Advertisement

The Case of East Germany

  • Michael Fritsch
  • Michael Wyrwich
Chapter
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 40)

Abstract

We investigate how institutional change, specifically, the transition from a socialist system to a western-type market economy, relates to the re-emergence of entrepreneurship in East Germany. This region is particularly well suited for such a study because of the rapid change of the institutional framework and the possibility of using West Germany as a benchmark. It took about 15 years for self-employment levels in East Germany to reach those of West Germany. Despite this catch up, we find a number of peculiarities in East German self-employment and new business formation that appear to be a continuing legacy of the socialist period. There is also a considerable correspondence of the regional levels of entrepreneurship before, during and after the socialist period, suggesting the existence of a long lasting regional entrepreneurship culture that can be regarded as an informal institution. This is in line with the hypothesis that informal institutions change much more slowly than formal institutions.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Self-employment New business formation Transformation East Germany 

References

  1. Almus M, Engel D, Prantl S (2002) Mannheimer Gründungspanels des Zentrums für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW). In: Fritsch M, Grotz R (eds) Das Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland – Darstellung und Vergleich der Datenquellen. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 79–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57495-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audretsch DB, Fritsch M (2002) Growth regimes over space and time. Reg Stud 36:113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauernschuster S, Falck O, Gold R, Heblich S (2012) The shadows of the past: implicit institutions and entrepreneurship. Eur J Polit Econ 28:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Polit Econ 98:893–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker SO, Boeckh K, Hainz C, Woessmann L (2016) The Empire is dead, long live the Empire! Long-run persistence of trust and corruption in the bureaucracy. Econ J 126:40–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bersch J, Gottschalk S, Müller B, Niefert M (2014) The Mannheim Enterprise Panel (MUP) and Firm Statistics for Germany. Mannheim: ZEW (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 14-104).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548385
  7. Beugelsdijk S (2007) Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. J Evol Econ 17:187–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird EJ, Schwarze J, Wagner GG (1994) Wage effects of the move toward free markets in East Germany. Ind Labor Relat Rev 47:390–400.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399404700302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brezinski H (1987) The second economy in the GDR: pragmatism is gaining ground. Stud Comp Communism 20:85–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3592(87)90017-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brezinski H, Fritsch M (1995) Transformation: the shocking German way. Moct-Most 5:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brixy U, Grotz R (2004) Differences of the economic performance of newly founded firms in West- and East Germany. In: Dowling M, Schmude J, zu Knyphausen-Aufsess D (eds) Advances in interdisciplinary European entrepreneurship research. LIT, Muenster, pp 143–152Google Scholar
  12. Burda MC, Hunt J (2001) From re-unification to economic integration: productivity and the labor market in Eastern Germany. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:1–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caliendo M, Kritikos A (2010) Start-ups by the unemployed: characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Bus Econ 35:71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9208-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connelley J (2000) Captive university: the sovietization of East German, Czech, and Polish higher education, 1945–1956. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  15. Freytag A, Thurik R (2007) Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. J Evol Econ 17:117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0044-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritsch M (2004) Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new businesses compared in two growth regimes: East and West Germany. J Evol Econ 14:525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0230-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritsch M, Rusakova A (2012) Self-employment after socialism: Intergenerational links, entrepreneurial values, and human capital. Int J Dev Sci 6:167–175Google Scholar
  18. Fritsch M, Kritikos A, Rusakova A (2012) Who starts a business and who is self-employed in Germany? Jena Economic Research Paper 2012-001, Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2006494
  19. Fritsch M, Bublitz E, Sorgner A, Wyrwich M (2014) How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Bus Econ 43:427–446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9544-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gathmann C (2005) The skill loss of older East Germans after re-unification. Schmollers Jahr 125:7–16Google Scholar
  21. Hall JB, Ludwig U (1995) German unification and the “market adoption” hypothesis. Camb J Econ 19:491–507.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hitchens DMWN, Wagner K, Birnie JE (1993) East German productivity and the transition to the market economy: comparisons with West Germany and Northern Ireland. Avebury, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  23. Hitchens DMWN et al (1995) Competitiveness of industry in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Avebury, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  24. IWH (2010) Ostdeutschlands Transformation seit 1990 im Spiegel wirtschaftlicher und sozialer Indikatoren. 2. aktualisierte und verbesserte Auflage, Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, HalleGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson S, Loveman G (1995) Starting over in Eastern Europe, entrepreneurship and economic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawka R (2007) Regional disparities in the GDR: Do they still matter? In: Lentz S (ed) German annual of spatial research and policy: restructuring Eastern Germany. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–122Google Scholar
  27. Kshetri N (2009) Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies: a typology and institutional contexts for market entrepreneurship. J Int Entrep 7:236–259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-009-0039-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazear EP (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Am Econ Rev 94:208–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lazear EP (2005) Entrepreneurship. J Labor Econ 23:649–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMillan J, Woodruff C (2002) The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. J Econ Perspect 16:153–170.  https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. North DC (1994) Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev 84:359–368Google Scholar
  32. Parker SC (2009a) The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker SC (2009b) Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? J Socio-Econ 38:484–494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pickel A (1992) Radical transitions: the survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  35. Smallbone D, Welter F (2001) The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Bus Econ 16:249–262.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011159216578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smallbone D, Welter F (2009) Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. Routledge, Abingdon.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011159216578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Statistik der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (1990) Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR. Staatsverlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Statistisches Bundesamt (2009) Handbuch zum Mikrozensus-Panel 2001–2004. Statistische Bundesamt, Wiesbaden http://www.gesis.org/download/fileadmin/missy/erhebung/Panel/2001-2004/MZP0104_Handbuch.pdfGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas M (1996) How to become an entrepreneur in East Germany: conditions, steps and effects of the constitution of new entrepreneurs. In: Brezinski H, Fritsch M (eds) The economic impact of new firms in post-socialist countries: bottom up transformation in Eastern Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 227–232Google Scholar
  40. Wagner G, Frick JR, Schupp J (2007) The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP): scope, evolution and enhancements. J Appl Soc Sci Stud 127:139–169Google Scholar
  41. Williamson O (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38:595–613.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wyrwich M (2010) Assessing the role of strategy and “socio-economic heritage” for rapidly growing firms: evidence from Germany. Int J Entrep Ventur 1:245–263.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2010.030976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wyrwich M (2012) Regional entrepreneurial heritage in a socialist and a post-socialist economy. Econ Geogr 88:423–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01166.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wyrwich M (2013) Can socioeconomic heritage produce a lost generation with regard to entrepreneurship? J Bus Ventur 28:667–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wyrwich M (2014) Ready, set, go! Why are some regions entrepreneurial jump-starters? Ann Reg Sci 53:487–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0629-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Fritsch
    • 1
  • Michael Wyrwich
    • 2
  1. 1.Friedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations