Abstract
Open source hardware is an upcoming phenomenon which bears an enormous potential for reframing the social organization of product development and therewith to disrupt conventional industrial practices. The open source movement has not just contributed greatly to the advancement of the internet, renowned open source software projects like the Apache project or Linux project have been accelerated tremendously through company participation while retaining their community structures. This article therefore raises awareness on commonly shared values in the open source hardware (OSH) domain and how to go about managing company participation in open source hardware communities. It addresses some of the most salient aspects of switching from a proprietary logic to an open source paradigm and gives practical advice towards this transition. Therefore, comparisons between the proprietary and the open source logic are drawn along seven themes: co-designing vs. open source product development, global vs. local sourcing, exclusivity vs. reciprocity, mass vs. niche focus, hierarchical vs. self-governed workflows, control vs. self-propelled learning, and company vs. community IT infrastructure. This leads to the identification of practical recommendations for companies interested to engage in open source hardware communities. This guidance will help managers to better navigate their companies within community environments, to identify the kind of contributions they can offer, and ultimately to realize the full potential of synergy advantages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See Carillo and Okoli (2008) for an overview.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
OSH licensing includes the commercial use of OSH products. A non-commercial license (e.g. Creative Commons’ non-commercial license) would in fact not be in line with the definition of OSH (see above).
- 5.
The term dates back to Utterback and Abernathy (1975).
- 6.
See Lee and Cole (2003) for how learning through criticism is an inherent part of the culture within the Linux kernel development project.
References
Abhari, K., Davidson, E., & Xiao, B. S. (2016). Taking open innovation to the next level: A conceptual model of social product development (SPD). In: AMCIS 2016 Proceedings.
Ahlemann, F., Teuteberg, F., & Vogelsang, K. (2009). Project management standards–diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 292–303.
Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2010). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 576–656.
Balka, K., Raasch, C., & Herstatt, C. (2010). How open is open source? – Software and beyond. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 248–256.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99–120.
Boisseau, É., Omhover, J. F., & Bouchard, C. (2018). Open design: A state of the art review. Design Science, 4.
Bonvoisin, J., & Boujut, J. F. (2015, July). Open design platforms for open source product development: Current state and requirements. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on engineering design (ICED 15), 8—Innovation and Creativity, pp. 11–22. Milan, Italy.
Bonvoisin, J., & Schmidt, K. C. (2017). Best practices of open source mechanical hardware – A guide with practical advice for sharing product-related documentation – Version 1.0.
Bonvoisin, J., Mies, R., Boujut, J.-F., & Stark, R. (2017). What is the source of open source hardware? Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1), 5.
Brandon-Jones, E., Dutordoir, M., Neto, J. Q. F., & Squire, B. (2017). The impact of reshoring decisions on shareholder wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 49, 31–36.
Carillo, K., & Okoli, C. (2008). The open source movement: A revolution in software development. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 1–9.
Cova, B., & Dalli, D. (2009). Working consumers: The next step in marketing theory? Marketing theory, 9(3), 315–339.
Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.
Fjelsted, A. S., Adalsteinsdottir, G., Howard, T. J., & McAloone, T. C. (2012). Open design consulting: How to capitalise on and adapt to open source practices for tangible products. Open Design Consulting. M.Sc. Thesis in Management Engineering Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18.
Gacek, C., & Arief, B. (2004). The many meanings of open source. IEEE Software, 21(1), 34–40.
Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis (p. 272). Chichester: Wiley.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In L. Werin & H. Wijkander (Eds.), Contract economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kahn, K. B., Barczak, G., Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., & Perks, H. (2012). An examination of new product development best practice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 180–192.
Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633–649.
Li, Z., Seering, W., Ramos, J. D., Yang, M., & Wallace, D. R. (2017). Why open source?: Exploring the motivations of using an open model for hardware development. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Piller, F. T., Schubert, P., Koch, M., & Möslein, K. (2005, July 1). Overcoming mass confusion: Collaborative customer co-design in online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), JCMC1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00271.x
Piller, F. T., Vossen, A., & Ihl, C. (2012). From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung, 65(1), 7–27.
Pons, D. (2008). Project management for new product development. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 82–97.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.
Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. (2009). On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39(4), 382–393.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5–18.
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.
West, J., & O’Mahony, S. (2008). The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 145–168.
Ye, Y., & Kishida, K. (2003). Toward an understanding of the motivation Open Source Software developers. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software engineering (pp. 419–429). Portland: IEEE Computer Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mies, R., Bonvoisin, J., Jochem, R. (2019). Harnessing the Synergy Potential of Open Source Hardware Communities. In: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J.P. (eds) Co-Creation. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97787-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97788-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)