Skip to main content

Sustainable Peace Through Sustainability Transition as Transformative Science: A Peace Ecology Perspective in the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change, Disasters, Sustainability Transition and Peace in the Anthropocene

Part of the book series: The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ((APESS,volume 25))

Abstract

This essay contributes to a conceptual discussion on the need for bridge-building between the natural and social sciences, among different social science disciplines, and the research programmes in political science focusing on peace, security, development and environment (‘sustainable development’), by introducing the two new linkage concepts of ‘political geo-ecology’ and ‘peace ecology’. It focuses on the policy goal of a ‘sustainable peace’ understood as ‘peace with nature’ in the newly proposed epoch of earth history, the Anthropocene.

The key argument of this chapter is that this goal may be achieved by a process of ‘sustainability transition’ that addresses the economic causes of greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere, in which where concerned individuals, families, local communities, states and nations as well as international governmental organisations and non-governmental bodies and social movements may contribute to the transition.

This text suggests that the goal of a ‘sustainable peace’ may be addressed from a peace ecology perspective that integrates both peace and security studies and ecology or ecological approaches aiming at the realisation of the goal of a ‘sustainable development’. It is argued that this requires a shift from disciplinary and multidisciplinary research methods towards inter- and transdisciplinary approaches by moving towards a ‘transformative science’ aiming at a ‘sustainable peace’ where the needed policy changes and the actors and processes of this change towards sustainability should become a part of the research design and action research process.

This essay touches on the manifold fundamental conceptual, methodological, theoretical and action-oriented research needs of a ‘peace ecology approach’ that aims at contributing to the realisation of a ‘sustainable peace’ as ‘peace with nature’ in the ‘Anthropocene’, where the societal outcomes of the physical effects of global environmental and climate change can be countered and mitigated by policies of adaptation, mitigation and an increase of resilience by the affected people.

From the perspective of a Hobbesian policy approach of ‘business-as-usual,’ but also from traditional scientific worldviews, this goal may appear at present to be utopian and for sceptics, it is not achievable. It requires a fundamental change in the dominant ‘worldview’ of many scientists and of the neoliberal mindset of most policymakers, practitioners, but also of ordinary citizens towards an alternative sustainability approach.

For the natural and social sciences it requires a new ‘scientific revolution towards sustainability’ – similar to what Kuhn (1962) called the ‘Copernican Revolution’ or Schellnhuber (1999) outlined as a ‘Second Copernican Revolution’ – with a new scientific paradigm of a ‘peace ecology’ that still needs to be developed in the future.

This holistic approach of linking different scientific discourses with discussions in the political realm deliberately distances itself from the mainstream of political science contributions with often narrowly focused theoretical discussions that solely appeal to a scientific audience and are hardly noted in societal and political discussions.

Hans Günter Brauch has been a co-convener of IPRA’s Ecology and Peace Commission (2012–2018) and is chairman of Peace Research and European Security Studies (AFES-PRESS) and editor of several English language book series published by Springer Nature; Email: brauch@afes-press.de.

Several colleagues have critically commented on an earlier draft: Úrsula Oswald Spring (Mexico), Francisco Rojas (Chile), Luis Alberto Padilla Menendez (Guatemala), Simon Dalby (Canada), Czeslaw Mesjasz (Poland) and Andrew Collins (UK). Their critical comments and suggestions are reflected in this text but the author did not change the main focus of his argument and tried to make it more transparent. For careful language editing the author is grateful to Ms. Margaret Gamberton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This thinking was influenced by natural scientists on the Anthropocene (Crutzen/Stoermer 2000; Crutzen 2002, 2011, 2015; Clark et al. 2004), by human and physical geographers on geopolitics and geo-ecology (Dalby 2013, 2014, 2015; Huggett 1995), by historians (Braudel 1949, 1969, 1972; Osterhammel 2014; Hobsbawm 1994), by social scientists on sustainability transition (Grin et al. 2010; WBGU 2011), and by transformative research (Schneidewind/Singer-Brodowski 2012, 2014; Schneidewind et al. 2016).

  2. 2.

    See: Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, Working Group on the ‘Anthropocene’, at: http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/workinggroups/anthropocene/; http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/majordivisions/anthropocene/ and the book edited by Waters et al. (2014). See the major stratographic divisions at: http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/majordivisions/.

  3. 3.

    See: “The Anthropocene is here: Scientists” (29 August 2016), at: https://phys.org/news/2016-08-anthropocene-scientists.html (3 April 2018).

  4. 4.

    See at: https://theanthropocene.org/petrifying-earth-process-the-stratigraphic-imprint-of-key-earth-system-parameters-in-the-anthropocene/.

  5. 5.

    The emergence of the Anthropocene concept, its concept history, and concept mapping (Brauch 2008), will be discussed by Brauch (2019).

  6. 6.

    The likelihood of human extinction by wholly natural scenarios is very low but anthropogenic extinction may result from global nuclear annihilation, biological warfare, a pandemic-causing agent, ecological collapse, and global warming (Anthropogenic ecocide).

  7. 7.

    See at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_Paris_Agreement (3 April 2018).

  8. 8.

    Chris Mooney; Brady Dennis: “On climate change, Scott Pruitt causes an uproar—and contradicts the EPA’s own website”, in: Washington Post, 9 March 2017.

  9. 9.

    Steven Mufson: “Rick Perry just denied that humans are the main cause of climate change”, in: Washington Post, 19 June 2017.

  10. 10.

    EPA: “Climate Change”, at: https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climatechange.html (26 August 2017).

  11. 11.

    NASA: “Global Climate Change: A blanket around the Earth”, at: https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/ (26 August 2017).

  12. 12.

    See at: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.fig2.png.

  13. 13.

    See at: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ (3 April 2018); https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2 (3 April 2018).

  14. 14.

    See: Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP: “Trump Administration Rolls Back Climate Change Initiatives”, 23 January 2018; Lexicology, at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ebb4ab65-2664-46aa-abb7-8c9bf597e927.

  15. 15.

    Scott Waldman: “Trump Budget Would Slash Science across Agencies”, in: Scientific American, 13 February 2018.

  16. 16.

    Rebecca Hersher, “Climate Scientists Watch Their Words, Hoping To Stave Off Funding Cuts”, 29 November 2017; at: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/29/564043596/climate-scientists-watch-their-words-hoping-to-stave-off-funding-cuts (3 April 2018).

  17. 17.

    “Macron awards US scientists grants to move to France in defiance of Trump”, in: The Guardian, 11 December 2017; at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/11/macron-awards-grants-to-us-scientists-to-move-to-france-in-defiance-of-trump (3 April 2018).

  18. 18.

    “As America quits, Europe tries to lead on climate change”, in: The Economist, 6 July 2017; at: https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21724834-g20-will-test-whether-world-can-implement-paris-emission-accords-america-quits (3 April 2018).

  19. 19.

    “March for Science”; at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_for_Science (3 April 2018).

  20. 20.

    I am grateful for a critical comment on this reference to Amb. Luis Alberto Padilla Menendez (Guatemala).

  21. 21.

    See Dalby (2016); at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019615618681; Kunnas (2017); “at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019617725538?journalCode=anra (7 April 2018).

  22. 22.

    See the debates at: https://goodanthropocenes.net/definitions-of-a-good-anthropocene/ (7 April 2018); Andrew C. Revkin: “Building a ‘Good’ Anthropocene From the Bottom Up”, 6 October 2016; at: https://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/building-a-good-anthropocene-from-the-bottom-up/ (7 April 2018); “Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene”; at: http://www.futureearth.org/bright-spots-seeds-good-anthropocene (7 April 2018).

  23. 23.

    On EcoSERVICES see at: http://www.futureearth.org/projects/ecoservices and at: http://www.futureearth.org/ecoservices/ (7 April 2018).

  24. 24.

    The Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PES) is directed by Albert Norström at the Stockholm Resilience Centre; see at: albert.norstrom@stockholmresilience.su.se and at: http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-programmes-and-projects/2016-03-09-programme-on-ecosystem-change-and-society-pecs.html (7 April 2018).

  25. 25.

    These changes have been documented in many publications http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/publications/ of the Department of Peace and Conflict Research of Uppsala University and through its Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at: http://ucdp.uu.se/?id=1 and in the “Conflict Barometer” (from 1997 to present) of the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research; at: https://www.hiik.de/en/konfliktbarometer/.

  26. 26.

    IPCC: Fifth Assessment Report (2014); United States Global Change Research Program (2009); Oreskes (2004: 1686).

  27. 27.

    Tim Marcin: “What Has Trump Said About Global Warming? Eight Quotes on Climate Change as He Announces Paris Agreement Decision”, in: Newsweek, 1 June 2017.

  28. 28.

    Michael D. Shear: “Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement”, in: The New York Times, 1 June 2017, Ari Natter: “Donald Trump Notifies UN of Paris Exit While Keeping Option to Return”, in: Time, 5 August 2017.

  29. 29.

    Juliet Eilperin: “The Trump administration just disbanded a federal advisory committee on climate change”, in: Washington Post, 20 August 2017; at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/08/20/the-trump-administration-just-disbanded-a-federal-advisory-committee-on-climate-change/?utm_term=.fe019cabd981.

  30. 30.

    See: Regional Dialogues on Sustaining Peace: Shaping UN Strategies for 2018 and Beyond An Informal Planning/Scoping Discussion at Columbia University Law School; at: https://www.stimson.org/; see: UNGA, UNSC: “Peacebuilding and sustaining peace - Report of the Secretary-General, 18 January 2018, A/72/707–S/2018/43; UNGA High-level Meeting on Sustaining Peace, 24–25 April 2018; at: http://sdg.iisd.org/events/unga-high-level-meeting-on-sustaining-peace/: This meeting will “strengthen the UN’s work on peacebuilding and sustaining peace. As specific objectives, the meeting will reflect on how to: (1) Adjust to the new UN approach to peace with the emphasis on conflict prevention; (2) Strengthen operational and policy coherence within the United Nations system towards peacebuilding and sustaining peace; (3) Increase, restructure and better prioritize funding to United Nations peacebuilding activities; (4) Strengthen partnerships between the UN and key stakeholders in the field; (5) Address the root causes of conflict to sustain peace; (6) Address the role of women and youth in peacebuilding.”

  31. 31.

    See Holzner (1968); Holzner/Marx (1979); Haas (1992). Holzner/Marx (1979) defined them as “knowledge-oriented work communities in which cultural standards and social arrangements interpenetrate around a primary commitment to epistemic criteria in knowledge production and application”. Haas (1992) defined an epistemic community as “a network of professionals with recognised expertise and competence in a particular domain and an authoritative claim to policy relevant knowledge within that domain or issue-area.”

  32. 32.

    See: Williams, Nathan, film, 2008: The Climate Wars: BBC Earth: Episode 2; at: http://freedocumentaries.org/documentary/fightback-bbc-earth-the-climate-wars-episode-2-of-3; Dyer (2011); Welzer (2012); Butler (2017).

  33. 33.

    See: Capstick/Pidgeon (2014); Runciman, David, 2017: “How climate scepticism turned into something more dangerous”, in: The Guardian, 7 July; at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/07/climate-change-denial-scepticism-cynicism-politics (5 April 2018); see for an overview with many scientific references on: “Climate change denial”; at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial (5 April 2018).

  34. 34.

    Plautz, Jason, 2015: “CIA Shuts Down Climate Research Program”, in: The Atlantic, 21 May; at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/05/cia-shuts-down-climate-research-program/452502/ (5 April 2018); Hill, Alice C., 2017: “Trump’s environmental order jeopardizes our national security”, in: The Hill, 28 March; at: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/energy-environment/326221-trumps-climate-change-order-jeopardizes-our-national; Scholl, Ellen; Livingston, David, 2018: “Intelligence Community Continues to See Threat from Climate Change”, 15 February; at: http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/intelligence-community-continues-to-see-threat-from-climate-change (5 April 2018).

  35. 35.

    Peter Thomson: “Building Sustainable Peace for All”; at: http://www.un.org/pga/71/2017/01/20/building-sustainable-peace-for-all/, (20 January 2017).

  36. 36.

    See the schedule and all relevant documents; at: http://www.un.org/pga/71/event-latest/building-sustainable-peace-for-all-synergies-between-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development-and-sustaining-peace/ and a summary by the president of the GA, HR Peter Thomson, 29 March 2017, at: http://www.un.org/pga/71/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2015/08/Summary-of-the-High-level-Dialogue-on-Building-Sustainable-Peace-for-All.pdf.

  37. 37.

    See in the US on the role of Fox News, Breitbart News and the Sinclair Media Group on Climate Change; at: http://www.foxnews.com/category/us/environment/climate-change.html (5 April 2018); http://www.breitbart.com/environment/ (5 April 2018); Graves, Lucia, 2017: “This is Sinclair, ‘the most dangerous US company you’ve never heard of’”, 17 August; at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/17/sinclair-news-media-fox-trump-white-house-circa-breitbart-news (5 April 2018); Ward, Bob, 201x: “President Trump’s fake news about climate change, in: LSE, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment; at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/news/president-trump-fake-news-climate-change/ (5 April 2018).

  38. 38.

    For KSI see for details: http://www.ksinetwork.nl/home.

  39. 39.

    For STRN, see: http://www.transitionsnetwork.org/; selected results are published in: Journal on Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transition; at: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-innovation-and-societal-transitions/.

  40. 40.

    International Social Science Council, 2012: “Transformative Cornerstones of Social Science Research for Global Change” (Paris: ISSC); at: http://www.worldsocialscience.org/documents/transformative-cornerstones.pdf (2 May 2018).

  41. 41.

    See: “Transformations to Sustainability”; at: http://www.worldsocialscience.org/activities/transformations/, and at: https://transformationstosustainability.org/.

  42. 42.

    See: Dougsiyeh, Hibaq, 2017: “Media coverage of the Transformative Knowledge Networks”, 17 May; at: https://transformationstosustainability.org/magazine/transformative-knowledge-networks/ (5 April 2018).

  43. 43.

    See: “Transformative pathways to sustainability: learning across disciplines, contexts and cultures”; at: https://transformationstosustainability.org/research/pathways/.

  44. 44.

    See: “Transformative pathways to sustainability …”, Ibid.

  45. 45.

    See Göpel (2016); at: http://www.afes-press-books.de/html/APESS_02.htm and at: http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319437651.

  46. 46.

    “Definitions”; at: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/trec/about-us/definitions/ (4 February 2016).

  47. 47.

    The theme of the 7th International Sustainability Transition Conference (IST) conference in Wuppertal (Germany) was “Exploring Transition Research as Transformative Science”; at: https://ist2016.org/ and https://transitionsnetwork.org/past-ist-conferences/ (2 May 2018).

  48. 48.

    This paragraph relies on: “transformative research”; at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformative_research (5 April 2018).

  49. 49.

    In 2012, the NSF hosted a brainstorming workshop on “Transformative Research: Ethical and Societal Dimensions” that explored the history and alternative conceptions that play an important role in policy debates, and in public discourse on the future of science in society. Key points of the discussion were summarised by Michael E. Gorman, a Professor in the department of science, technology, and society (STS) at the University of Virginia, at: http://www.cccblog.org/?s=Gorman (5 April 2018).

  50. 50.

    See the three previous volumes edited by Oswald Spring et al. (2014, 2016b); Brauch et al. (2016a).

  51. 51.

    The proposal by Conca (1994) on “environmental peacemaking” has achieved a total of 322 citations according to ‘google scholar’ from 2002 until April 2018; Amster’s book on peace ecology has gained only 26 citations since 2015. The book by Oswald Spring, Brauch, Tidballs achieved since December 2013 until February 2018 a total of 4799 chapter downloads and the introductory chapter that specifically touches peace ecology received 546 chapter downloads; see at: http://www.bookmetrix.com/detail_full/book/b795abb3-6400-4db9-8073-c03a6ec82f5d#downloads (5 April 2018).

  52. 52.

    This section relies on Brauch (2016c), where the peace concept has been presented in more detail. The text of the UN Charter is at: http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/ (6 April 2018).

  53. 53.

    For a discussion of the “meanings of peace” that includes the philosophical debate in China (including Lao Tzu, Confucius, Mo Tzu), and in Buddhist, Hindu, and Judaeo-Christian thinking with the goal of “achieving positive peace”, see Webel (2008) and Oswald Spring (2008).

  54. 54.

    Johan Galtung commented on an earlier draft: “To me both sustainable peace and environment are guided by two basic deep structures: diversity and symbiosis; hence very dynamic. To impose one culture, Western, one structure, capitalism will lead to the collapse of both; cultures-structures in partnership and species, abiota and biota in symbiosis will lead to higher complexity, evolution—that then has to be watched but is promising.  What I read seems to me very compatible with these simple propositions.”

  55. 55.

    See e.g. Peck (1998); Ekiyor (2006); International Fellowship of Reconciliation (2010); Barnes (2010); Ellerby (2011); Oswald Spring et al. (2014): “Engendered and Sustainable Peace with Resilience Building”, presentation at the 25th IPRA conference in Istanbul; at: http://www.afes-press.de/html/pdf/2014_UOS/text_16.pdf (6 April 2018).

  56. 56.

    See the discussion by Brauch (2016c: 210–211) on “Developing Sustainable Peace Further” based on the then available literature.

  57. 57.

    See at: http://www.igbp.net/globalchange/greatacceleration.4.1b8ae20512db692f2a680001630.html.

  58. 58.

    The global scientific debate on “planetary boundaries” was triggered by these two publications: Rockström et al. (2009); Steffen/Stafford Smith (2013); Steffen et al. (2015b); see also the special website of the Stockholm Resilience Centre: http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2015-01-15-planetary-boundaries---an-update.html (6 April 2018).

  59. 59.

    This may require for the author to revise his more positive assessment he expressed during the 50th anniversary of IPRA during its 25th Conference in Istanbul in August 2014, one hundred years after the start of the first World War (see Brauch 2016b).

  60. 60.

    Wikipedia: “Transformative research” (30 August 2017); at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformative_research; Trevors et al. (2012).

  61. 61.

    European Research Council: “Frontier Research”; at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/guides_for_applicants/h2020-guide17-erc-adg_en.pdf.

  62. 62.

    See for an illustration of the transformative research concept of the Wuppertal Institute; at: https://wupperinst.org/en/research/transformative-research/ (30 August 2017).

References

  • Amster, Randall, 2014: Peace Ecology (Boulder, CO: Paradigm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Ashley A., 2017: “Effects of Social Media Use on Climate Change Opinion, Knowledge, and Behavior”, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Climate Change, March; at: http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-369 (5 April 2018).

  • Anderson, Martin, 1990: Revolution: The Reagan Legacy (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus, Ian, 2015: “When did the Anthropocene begin and why does it matter?”, in: Climate & Capitalism (10 September); at: http://climateandcapitalism.com/2015/09/10/when-did-the-anthropocene-begin-and-why-does-it-matter/ (1 September 2017).

  • Angus, Ian, 2016: “Earth System: Anthropocene Working Group: Yes, a new epoch has begun”, posted on 9 January 2016; at: http://climateandcapitalism.com/2016/01/09/anthropocene-working-group-yes-a-new-epoch-has-begun/ (1 September 2017).

  • Angus, Ian, 2017: “Protecting business as usual: Another attack on Anthropocene science”, posted on 24 January 2017; at: http://climateandcapitalism.com/2017/01/24/another-attack-on-anthropocene-science/ (1 September 2017).

  • Barnes, Karen, 2010: Engendering peace or a gendered peace? The UN and liberal peacebuilding in Sierra Leone, 2002–2007, Ph.D. thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (London, UK); at: http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2375/ (6 April 2018).

  • Beck, Ulrich: “Subpolitics. Ecology and the Disintegration of Institutional Power”, in: Organization & Environment, 10(1) (March 1997): 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biello, David, 2015: “Did the Anthropocene Begin in 1950 or 50,000 Years Ago?”, in: Scientific American, 2 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E., 1966: “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth”, in: Jarrett, H. (Ed.): Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E., 1978: Ecodynamics (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 1994: Global Structural Change, System Transformation and no National Change. Armament and Disarmament Policy in American-Soviet Relations (1981–1992) (Berlin, Free University, habilitation, unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2002: “Climate Change, Environmental Stress and Conflict—AFES-PRESS Report for the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety”, in: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (Ed.): Climate Change and Conflict. Can Climate Change Impacts Increase Conflict Potentials? What is the Relevance of This Issue for the International Process on Climate Change? (Berlin: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2002): 9–112; at: http://www.afes-press.de/pdf/Brauch_ClimateChange_BMU.pdf.

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2005: Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in Environmental Human Security. Source, 1/2005 (Bonn: UNU-EHS); at: http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:1868/pdf4040.pdf.

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2008: “Introduction: Globalisation and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualising Security in the 21st Century”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P. H. (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2009a: “Securitizing Global Environmental Change”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 4 (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 65–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2009b: “Introduction: Facing Global Environmental Change and Sectorialization of Security”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 4 (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in US National Security Documents (1990–2010)”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016a: “Building Sustainable Peace by Moving Towards Sustainability Transition”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Erendira (Eds.): Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer International Publishers, 2016): 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016b: “Historical Times and Turning Points in a Turbulent Century: 1914, 1945, 1989 and 2014”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Erendira (Eds.): Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer International Publishers, 2016): 11–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016c: “Conceptualizing Sustainable Peace in the Anthropocene: A Challenge and Task for an Emerging Political Geoecology and Peace Ecology”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer): 187–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2019: “Review of the Emerging Debates on the Anthropocene in the Natural and Social Sciences, in the Humanities, National and International Law and in Politics and Policies” in: Benner, Susanne; Lax, Gregor; Crutzen, Paul J.; Lelieveld, Jos; Pöschl, Ulrich (Eds.): Paul J. Crutzen: The Anthropocene Fundamental Concepts, Perspectives and Implications (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2009: Securitizing the Ground - Grounding Security (Bonn: UNCCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2016: “Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace: Scientific and Policy Context, Scientific Concepts and Dimensions”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 3–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P. H. (Eds.), 2008: Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Dalby, Simon; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2011a: “Political Geoecology for the Anthropocene”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 1453–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.), 2011b: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security—Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Erendira, 2016a: Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.), 2016b: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand, 1949: La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II (Paris: Armand Colin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand, 1969: “Histoire et science sociales. La longue durée”, in: Écrits Sur l’Histoire (Paris: Flammarion): 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand, 1972: The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, 2 volumes (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987: Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Mark, 2017: Climate Wars (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry; Lawson, George, 2015: The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, James A., 2010: The Theory and Principles of Environmental Dispute Resolution (San Bernardino, CA: edrusa.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capstick, Stuart Bryce; Pidgeon, Nicholas Frank, 2014: “What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public”, in: Global Environmental Change, 24 (January): 389–401; at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378013001477 (5 April 2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. C.; Pak, A. W., 2006: “Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness”, in: Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6) (December): 351–364; at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17330451.

  • Clark, William C.; Crutzen, Paul J.; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 2004: “Science and Global Sustainability: Toward a New Paradigm”, in: Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Crutzen, Paul J.; Clark, William C.; Claussen, Martin; Held, Hermann (Eds.): Earth System Analysis for Sustainability (Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken, 1994: “In the Name of Sustainability: Peace Studies and Environmental Discourse”, in: Kakonen, Jyrki (Ed.): Green Security or Militarized Environment (Dartmouth: Aldershot): 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken, 2002: “The Case for Environmental Peacemaking”, in: Conca, Ken; Dabelko, Geoffrey (Eds.): Environmental Peacemaking (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken; Dabelko, Geoffrey, 2002: “The Case for Environmental Peacemaking”, in: Conca, Ken; Dabelko, Geoffrey (Eds.): Environmental Peacemaking (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J., 2002: “Geology of Mankind”, in: Nature, 415(3) (January): 23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J., 2011: “The Anthropocene: A geology of mankind”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.), 2011: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security—Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J.; Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.), 2016: Paul J. Crutzen: The Anthropocene: A New Phase of Earth History: Impacts for Science and Politics (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht—London: Springer, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J.; Stoermer, Eugene F., 2000: “The Anthropocene”, in: IGBP Newsletter, 41: 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen¸ Paul J.; Birks, John W., 1982: “The atmosphere after a nuclear war: Twilight at noon”, in: Ambio, 11: 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, Simon, 2013: “The Geopolitics of Climate Change”, in: Political Geography, 37: 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, Simon, 2014: “Rethinking Geopolitics: Climate Security in the Anthropocene”, in: Global Policy, 5(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, Simon, 2015: “Climate Geopolitics: Securing the Global Economy”, in: International Politics, 52(4): 426–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, Simon, 2016: “Framing the Anthropocene: The good, the bad and the ugly”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 3(1); at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019615618681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Gwynne, 2011: Climate Wars: The Fight for Survival as the World Overheats (London: Oneworld Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekiyor, Thelma, 2006: Engendering Peace - How the Peacebuilding Commission can live up to UN Security Council Resolution 1325, FES Briefing Paper (New York: Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, June); at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/global/50420.pdf (6 April 2018).

  • Ellerby, Kara L., 2011: Engendered Security: Norms, Gender and Peace Agreements, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona (Tucson, Arizona, USA); at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.9065&rep=rep1&type=pdf (6 April 2018).

  • Flinders, Matthew; John, Peter, 2013: “The Future of Political Science”, in: Political Studies Review, 11: 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo, 1975: Conscientization (Geneva, World Council of Churches).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis, 1989: “The End of History?”, in: The National Interest (Summer): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis, 1992: The End of History and the Last Man (Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S.; Ravetz, J. R., 1993: “Science for the Post-Normal Age”, in: Future, 25: 735–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S.; Ravetz, J. R., 2003: “Post-Normal Science”, in: International Society for Ecological Economics, Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics; at: http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf (6 February 2016).

  • Galtung, Johan, 1967: “Peace Research: science, or politics in disguise?”, in: International Spectator, 21(19): 1573–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan, 1968: “Peace”, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (London–New York; Macmillan): 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan, 1969: “Violence, Peace and Peace Research”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 3: 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan, 2003: “Cultural Peace: Some Characteristics”, 12 October; at: https://www.transcend.org/files/article121.html.

  • Göpel, Maja, 2016: The Great Mindshift: How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations go Hand in Hand (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, Johan, 2010: Transitions to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (New York, NY–London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter M. (Ed.), 1992: Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination (International Organization, 46(1)), (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, Hermann, 1983: Synergetics: An Introduction. Nonequilibrium Phase Transition and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude; Hoffmann-Riem, Holger; Biber-Klemm, Susette; Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Walter; Joye, Dominique; Pohl, Christian; Wiesmann, Urs; Zemp, Elisabeth (Eds.), 2008: Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric, 1994: The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991 (London: Michael Joseph).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Kalevi J., 1991: Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Kalevi J., 2016a: Major Texts on War, the State, Peace, and International Order (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Kalevi J., 2016b: Kalevi Holsti: A Pioneer in International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Analysis, History of International Order, and Security Studies (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Kalevi, 1996: The State War and the State of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, Burkart, 1968: Reality Construction in Society (Cambridge: Schenkman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, Burkart; Marx, John, 1979: Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett, Richard John, 1995: Geoecology. An Evolutionary Approach (London–New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P., 1993: “The Clash of Civilizations”, in: Foreign Affairs, 72(3) (Summer): 22–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P., 1996: The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fellowship of Reconciliation, 2010: Engendering Peace: Incorporating a Gender Perspective in Civilian Peace Teams (Alkmar: International Fellowship of Reconciliation); at: http://www.peacewomen.org/assets/file/Resources/NGO/reconpb_engenderedpeaec_iforwpp_2010.pdf (6 April 2018).

  • IPCC, 1990: Climate Change. The IPCC Impacts Assessment (Geneva: WMO; UNEP; IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 1995: IPCC Second Assessment Climate Change 1995. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva: WMO, UNEP).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report (Geneva: IPCC); at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf.

  • IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014—Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers (Geneva: IPCC); at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.

  • ISSC (International Social Science Council), 2012: Transformative Cornerstones of Social Science Research for Global Change (Paris: ISSC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochum, Uwe, 2010: “Wissensrevolution”, in: WBG Weltgeschichte, vol. V: Entstehung der Moderne 1700 bis 1914 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft): 150–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Twig, 2016: “Policy, Politics and the Impact of Transition Studies”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer): 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary, 1999: New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity–Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary, 2002: New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi: “Capitalism vs. the Climate—Denialists are dead wrong about the science. But they understand something the left still doesn’t get about the revolutionary meaning of climate change”, in: The Nation, 28 November 2011; at: http://www.thenation.com/article/164497/capitalism-vs-climate (25 January 2014).

  • Kuhn, Thomas, 1962: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunnas, Jan, 2017: “Storytelling: From the early Anthropocene to the good or the bad Anthropocene”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 4(2) (14 August); at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053019617725538 (7 April 2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyrou, Christos N., 2007: “Peace Ecology: An Emerging Paradigm in Peace Studies”, in: The International Journal of Peace Studies, 12(2) (Spring/Summer): 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, David S., 1969: The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, Christopher: The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present (Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press, 2006): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned, 1994: “The long peace, the end of the cold war, and the failure of realism”, in: International Organization, 48(2) (Spring): 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned; Risse-Kappen, Thomas, 1996: International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, Timothy; Held, Hermann; Kriegler, Elmar; Hall, Jim W.; Lucht, Wolfgang; Ramstorf, Stefan; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 2008: “Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system”, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), 105(6) (12 February): 1786–1793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas, 1991: Soziale Systeme (Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J., 1990: “Back to the Future. Instability in Europe after the Cold War”, in: International Security, 15(1) (Summer): 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried, 2004: Die neuen Kriege (Reinbek: Rowohlt).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board, 2007: Enhancing Support of Transformative Research at the National Science Foundation (Washington DC: National Science Foundation); at: https://www.nsf.gov/about/transformative_research/definition.jsp (6 February 2016).

  • Nordhaus, Ted; Shellenberger, Michael, 2004–2007: Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility (Boston: Houghton Mufflin Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, Ted; Shellenberger, Michael et al., 2015a: “An Ecomodernist Manifesto.” (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, Ted; Shellenberger, Michael; Mukuno, Jenna, 2015b: “Ecomodernism and the Anthropocene,” in: Breakthrough Journal (Summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Notter, Harley: Postwar Foreign Policy Preparation, 1939–1945 (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council), 1999: Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade (Washington DC: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi, 2004: “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change”, in: Science, 3 December 2004: 306(5702) (December): 1686; at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, Jürgen, 2014: The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Ùrsula, 2008: “Oriental, European and Indigenous Thinking on Peace in Latin America”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H. (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “Coping with Global Environmental Change—Sustainability Revolution and Sustainable Peace”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn, 2010: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security—Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 1487–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G., 2014: “Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender”, in: Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G. (Eds.), 2014: Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender—Perspectives of IPRA’s Ecology and Peace Commission (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2016a: “Sustainability Transition with Sustainable Peace: Key Messages and Scientific Outlook”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer): 887–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Serrano Oswald, Serena Erendira; Bennett, Juliet, 2016b: Regional Ecological Challenges for Peace in Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia Pacific (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Partsch, Karl-Josef, 1994: “Art. 55 (c)”, in: Simma, Bruno (Ed.): The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 776–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Connie, 1998: Sustainable Peace: The Role of the UN and Regional Organizations in Preventing Conflicts (Lanham–Boulder–New York: Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl, 1944: Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya; Stengers, Isabelle, 1997: The End of Certainty (Glencoe: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P.; Banuri, T.; Gallopin, G.; Gutman, P.; Hammond, A.; Kates, A.; Swart, R., 2002: Great Transition. The Promise and the Lure of the Times Ahead. Report of the Global Scenario Group. Pole Start Series Report 10 (Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, Johan; Steffen, Will; Noone, Kevin; Persson, Åsa; Chapin, III, F. Stuart; Lambin, Eric; Lenton, Timothy M.; Scheffer, Marten; Folke, Carl; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Nykvist, Björn; De Wit, Cynthia A.; Hughes, Terry; Leeuw, Sander van der; Rodhe, Henning; Sörlin, Sverker; Snyder, Peter K.; Costanza, Robert; Svedin, Uno; Falkenmark, Malin; Karlberg, L.; Corell, Robert W.; Fabry, Victoria J.; Hansen, James; Walker, Brian; Liverman, Diana M.; Richardson, Katherine; Crutzen, Paul; Foley, Jonathan A., 2009: “Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity”, in: Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32; at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.

  • Scheffran, Jürgen; Brzoska, Michael; Brauch, Hans Günter; Link, Peter Michael; Schilling, Janpeter (Eds.), 2012: Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict: Challenges for Societal Stability (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 1999: “‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution”, in: Nature: 402: C19–C23 (2 December); at: https://doi.org/10.1038/35011515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Cramer, Wolfgang; Nakicenovic, Nebojsa; Wigley, Tom; Yohe, Gary (Eds.), 2006: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Hare, William L.; Serdeczny, Olivia; Adams, Sophie; Coumou, Dim; Frieler, Katja; Marin, Maria; Otto, Ilona M.; Perrette, Mahé; Robinson, Alexander; Rocha, Marcia; Schaeffer, Michiel; Schewe, Jacob; Wang, Xiaoxi; Warszawski, Lila, 2012: Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4 ℃ Warmer World Must Be Avoided (Washington DC: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Serdeczny, Olivia Maria; Adams, Sophie; Köhler, Claudia; Otto, Ilona Magdalena; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, 2016: “The Challenge of a 4 ℃ World by 2100”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer, forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind, Uwe; Singer-Brodowski, Mandy, 2013, 22014: Transformative Wissenschaft- Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts- und Hochschulsystem (Marburg: Metropolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind, Uwe; Singer-Brodowski, Mandy; Augenstein, Karoline, 2016: “Transformative Science for Sustainable Transitions”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Robert, 2015: Kenneth Boulding: A Voice Crying in the Wilderness (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, Alexandra, 2017: “Online and Social Media Campaigns for Climate Change Engagement”, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Climate Change, June; at: http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-398 (5 April 2018).

  • Shellenberger, Michael; Nordhaus, Ted, 2004: The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World (Oakland, Ca: The Breakthrough Institute); at: https://www.thebreakthrough.org/images/Death_of_Environmentalism.pdf.

  • Steffen, W.; Stafford Smith, M., 2013: “Planetary boundaries, equity and global sustainability: Why wealthy countries could benefit from more equity”, in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, Will; McNeill, John; Crutzen, Paul J., 2007: “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the great forces of Nature?, in: Ambio, 36: 614–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, Will; Grinevald, Jacques; Crutzen, Paul J.; McNeill, John, 2011: “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, in: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369: 843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, Will; Broadgate, Wendy; Deutsch, Lisa, 2015a: “The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 2(1) (15 January).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, Will; Richardson, Katherine; Rockström, Johan; Cornell, Sarah E.; Fetzer, Ingo; Bennett, Elena M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, Stephen R.; de Vries, Wim; de Wit, Cynthia A.; Folke, Carl; Gerten, Dieter; Heinke, Jens; Mace, Georgina M.; Persson, Linn M.; Ramanathan, Veerabhadran; Reyers, B.; Sörlin, Sverker, 2015b: “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet”, in: Science, 347(6223).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, Carolyn M., 2016: “Paradigm and Praxis Shifts: Transitions to Sustainable Environmental and Sustainable Peace Praxis”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer): 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Nicholas, 2006, 2007, 42008: The Economics of Climate ChangeThe Stern Review (Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, Mark, 2016: “Preparing for Global Transition; Implications of the Work of the International Resource Panel”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.), 2016: Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham–Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London: Springer): 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandoc Jr., Edson C.; Eng, Nicholas, 2018: “Climate Change Communication on Facebook, Twitter, Sina Weibo, and Other Social Media Platforms”, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Climate Change, April; at: http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-361?rskey=kaowcK&result=1 (5 April 2018).

  • Tomuschat, Christian, 1994: “Chapter VI. Pacific Settlement of Disputes, Art. 33”, in: Simma, Bruno (Ed.): The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevors, J. T.; Pollack, Gerald H.; Saier, Jr., Milton H.; Masson, Luke, 2012: “Transformative research: definitions, approaches and consequences”, in: Theory in Bioscience, June, 131(2): 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Science Board, 2007: Enhancing Support of Transformative research at the National Science Foundation (Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 7 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 2009: Climate change and its possible security implications. Report of the Secretary-General. A/64/350 of 11 September 2009 (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP, 2011: Green Economy Report: Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication (Nairobi: UNEP); at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf.

  • United States Global Change Research Program, 2009: Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSC, 2011: “Statement by the President of the Security Council on Maintenance of Peace and Security: Impact of Climate Change”, S/PRST/1011/15, 20 July 2011; (27 July 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasak, K., 1984: “Pour une troisième génération des droits de l’homme”, in: Swinarski, Christophe (Ed.): Studies in Honour of Jean Pictet (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers): 837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Colin Neil; Zalasiewicz, Jan A.; Williams, Mark; Ellis, Michael A.; Snelling, Andrea M., 2014: A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene (London: Geological Society, London, Special Publications 395).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBGU, 2007: World in Transition—Climate Change Security Risk (Berlin: German Advisory Council on Global Change, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU, 2011: World in Transition—A Social Contract for Sustainability (Berlin: German Advisory Council on Global Change, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987: Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webel, Charles P.; Barash, David P., 22008: Peace and Conflict Studies (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzer, Harald, 2012: Climate Wars: What People Will Be Killed For in the 21st Century (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O., 1998: Consilience (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, Rüdiger, 1994: “Chapter 1. Purposes and Principles, Art. 1”, in: Simma, Bruno (Ed.): The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Williams, Mark; Smith, Alan et al., 2008: “Are we now living in the Anthropocene?”, in: GSA Today, 18(2): 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Williams, Mark; Steffen, Will; Crutzen, Paul, 2010: “The New World of the Anthropocene”, in: Environment Science & Technology, 44(7): 2228–2231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Waters, Colin N.; Summerhayes, Colin P.; Wolfe, Alexander P.; Barnosky, Anthony D.; Cearreta, Alejandro; Crutzen, Paul; Ellis, Erle; Fairchild, Ian J.; Gałuszka, Agnieszka; Haff, Peter; Hajdas, Irka; Head, Martin J.; Ivar do Sul, Juliana A.; Jeandel, Catherine; Leinfelder, Reinhold; McNeill, John R.; Neal, Cath; … Williams, Mark, 2017a: “The Working Group on the Anthropocene: Summary of evidence and interim recommendations”, in: Anthropocene, 19 (September): 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Waters, Colin N.; Wolfe, Alexander P. et al., 2017b: “Making the Case for a formal Anthropocene Epoch: an analysis of ongoing critiques”, in: Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 50(2) (March): 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Steffen, Will; Leinfelder, Reinhold; Williams, Mark; Waters, Colin, 2017c: “Petrifying Earth Process: The Stratigraphic Imprint of Key Earth System Parameters in the Anthropocene”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3): 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, Dieter, 2010: “Die Industrialisierung”, in: WBG Weltgeschichte, vol. V: Entstehung der Moderne 1700 bis 1914 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft): 41–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Günter Brauch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brauch, H.G. (2019). Sustainable Peace Through Sustainability Transition as Transformative Science: A Peace Ecology Perspective in the Anthropocene. In: Brauch, H., Oswald Spring, Ú., Collins, A., Serrano Oswald, S. (eds) Climate Change, Disasters, Sustainability Transition and Peace in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97562-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics