., et al.: Integrating functional safety, automotive SPICE and six sigma – the AQUA knowledge base and integration examples. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 285–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreiner, C., et al.: Automotive knowledge alliance AQUA – integrating automotive SPICE, six sigma, and functional safety. In: McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2013. CCIS, vol. 364, pp. 333–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Poth, A., Sasabe, S., Mas, A.: Lean and agile software process improvement - an overview and outlook. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 471–485. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Poth, A., Wolf, F.: Agile procedures of an automotive OEM – views from different business areas. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 513–522. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Siqueira, A.A., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: Using a statistical method to compare agile and waterfall processes performance. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 523–532. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Stelzmann, E., Kreiner, C., Spork, G., Messnarz, R., Koenig, F.: Agility meets systems engineering: a catalogue of success factors from industry practice. In: Riel, A., O’Connor, R., Tichkiewitch, S., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2010. CCIS, vol. 99, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15666-3_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Stelzmann, E.S., Spork, G., Kreiner, C.J., Messnarz, R., König, F.: Practical use of agile methods within systems engineering. International Spice Days, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riel, A., O’Connor, R., Tichkiewitch, S., Messnarz, R. (eds.): EuroSPI 2010. CCIS, vol. 99. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15666-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R.: Software Process Improvement. LNCS, vol. 4257. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11908562

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.): EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Abrahamsson, P., Baddoo, N., Margaria, T., Messnarz, R. (eds.): EuroSPI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4764. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75381-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Riel, A., et al.: EU project SafEUr – competence requirements for functional safety managers. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 253–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Wuest, T., Schmidt, T., WeiDavid, W., Romero, D.: Towards (pro-)active intelligent products. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 11, 154–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korsaa, M., et al.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J. Soft.: Evol. Process 24(5), 525–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Korsaa, M., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Soft.: Evol. Process 25(4), 381–391 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Messnarz, R., Sicilia, M.A., Biro, M.: Social responsibility aspects supporting the success of SPI. J. Soft.: Evol. Process 26(3), 284–294 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to iNTACS (www.intacs.info) and VDA for the development of the Automotive SPICE ® 3.1 and the Automotive SPICE Guideline as a guideline to interpret the assessment model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISCN GesmbH, Graz, Austria

    Richard Messnarz & Damjan Ekert

  2. Methodpark AG, Erlangen, Germany

    Bernhard Sechser, Holger Höhn & Volker Lehmann

Authors
  1. Richard Messnarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard Sechser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Holger Höhn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Volker Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Damjan Ekert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Messnarz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tecnalia Bizkaia, San Sebastián, Spain

    Xabier Larrucea

  2. Tecnalia Bizkaia, San Sebastián, Spain

    Izaskun Santamaria

  3. School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Rory V. O'Connor

  4. I.S.C.N. GesmbH, Graz, Austria

    Richard Messnarz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Messnarz, R., Sechser, B., Höhn, H., Lehmann, V., Ekert, D. (2018). Assessing Agile in Automotive Embedded Development Projects Using Automotive SPICE 3.1. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 896. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97924-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97925-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation