Abstract
Prodi explains semiosic phenomena by means of the model of the circle. This model allows to account for a very important feature of the natural world: in life phenomena, there is no a one-way causal arrow, from the lenvironment to the living organism and vice versa. According to Prodi in the lifeworld, there is a two-way relation between cause and effect; the genotype causes the phenotype, but the latter in turn modifies the evolutionary environment, thus ultimately applying an indirect causal pressure back on the genome itself. In this way, it is possible to account for the dynamism of the world of life. The biological world, the world of semiosis, is not closed off, but it continuously expands and develops. The circle of life is best conceived as a spiral. The transition from the circle to the spiral is necessary in order to account—in a biological register—in particular for the evolution and the mutation of human language and culture.
The evolution of language coincides with the evolution of consciousness , which is in its very nature linguistic. The broadening of the field of inquiry is also a broadening of language.
(Prodi 1974: 226)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
BibliographyIn ItalianOther Works Cited
Alač, M., & Violi, P. (Eds.). (2004). In the beginning: Origins of semiosis, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies 12. Bologna: Brepols.
Barbieri, M. (1985). La teoria semantica dell’evoluzione. (Thom, René, preface.) (Saggi, Scienze.) Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Barbieri, M. (2000). I codici organici: La nascita della biologia semantica. (Capire la vita 1.) Ancona: peQuod editore.
Bardini, T. (2017). Relational ontology, Simondon, and the hope for a third culture inside biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(1), 131–137.
Cimatti, F. (2000a). Nel segno del cerchio: L’ontologia semiotica di Giorgio Prodi. Roma: Il manifesto Libri.
Cimatti, F. (2000b). The circular semiosis of Giorgio Prodi. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 351–379.
Prodi, G. (1983). Linguistica e biologia. In C. Segre (Ed.), Intorno alla linguistica (pp. 172–202). Milano: Feltrinelli (Discussione su “Linguistica e biologia”, 308–319).
Sercarz, E. E., Celada, F., Michison, N. A., & Tada, T. (Eds.). (1988). The semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system: Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on the semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system held at Il Ciocco, Lucca, Italy, September 9–12, 1986, Nato ASI Series 23. Berlin: Springer.
von Uexküll, J. (1928). Theoretische Biologie (2nd ed.). Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.
Prodi, G. (1988a). Material bases of signification. Semiotica, 69(3–4), 191–241.
Prodi, G. (1989b). Biology as natural semiotics. In W. Koch (Ed.), For a semiotics of emotion (pp. 93–110). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Barrow, J., & Tipler, F. (1988). The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fadda, E. (2013). Peirce. Roma: Carocci.
Frege, G. (1984). Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cimatti, F. (2018). Breaking the Circle. In: A Biosemiotic Ontology . Biosemiotics, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97902-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97903-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)