Abstract
Recently vehicle control system becomes have the automated feature. In this situation, the analysis based on malfunction of a system is not enough. We have to consider other hazard types such as the hazard originated from threats, the hazard that comes from the misinterpretation on using sensor. In this paper, we provide several hazard types that we have to think and explain the consistent approach to analyse the system in the concept phase.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The issue shown in this example is categorized in the last one of Table 1 (i.e. “decision of ADS”).
- 2.
We use the pointing system to refer a description: P-CH.SC.CL, where P is the part number, CH is a chapter number, SC is a section number and CL is a clause number of ISO 26262.
- 3.
We use the SAE J3061 to analyse threats, and we think ISA/IEC 62443 is useful to find the safety relating threats.
References
SAE: J3016: SAE international taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Levels of driving automation (2016)
SAE Vehicle Electrical System Security Committee, et al.: SAE J3061-Cybersecurity Guidebook for Cyber-Physical Automotive Systems. SAE-Society of Automotive Engineers (2016)
Knapp, A., et al.: Code of practice for the design and evaluation of ADAS. Preventive and active safety applications, eSafety for road and air transport, European Commission Project (2009)
DOT, HS 810 905: Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS): Human Factors and Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) Summary Report (2008)
ISO, ISO26262: Road vehicles-functional safety. International Standard ISO (2011)
Yoshida, J.: Tesla’s Fatal Crash: 6 Unanswered Questions:1. What did the front-camera actually see just before the crash?. https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330060&page_number=2. Accessed 1 Apr 2018
Spanfelner, B., et al.: Challenges in applying the ISO 26262 for driver assistance systems. Tagung Fahrerassistenz (2012)
Wilhelm, U., Ebel, S., Weitzel, A.: Functional safety of driver assistance systems and ISO 26262. In: Handbook of Driver Assistance Systems: Basic Information, Components and Systems for Active Safety and Comfort, pp. 109–131 (2016)
Ito, M.: Finding threats with hazards in the concept phase of product development. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 277–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_25
Weilkiens, T.: Systems Engineering with SysML/UML: Modeling, Analysis, Design. Elsevier, New York City (2011)
D’Souza, D.F., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1998)
van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements engineering: from system goals to UML models to software. Wiley, Chichester (2009)
IEC, B.S. 61882:2001: Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies). Application guide. British Standards Institute (2001)
Ito, M.: HMI requirements creation, as the collaboration work of human and machine in the safety-critical system. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 61–71. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_5
Ito, M.: Cardion.spec: an approach to improve the requirements specification written in the natural language through the formal method. In: Kreiner, C., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2016. CCIS, vol. 633, pp. 58–69. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44817-6_5
IEC, IEC 62443-1-1: Security for industrial automation and control systems (2007)
Salay, R., Queiroz, R., Czarnecki, K.: An analysis of ISO 26262: machine learning and safety in automotive software, SAE Technical Paper (2018)
ISO, ISO/AWI PAS 21448: Road vehicles - safety of the intended functionality (under development)
AMASS (Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems), Standardization Survey D8.9 (2017)
Kelly, T.: Arguing safety-a systematic approach to managing safety cases. University of York, Department of Computer Science-Publications-YCST (1999)
Larrucea, X., Walker, A, Colomo-Palacios, R.: Supporting the management of reusable automotive software. In: IEEE Software, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 40–47, May–June (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ito, M. (2018). Method of Evaluating the Influence Factor of Safety in the Automated Driving System: The Chasm Between SAE Level 2 and Level 3. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 896. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97924-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97925-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)