Skip to main content

Waste Policies and Individual Behaviours

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Household Waste Management

Abstract

This chapter investigates waste policies that may affect individuals’ behaviour towards waste minimization and recycling. Both market base mechanisms, as unit-based pricing for unsorted waste, and technical policies, as adoption of curbside or drop-off systems are considered. The strength and weakness of each mechanism as drivers of people’s waste-related behaviours are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following Dahlén et al. (2007) regarding the phrase waste sorting, we intend household activities towards the separate disposal of waste materials .

  2. 2.

    An accurate review of existing empirical studies that explore the impacts of unit pricing and curbside recycling policies on household recycling efforts is reported in Jenkins et al. (2003).

  3. 3.

    In Italy , there are approximately 8000 municipalities as of 2017.

  4. 4.

    ‘Drop-off recycling is a recycling program where designated sites are established to collect a range of recyclables and usually recyclers themselves are required to deposit the sorted recyclables in specially marked containers’ (Sidique et al. 2010, p. 163).

  5. 5.

    Chapter 3, pp. 41–47.

  6. 6.

    See page 73.

References

  • Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O’Shea, L. (2011). Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2214–2223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O’Shea, L. (2013). Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited. Ecological Economics, 90, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando, A. W., & Gosselin, A. Y. (2005). Recycling in multifamily dwellings: Does convenience matter? Economic Inquiry, 43(2), 426–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, T. K., Berck, P., & Shimshack, J. P. (2007). Curbside recycling in the presence of alternatives. Economic Inquiry, 45(4), 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortoleto, A. P. (2015). Waste prevention policy and behaviour. New approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, L., Vukicevic, S., Meijer, J. E., & Lagerkvist, A. (2007). Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden. Waste Management, 27(10), 1298–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2009). Household waste prevention evidence review: L3m3-3(D)—Impact of household waste prevention interventions and campaigns. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2013). Waste prevention program for England, household waste prevention in action—Example from across England. London: DEFRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015). Country factsheet for South Italy. Support to member states in improving waste management based on assessment of member states’ performance. Study conducted by Bipro, in cooperation with the Copenhagen Resource Institute. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/pdf/IT_SOUTH_factsheet_FINAL.pdf.

  • Fasolo, B., McClelland, G. H., & Todd, P. M. (2007). Escaping the tyranny of choice: When fewer attributes make choice easier. Marketing Theory, 7(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, I., & Missios, P. (2005). Recycling and waste diversion effectiveness: Evidence from Canada. Environmental & Resource Economics, 30(2), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folz, D. H. (1999). Municipal recycling performance: A public sector environmental success story. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 336–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., & Kinnaman, T. C. (1996). Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. American Economic Review, 86(4), 971–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, R. J., & Oskamp, S. (1994). Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environment and Behavior, 26(5), 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (1994). Willingness to pay for public goods: A test of the contribution model. Psychological Science, 5(6), 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. (1999). The effects of unit pricing system upon household solid waste management: The Korean experience. Journal of Environmental Management, 57(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Adams, R. M., & Love, H. A. (1993). An economic analysis of household recycling of solid wastes: The case of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(2), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(1), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. R., Martinez, S. A., Palmer, K., & Podolsky, M. J. (2003). The determinants of household recycling: A material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 294–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullerton, D. (2000). Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipperberg, G. (2007). A comparison of household recycling behaviors in Norway and the United States. Environmental & Resource Economics, 36(2), 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirakozian, A. (2016). The determinants of household recycling: Social influence, public policies and environmental preferences. Applied Economics, 48(16), 1481–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A. W., Merrild, H., Møller, J., & Christensen, T. H. (2010). Waste collection systems for recyclables: An environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark). Waste Management, 30(5), 744–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse, V., Bhamre, T., & Trimingham, R. (2007). WR0113: Refillable packaging systems: Key methods and processes, WRT151: Objective 6.2, 1–31, DEFRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrs, R. G. (1991). Changing garbage disposal patterns of consumers: Motivation, ability, and performance. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschovsky, J. D., & Stone, S. E. (1994). Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(1), 120–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saphores, J. D. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2006). Household willingness to recycle electronic waste an application to California. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidique, S. F., Lupi, F., & Joshi, S. V. (2010). The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(3), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D., & Spiers, D. (2003). Attitudes and behavioural change in household waste management behaviour. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(12), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, R. L., & Klein, N. M. (2002). Packaging as brand communication: Effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(4), 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRAP. (2007). Understanding food waste—Research summary. Available at http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Household_food_and_drink_waste_in_the_UK_-_report.pdf, March 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianna Gilli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gilli, M., Mancinelli, S., Nicolli, F. (2018). Waste Policies and Individual Behaviours. In: Household Waste Management. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97810-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics