Abstract
In the past few decades the patent environment has grown increasingly opaque and uncertain, to a point where entrepreneurs face a real risk that their products may infringe existing patents. These conditions constitute a source of anxiety for entrepreneurs and tend to place a chill on product innovation and commercialization. In response, various defensive mechanisms have emerged, which are intended to shield companies from the risk of patent infringement. This chapter discusses several of these mechanisms, including defensive publication, patent pledges and open patent agreements. Their legal basis and strategic considerations are examined from the perspective of potential users who are unlikely to build a defensive patent portfolio of their own: start-up entrepreneurs and open innovation communities. While use of these instruments does not achieve full immunity from patent infringement, users may gain freedom to operate for specific products, and thus reduce or even eliminate the risk of patent infringement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
For more information, see www.defensivepublications.org/defensive-pubs-faqs
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
OIN FAQ “Patent troll” activities continue to be a hot topic. What is Open Invention Network doing about that?” (http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/press-room/faqs/)
- 8.
see also http://www.linuxdefenders.org/ and www.defensivepublications.org providing guidance on defensive patent strategies
- 9.
OIN FAQ “What is Open Invention Network” (http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/press-room/faqs/)
References
35 United States Code 2016 (US).
Ackerman, J. R. (2009). Toward open source hardware. University of Dayton Law Review, 34(2), 183.
American University Washington College of Law, Program for Information Justice and Intellectual Property (PIJIP). Non-SDO Patent Statements and Commitments. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.pijip.org/non-sdo-patent-commitments/
Apache License version 2.0. (2004). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Arthur, C. (2011). Nortel patents sold for $4.5bn. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/jul/01/nortel-patents-sold-apple-sony-microsoft
Baio, A. (2012). A patent lie – How Yahoo weaponized my work. Wired Magazine. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.wired.com/business/2012/03/opinion-baio-yahoo-patent-lie
Benkler, Y. (2017). Law, innovation, and collaboration in networked economy and society. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 231–250.
Callahan, M. W., & Schultz, J. M. (2015). Is patent reform via private ordering anticompetitive? In J. L. Contreras & M. Jacob (Eds.), Patent pledges: Global perspective on patent law’s private ordering frontier (pp. 151–152). New York: Edward Elgar. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.pijip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Jason-Schultz-Matthew-Callahan-Patent-Reform-Private-Ordering-Anticompetitive.-Patent-Pledges-2015.pdf
Chien, C. (2014). Startups and Patent Trolls. 17 Stan. Tech. L.R. 461.
Chien, C. (2015). Exclusionary and diffusionary levers in patent law. Santa Clara Law, Faculty Publications. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/882
Contreras, J. L. (2015). Patent Pledges. Arizona State Law Journal, 47, 543–557.
Contreras, J. L. (2017). A patent pledge taxonomy. In J. L. Contreras & M. Jacob (Eds.), Patent pledges: Global perspective on patent law’s private ordering frontier. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Defensive Patent License, version 1.1. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://defensivepatentlicense.org/license
European Patent Convention 2016 (EU).
Global-Tech Appliances Inc. v. SEB S.A. 563 U.S. 754 (2011).
GNU General Public License, Version 3. (2007). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Greenbaum, E. (2013). Three dimensional printing and open source hardware. NYU Journal of IP and Entertainment Law, 2, 257.
Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office 2017 (EU). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/guidelines.html
Hardy, Q. (2011). Google buys Motorola for patent parts. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/quentinhardy/2011/08/15/google-buys-motorola-for-patent-parts/#72db85422fff
Hayes, D. L., & Schulman, C. E. (2013). A response to a proposal for a defensive patent license (DPL). Last revised 27 July 2013. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=2054314
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Repeat-O-Type Stencil Mfg. Corp. Inc. 123 F.3d 1445, 1451 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
Integrated Global Concepts Inc. v. J2 Global Inc. No. C-12-03434-RMW (N.D. Cal. June 28, 2013). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/5:2012cv03434/256710/52
Katz, A. (2012). Towards a functional licence for open hardware. International Free and Open Source Software Law Review. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/69/131
Lemley, M. A., & Shapiro C. (2005). Probabilistic patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 75. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://law.stanford.edu/publications/probabilistic-patents/
Li, Z., Ramos, J. D., Seering, W., & Wallace D. R. (2017). Why open source, exploring the motivations of using an open model for hardware. Conference paper DETC 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.researchgate.net/publication/316884384
Maracke, C., & Metzger, A. (2016). Playing nice with patents: Do voluntary non-aggression pledges provide a sound basis for innovation? North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 17(3), 483.
Marrali, M. (2014). Filling the gap: Evaluating which legal mechanisms effectively protect freedom and openness in hardware. University of Groningen Digital Archive, p. 81. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=134977
Motives for Writing Free Software. GNU Operating Sys. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fs-motives.en.html
Musk, E. (2014). All our patents belong to you. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://www.tesla.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you
OIN License Agreement. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/joining-oin/oin-license-agreement/
OIN Mission Statement. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/about-us/
Parloff, R. (2015). Amid the patent wars, an oasis of calm collaboration. Fortune. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://fortune.com/2015/10/06/open-invention-network-anniversary/
Patent Act 1980 (GE).
Pearce, J. M. (2017). Emerging business models for open source hardware. Michigan Technological University. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/materials_fp/67/
Schultz, J., & Urban, J. (2012). Protecting open innovation: The defensive patent license as a new approach to patent threats, transaction costs, and tactical disarmament. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 26(1), 24.
Shapiro, C. (2001). Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. In A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy. MIT Press, Cambridge. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.nber.org/chapters/c10778
Steveire. (2014). Defensive Patent Publication for Qt. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.kdab.com/defensive-patent-publication-qt-type-erased-iteration/
TAPR Open Hardware License. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from www.tapr.org/ohl.html
USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedures (MPEP) 2015 (US). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/index.html
Vetter, G. R. (2009). Commercial free and open source software: Knowledge production, hybrid appropriability, and patents. Fordham Law Review, 77, 2087. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4435&context=flr
Wang Labs. v. Mitsubishi Elecs. Am. 103 F.3d 1571, 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
What is Copyleft? GNU Operating Sys. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html
What is Open Invention Network. OIN FAQ. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/press-room/faqs/
What is Open Invention Network doing about that? OIN FAQ. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/press-room/faqs/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beldiman, D., Fluechter, F. (2019). Navigating Patents in an Open Hardware Environment. In: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J.P. (eds) Co-Creation. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97787-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97788-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)