Skip to main content

Punishment and Democratic Rights: A Case Study in Non-ideal Penal Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy ((PASEPP))

  • 1813 Accesses

Abstract

In the United States, convicted offenders frequently lose the right to vote, at least temporarily. Drawing on the common observation that citizens of color lose democratic rights at disproportionately high rates, this chapter argues that this punishment is problematic in non-ideal societies because of the way in which it diminishes the political power of marginalized groups and threatens to reproduce patterns of domination and subordination, when they occur. This chapter then uses the case of penal disenfranchisement to illustrate how idealized discussions of deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution often ignore the relationship between punishment and social/political power, and thus systematically obscure morally significant aspects of our broader penal practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow (Revised Edition). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Andrew. 2005. Democratic Self-Determination and the Disenfranchisement of Felons. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22(3): 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Regina. 2005. “The Shame of It All”: Stigma and the Political Disenfranchisement of Formerly Convicted and Incarcerated Persons. Columbia Human Rights Review 36: 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, Angela. 2004. Voting—Not Quite a Fundamental Right? A Look at Legal and Legislative Challenges to Felon Disenfranchisement Laws. Minnesota Law Review 89: 231–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, Angela, Christopher Uggen, and Jeff Manza. 2003. Ballot Manipulation and the “Menace of Negro Domination”: Racial Threat and Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850–2002. The American Journal of Sociology 109(3): 559–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Christopher. 2016. Penal Disenfranchisement. Criminal Law and Philosophy 10(3): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, Melanie, and Robert R. Preuhs. 2009. Collateral Consequences of a Collateral Penalty: The Negative Effect of Felon Disenfranchisement Laws on the Political Participation of Nonfelons. Social Science Quarterly 90(3): 722–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Saul, and Nicholas J. Caste. 2003. Granting Suffrage to Felons in Prison. Journal of Social Philosophy 34(2): 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvani, Terry. 1971–72. Homosexuality and the Law—An Overview. New York Law Forum 17: 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, Peter. 2012. Duff on the Legitimacy of Punishment of Socially Deprived Offenders. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6: 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholbi, Michael J. 2002. A Felon’s Right to Vote. Law and Philosophy 21: 543–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Roger. 2001. Who Should Vote? Texas Review of Law & Politics 6: 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Roger, George T. Conway, III, and Kenneth K. Lee. 2008. The Case Against Felon Voting. University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy 2(1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Angela. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deign, John. 1988. On Rights and Responsibilities. Law and Philosophy 7(2): 147–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. 1998. Law, Language, and Community: Some Preconditions of Criminal Liability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18(2): 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. 2001. Punishment, Communication, and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A. 2013. Legal Punishment. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/legal-punishment/.

  • Dugree-Pearson, Tanya. 2002. Disenfranchisement—A Race Neutral Punishment for Felony Offenders or a Way to Diminish the Minority Vote? Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 23: 359–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1999. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, Alec C. 2002. “Civil Death”: The Ideological Paradox of Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review 5(5): 1045–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, Alec C., and Brandon Rottinghaus (eds.). 2009. Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, Claire. 2002. Death and Retribution. Criminal Justice Ethics 21(2): 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, George P. 1999. Disenfranchisement as Punishment: Reflection on the Racial Uses of Infamia. UCLA Law Review 46: 1895–1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Miranda. 1988. Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, Richard. Can’t Buy a Thrill: Substantive Due Process, Equal Protection, and Criminalizing Sex Toys. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100: 101–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Lewis R. 2005. Philosophical Anthropology, Race, and the Political Economy of Disenfranchisement. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 36: 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Alice E. 1994. Ex-Felon Disenfranchisement and Its Influence on the Black Vote: The Need for a Second Look. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 1145–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, Pippa. 2009. “A Chicken-Stealer Shall Lose His Vote”: Disenfranchisement for Larceny in the South, 1874–1890. The Journal of Southern History 75(4): 931–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holroyd, Jules. 2010. Punishment and Justice. Social Theory and Practice 36(1): 78–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, Crime, and the Law. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinig, John, and Kevin Murtagh. 2005. Disenfranchising Felons. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22(3): 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, Hugh. 2005. Collateral Consequences of Punishment: Civil Penalties Accompanying Formal Punishment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22(3): 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Amy E., and Vesla M. Weaver. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, Danielle J. 2006. Pathology Full Circle: A History of Anti-vibrator Legislation in the United States. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 15: 326–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke, Richard L. 2001. The Disenfranchisement of Felons. Law and Philosophy 20: 553–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. 2008. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matravers, Matt. 2006. “Who’s Still Standing?” A Comment on Antony Duff’s Preconditions of Criminal Liability. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3(3): 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, Marc. 2006. Race to Incarcerate (2nd Edition). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogul, Joey L., Andrea J. Ritchie, and Kay Whitlock. 2011. Queer (In)Justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles W. 2005. “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia 20(3): 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Onora. 1987. Abstraction, Idealization, and Ideology in Ethics. In Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, edited by J. D. G. Evans, 55–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, Mary. 2014. Defensible Disenfranchisement. Iowa Law Review 99: 1725–1744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadros, Victor. 2009. Poverty and Criminal Responsibility. Journal of Value Inquiry 43: 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, Christopher, Angela Behrens, and Jeff Manza. 2005. Criminal Disenfranchisement. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1: 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, Christopher, Ryan Larson, and Sarah Shannon. 2016. 6 Million Lost Voters: State—Level Estimates of Felony Disenfranchisement, 2016. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/6-million-lost-voters-state-level-estimates-felony-disenfranchisement-2016/.

  • Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, and Jeff Manza. 2012. State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. http://sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/fd_State_Level_Estimates_of_Felon_Disen_2010.pdf.

  • Valentini, Laura. 2012. Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass 7(9): 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Haag, Ernest. 1985. Refuting Reiman and Nathanson. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(2): 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 1998. The Right of Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 307–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, Matt. 2017. Felon Disenfranchisement and Democratic Legitimacy. Social Theory and Practice 43(2): 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. 1985. Thinking About Crime (Revised Edition). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank audiences at the UNC-Chapel Hill’s 2015 PPE/Value Theory Workshop, the 2016 Central Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association, and the 2016 meeting of Association for Practical and Professional Ethics. I would also like to thank Joshua Blanchard, Allison Fritz, Jennifer Kling, Clare LaFrance, John Lawless, Tim Loughrist, Garreth McMaster, Chris Melenovsky, Adam Thompson, Preston Werner, Mark White, Matt Whitt, Vida Yao, and anonymous referees for enlightening conversations about some of this paper’s central ideas, or for feedback on previous drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Swartzer, S. (2018). Punishment and Democratic Rights: A Case Study in Non-ideal Penal Theory. In: Gardner, M., Weber, M. (eds) The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics